On the sorting of the repertoire: An analysis of cohn's challenge to integrity (dembic), round 2

Scandinavian Journal of Immunology

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 321-325

  Anderson, C C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGEN;

ANALYSIS; AUTOIMMUNITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; IMMUNE SYSTEM; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; T-LYMPHOCYTES, REGULATORY;

EID: 70049097729     PISSN: 03009475     EISSN: 13653083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02288.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (24)

1. Cohn M. On the critique by Colin Anderson of 'A reply to Dembic: on an end to the beginning of mis-understanding the immune response'. Scand J Immunol 2009 70 : 1 9.
2. Jacob F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 1977 196 : 1161 1166.
3. Cohn M. A rationalized set of default postulates that permit a coherent description of the immune system amenable to computer modeling. Scand J Immunol 2008 68 : 371 380.
4. Cohn M. A reply to dembic: on an end to the beginning of misunderstanding the immune response. Scand J Immunol 2009 69 : 302 305.
5. Cohn M. What roles do regulatory T cells play in the control of the adaptive immune response? Int Immunol 2008 20 : 1107 1118.
6. Matzinger P. Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control? Nat Immunol 2007 8 : 11 3.
7. Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol 1994 12 : 991 1045.
8. Lederberg J. Genes and antibodies. Science 1959 129 : 1649 1653.
9. Anderson CC. Time, space and contextual models of the immunity tolerance decision: bridging the geographical divide of Zinkernagel and Hengartner's 'Credo 2004'. Scand J Immunol 2006 63 : 249 256.
10. Handel A, Yates A, Pilyugin SS, Antia R. Gap junction-mediated antigen transport in immune responses. Trends Immunol 2007 28 : 463 466.
11. Bretscher P. Contemporary models for peripheral tolerance and the classical 'historical postulate'. Semin Immunol 2000 12 : 221 229. Discussion 57-344.
12. Forsthuber T, Yip HC, Lehmann PV. Induction of TH1 and TH2 immunity in neonatal mice. Science 1996 271 : 1728 1730.
13. Ridge JP, Fuchs EJ, Matzinger P. Neonatal tolerance revisited: turning on newborn T cells with dendritic cells. Science 1996 271 : 1723 1726.
14. Sarzotti M, Robbins DS, Hoffman PM. Induction of protective CTL responses in newborn mice by a murine retrovirus. Science 1996 271 : 1726 1728.
15. Billingham RE, Brent L, Medawar PB. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. III. Actively acquired tolerance. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1956 239 : 357 417.
16. Bretscher PA. A two-step, two-signal model for the primary activation of precursor helper T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96 : 185 190.
17. Anderson CC, Carroll JM, Gallucci S, Ridge JP, Cheever AW, Matzinger P. Testing time-, ignorance-, and danger-based models of tolerance. J Immunol 2001 166 : 3663 3671.
18. Chan WF, Perez-Diez A, Razavy H, Anderson CC. The ability of natural tolerance to be applied to allogeneic tissue: determinants and limits. Biol Direct 2007 2 : 10.
19. Bretscher P. Living with the ups and downs of the two signal model. Immunol Cell Biol 2004 82 : 141 148.
20. Anderson CC, Matzinger P. Immunity or tolerance: opposite outcomes of microchimerism from skin grafts. Nat Med 2001 7 : 80 7.
21. Smith KM, Olson DC, Hirose R, Hanahan D. Pancreatic gene expression in rare cells of thymic medulla: evidence for functional contribution to T cell tolerance. Int Immunol 1997 9 : 1355 1365.
22. Morgan DJ, Kurts C, Kreuwel HT, Holst KL, Heath WR, Sherman LA. Ontogeny of T cell tolerance to peripherally expressed antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96 : 3854 3858. (Pubitemid 29169000)
23. Chan WF, Razavy H, Anderson CC. Differential susceptibility of allogeneic targets to indirect CD4 immunity generates split tolerance. J Immunol 2008 181 : 4603 4612.
24. Sinclair NR. How many signals are enough? Cell Immunol 1990 130 : 204 212. Discussion 13-35.