Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 972-982

  Fisichella, V A ^a   Jaderling F ^b   Horvath, S ^a   Stotzer, P O ^a   Kilander, A ^a   Bath M ^a   Hellstrom M ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b ST GÖRAN S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 69949083353     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Juchems M.S., Fleiter T.R., Pauls S., et al. CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 68-72
2. Carrascosa P., Capuñay C., Martín López E., et al. Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions. Abdom Imaging 32 (2007) 582-588
3. Kim S.H., Lee J.M., Eun H.W., et al. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 244 (2007) 852-864
4. Hoppe H., Quattropani C., Spreng A., et al. Virtual colon dissection with CT-colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 1151-1158
5. Johnson C.D., Fletcher J.G., MacCarthy R.L., et al. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 672-680
6. Fisichella V., Jäderling F., Horvath S., et al. Primary 2D analysis versus primary 3D analysis with perspective-filet view: lesion detection by inexperienced readers at CT colonography in symptomatic patients. Acta Radiol 50 (2009) 244-255
7. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Mallett S., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1690-1699
8. Baker M.E., Bogoni L., Obuchowski N.A., et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 245 (2007) 140-149
9. Mang T., Peloschek P., Plank C., et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 2598-2607
10. Petrick N., Haider M., Summers R.M., et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 246 (2008) 148-156
11. Hock D., Ouhadi R., Materne R., et al. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection. Radiology 248 (2008) 860-868
12. Taylor S.A., Charman S.C., Lefere P., et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 246 (2008) 463-471
13. Burling D., Moore A., Marshall M., et al. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance. Clin Radiol 63 (2008) 549-556
14. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
15. Halligan S., Taylor S.A., Dehmeshki J., et al. Computer-assisted detection for CT colonography: external validation. Clin Radiol 61 (2006) 758-763
16. Altman D.G., and Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?. Stat Med 19 (2000) 453-473
17. Chakraborty D.P. JAFROC-1 software. Available from:. http://www.devchakraborty.com [accessed 28.11.08]
18. Chakraborty D.P. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. Acad Radiol 15 (2008) 1554-1566
19. Chakraborty D.P., and Berbaum K.S. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis and validation. Med Phys 31 (2004) 2313-2330
20. Ruschin M., Timberg P., Båth M., et al. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. Med Phys 34 (2007) 400-407
21. Vikgren J., Zachrisson S., Svalkvist A., et al. Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. Radiology 249 (2008) 1034-1041
22. Edwards D.C., Kupinski M.A., Metz C.E., et al. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. Med Phys 29 (2002) 2861-2870
23. Pesce L.L., and Metz C.E. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. Acad Radiol 14 (2007) 814-829
24. Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research at the University of Chicago. Available from:. http://www-radiology.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL_ROC/software_index6.htm [accessed 28.11.08]
25. Yoon H.J., Zheng B., Sahiner B., et al. Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms. Med Phys 34 (2007) 2024-2038
26. Yoshida H., Näppi J., MacEneaney P., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics 22 (2002) 963-979
27. Summers R.M., Yao J., Pickhardt P.J., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 1832-1844
28. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Burling D., et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 696-702
29. Summers R.M., Handwerker L.R., Pickhardt P.J., et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (2008) 168-174
30. Taylor S.A., Burling D., Roddie M., et al. Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: incremental benefit of observer training. Br J Radiol 81 (2008) 180-186
31. Mani A., Napel S., Paik D.S., et al. Computed tomography colonography-feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 (2004) 318-326