Corrigendum to: "Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance" [Clin Radiol 63 (2008) 549-556] (DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2007.11.006);Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 549-556

  Burling, D ^a   Moore, A ^a   Marshall, M ^a   Weldon, J ^a   Gillen, C ^a   Baldwin, R ^a   Smith, K ^a   Pickhardt, P ^a   Honeyfield, L ^a   Taylor, S ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL BIAS; STUDENT T TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 41049104171     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.04.002     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Burling D., Halligan S., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 39-43
2. Halligan S. CT colonography, colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients (SIGGAR1) (2006). http://www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk/project/1366.asp [accessed 27.12.2007]
3. Johnson CD. Review of clinical studies. The National CT Colonography Trial ACRIN 6664. In: Sixth International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 17-18, 2005, p. 49-51.
4. Taylor SA. Current and on-going validation. European Trials. In: Seventh International Symposium Virtual Colonoscopy. Boston, MA, October 16-18, 2006, p. 49-53.
5. Culpan D.G., Mitchell A.J., Hughes S., et al. Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists. Clin Radiol 57 (2002) 604-607
6. Brown L., and Desai S. Cost-effectiveness of barium enemas performed by radiographers. Clin Radiol 57 (2002) 129-131
7. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT colonography Group Investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multi-center study. Radiology 242 (2007) 152-161
8. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Mallett S., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1690-1699
9. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
10. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Burling D., et al. Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 696-702
11. Burling D., Taylor S., and Halligan S. Computerized tomography colonography. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 4 (2004) 615-625
12. Winawer S.J., Stewart E.T., Zauber A.G., et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1766-1772
13. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum dataset for study level reporting. Radiology 237 (2005) 893-904
14. Soto J.A., Barish M.A., and Yee J. Reader training in CT colonography: how much is enough?. Radiology 237 (2005) 26-27
15. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Burling D., et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 1025-1033
16. Taylor S.A., Laghi A., Lefere P., et al. European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17 (2007) 575-579
17. Bodily K.D., Fletcher J.G., Engelby T., et al. Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. Acad Radiol 12 (2005) 67-73
18. Burling D., Halligan S., and Atchley J.T. CT colonography: Interpretative performance in a non academic environment. Clin Radiol 62 (2007) 424-429