Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: Human observer study of clinical cases

Radiology

Volumn 249, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1034-1041

  Vikgren, Jenny ^a,b   Zachrisson, Sara ^a   Svalkvist, Angelica ^a   Johnsson, Åse A ^a,b   Boijsen, Marianne ^a,b   Flinck, Agneta ^a,b   Kheddache, Susanne ^a,b   Båth, Magnus ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; LUNG LESION; LUNG NODULE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TOMOSYNTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

HUMANS; MULTIPLE PULMONARY NODULES; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 58149198701     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492080304     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Geitung JT, Skjaerstad LM, Göthlin JH. Clinical utility of chest roentgenograms. Eur Radiol 1999;9:721-723.
2. Speets AM, van der Graaf Y, Hoes AW, et al. Chest radiography in general practice: indications, diagnostic yield and consequences for patient management. Br J Gen Pract 2006;56:574-578.
3. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996;201:798- 802.
4. Schueller G, Matzek W, Kalhs P, Schaefer-Prokop C. Pulmonary infections in the late period after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: chest radiography versus computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:489- 494.
5. Blanchon T, Bréchot JM, Grener PA, et al. Base line results of the Depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest x-ray (CXR). Lung Cancer 2007;58:50-58.
6. Elmali M, Baydin A, Nurai MS, Arslan B, Ceyhan M, Gurmen N. Lung parenchymal injury and its frequency in blunt thoracic trauma: the diagnostic value of chest radiography and thoracic CT. Diagn Interv Radiol 2007;13:179-182.
7. Graffelman AW, Willemssen FE, Zonderland HM, Neven AK, Kroes AC, van den Broek PJ. Limited value of chest radiography in predicting ethiology of lower respiratory tract infection in generalpractice. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:93-97.
8. Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P. Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 1999;26:1365-1370.
9. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR. Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. Radiology 1999;213:727-734.
10. Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 2001;28:419-437.
11. Båth M, Håkansson M, Börjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:85-91.
12. Båth M, Håkansson M, Börjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:102-108.
13. Båth M, Håkansson M, Börjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:109-113.
14. Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of nodule location. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:92-96.
15. Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, Kheddache S, Johnsson ÅA, Månsson LG. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:97-101.
16. Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, et al. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:114-120.
17. Mayo JR, Aldrich J, Muller NL. Radiation exposure at chest CT: a statement of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2003;228:15-21.
18. Renton J, Kincaid S, Ehrlich PF. Should helical CT scanning of the thoracic cavity replace the conventional chest x-ray as a primary assessment tool in pediatric trauma? an efficacy and cost analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:793-797.
19. Payne JT. CT radiation dose and image quality. Radiol Clin North Am 2005;43:953-962.
20. Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 2003;48:R65-R106.
21. McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins JT 3rd, Tourassi GD, Ravin CE. Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology 2006;241:663-683.
22. Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M, Sermovaa A. PCXMC: a PC-based Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, 1997.
23. Commission of the European Communities. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262 EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1996.
24. Peuch P, Boussel L. DicomWorks 1.3.5b. http://dicom.online.fr/. Published February 16, 2003;Accessed June 15, 2007.
25. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005;237:395-400.
26. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. Med Phys 2004;31:2313-2330.
27. Penedo M, Souto M, Tahoces PG, et al. Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology 2005;237:450-457.
28. Zheng B, Chakraborty DP, Rockette HE, Maitz GS, Gur D. A comparison of two data analyses from two observer performance studies using Jackknife ROC and JAFROC. Med Phys 2005;32:1031-1034.
29. Ruschin M, Timberg P, Båth M, et al. Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. Med Phys 2007;34:400-407.
30. Chakraborty DP. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1187-1193.
31. Chakraborty DP. JAFROC software 2.3a. http://www.devchakraborty.com/. Published 2008;Accessed April 17, 2008.
32. Edwards DC, Kupinski MA, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. Med Phys 2002;29:2861-2870.
33. Yoon HJ, Zheng B, Sahiner B, Chakraborty DP. Evaluating computer aided detection (CAD) algorithms. Med Phys 2007;34:2024-2038.
34. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998;18:110-121.
35. McAdams HP, Song JW, LiCM, Godfrey DJ, Delong D, Dobbins JT 3rd. Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection, interim clinical results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2007;327.
36. Chakraborty DP. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:26-31.
37. Rosenblum LJ, Mauceri RA, Wellenstein DE, et al. Density patterns in the normal lung as determined by computed tomography. Radiology 1980;137:409-416.
38. Valencia R, Denecke T, Lehmkuhl L, Fischbach F, Felix R, Knollmann F. Value of axial and coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images in the detection of pulmonary nodules by multi-slice spiral CT: comparisonwithaxial1- mmand 5-mmslices. Eur Radiol 2006;16:325-332.
39. Peloschek P, Sailer J, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C. Pulmonary nodules: sensitivity of maximum intensity projection versus that of volume rendering of 3D multidetector CT data. Radiology 2007;243:561-569.
40. Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2378-2383.