Doubts about complex speciation between humans and chimpanzees

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 533-540

  Presgraves, Daven C ^a,b   Yi, Soojin V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DIVERGENCE; HOMINID; HUMAN ACTIVITY; SEPARATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PAN TROGLODYTES; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; X CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, X; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; PAN TROGLODYTES;

PAN;

EID: 69749102659     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Patterson N., et al. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441 (2006) 1103-1108
2. Coyne J. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355 (1992) 511-515
3. Coyne J.A., and Orr H.A. Two rules of speciation. In: Otte D., and Endler J. (Eds). Speciation and Its Consequences (1989), Sinauer Associates 180-207
4. Presgraves D.C. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 24 (2008) 336-343
5. Patterson N., et al. Patterson et al. reply. Nature 452 (2008) E4
6. Li W.H. Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a finite population. Genetics 85 (1977) 331-337
7. Takahata N. An attempt to estimate the effective size of the ancestral species common to two extant species from which homologous genes are sequenced. Genet. Res. 48 (1986) 187-190
8. Hudson R.R. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. In: Futuyma D., and Antonovics J. (Eds). Oxford Surveys In Evolutionary Biology (1990), Oxford University Press 1-44
9. Wakeley J. Coalescent Theory (2008), Roberts & Company
10. Barton N.H. Evolutionary biology: how did the human species form?. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) R647-R650
11. Wakeley J. Complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 452 (2008) E3-E4
12. Mikkelsen T., et al. Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437 (2005) 69-87
13. Innan H., and Watanabe H. The effect of gene flow on the coalescent time in the human-chimpanzee ancestral population. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 1040-1047
14. Takahasi, K. and Innan, H. (2008) Inferring the process of human-chimpanzee speciation. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS), DOI:10.1002/9780470015902.a0020833, John Wiley & Sons
15. Takahata N., et al. Divergence time and population size in the lineage leading to modern humans. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48 (1995) 198-221
16. Burgess R., and Yang Z. Estimation of hominoid ancestral population sizes under Bayesian coalescent models incorporating mutation rate variation and sequencing errors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25 (2008) 1979-1994
17. Hobolth A., et al. Genomic relationships and speciation times of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla inferred from a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. 3 (2007) 294-304
18. Aquadro C.F., et al. Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. In: Golding B. (Ed). Non-neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data (1994), Chapman & Hall 46-56
19. Betancourt A., et al. A pseudohitchhiking model of X vs. autosomal diversity. Genetics 168 (2004) 2261-2269
20. Hammer M.F., et al. Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity. PLoS Genet. 4 (2008) e1000202
21. Fischer A., et al. Demographic history and genetic differentiation in apes. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1133-1138
22. Kaessmann H., et al. Great ape DNA sequences reveal a reduced diversity and an expansion in humans. Nat. Genet. 27 (2001) 155-156
23. Haldane J. The mutation rate of the gene for haemophilia, and its segregation ratios in males and females. Ann. Eugen. 13 (1947) 262-271
24. Miyata T., et al. Male-driven molecular evolution: a model and nucleotide sequence analysis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 52 (1987) 863-867
25. Ellegren H., and Fridolfsson A.-K. Sex-specific mutation rates in salmonid fish. J. Mol. Evol. 56 (2003) 458-463
26. Ellegren H., and Fridolfsson A.-K. Male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in birds. Nat. Genet. 17 (1997) 182-184
27. Goetting-Minesky M.P., and Makova K.D. Mammalian male mutation bias: Impacts of generation time and regional variation in substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 63 (2006) 537-544
28. Li W.H., et al. Male-driven evolution. Curr.Opin. Genet. Dev. 12 (2002) 650-666
29. Chang B.H.J., et al. Weak male-driven molecular evolution in rodents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91 (1994) 827-831
30. Makova K.D., et al. Insertions and deletions are male biased too: a whole-genome analysis in rodents. Genome Res. 14 (2004) 567-573
31. Li W.H., et al. Rates of nucleotide substitution in primates and rodents and the generation-time effect hypothesis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5 (1996) 182-187
32. Makova K.D., and Li W.H. Strong male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in humans and apes. Nature 416 (2002) 624-626
33. Shimmin L.C., et al. Male-driven evolution of DNA sequences. Nature 362 (1993) 745-747
34. Taylor J., et al. Strong and weak male mutation bias at different sites in the primate genomes: insights from the human-chimpanzee comparison. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 (2006) 565-573
35. Lander E., et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409 (2001) 860-921
36. Crow J.F. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1 (2000) 40-47
37. Hurst L.D., and Ellegren H. Sex biases in the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 14 (1998) 446-452
38. Waterston R., et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420 (2002) 520-562
39. Elango N., et al. Mutations of different molecular origins exhibit contrasting patterns of regional substitution rate variation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4 (2008) e1000015
40. Gibbs R., et al. Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science 316 (2007) 222-234
41. Elango, N. et al. Evolutionary rate variation in Old World monkeys. Biol. Lett. DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0712
42. Bohossian H.B., et al. Unexpectedly similar rates of nucleotide substitution found in male and female hominids. Nature 406 (2000) 622-625
43. Bartosch-Harlid A., et al. Life history and the male mutation bias. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 57 (2003) 2398-2406
44. Ruvolo M. Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: Inferences from multiple independent DNA sequence data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 (1997) 248-265
45. Martin R. The evolution of human reproduction: A primatological perspective. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 45 Suppl. (2007) 59-84
46. Harcourt A.H., et al. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293 (1981) 55-57
47. Smith R. Human sperm competition. In: Smith R. (Ed). Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (1984), Academic Press 601-659
48. Dixson A., and Anderson M. Sexual selection and the comparative anatomy of reproduction in monkeys, apes, and human beings. Annu. Rev. Sex Res. 12 (2001) 121-144
49. Ebersberger I., et al. Genome-wide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 (2002) 1490-1497
50. Goto H., et al. Evolution of X-degenerate Y chromosome genes in greater apes: conservation of gene content in human and gorilla, but not chimpanzee. J. Mol. Evol. 68 (2009) 134-144
51. Bird A. DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8 (1980) 1499-1504
52. Duncan B.K., and Miller J.H. Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA. Nature 287 (1980) 560-561
53. Ehrlich M., and Wang R.Y. 5-Methylcytosine in eukaryotic DNA. Science 212 (1980) 1350-1357
54. Kim S.-H., et al. Heterogeneous genomic molecular clocks in primates. PLoS Genet. 2 (2006) 1527-1534
55. Masly J.P., and Presgraves D.C. High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) 1890-1898
56. Tao Y., et al. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. I. Differential accumulation of hybrid male sterility effects on the X and autosomes. Genetics 164 (2003) 1383-1397
57. Turelli M., and Orr H.A. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140 (1995) 389-402
58. Turelli M., and Orr H.A. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154 (2000) 1663-1679
59. Tucker P.K., et al. Abrupt cline for sex chromosomes in a hybrid zone between two species of mice. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 46 (1992) 1146-1163
60. Saetre G.-P., et al. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 270 (2002) 53-59
61. Geraldes A., et al. Contrasting patterns of introgression at X-linked loci across the hybrid zone between subspecies of the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genetics 173 (2006) 919-933
62. Payseur B.A., et al. Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 58 (2004) 2064-2078
63. Putnam A.S., et al. Discordant divergence times among Z-chromosome regions between two ecologically distinct swallowtail butterfly species. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 61 (2007) 912-927
64. Maynard Smith J., and Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet. Res. 23 (1974) 23-35
65. Charlesworth B., et al. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134 (1993) 1289-1303
66. Charlesworth B. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet. Res. 77 (2001) 153-166