Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 135-167

  Mussweiler, Thomas ^a   Strack, Fritz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887554969     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14792779943000044     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., and Hart, K., 1988. Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 305–7.
2. Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., and Rothman, A. J., 1993. Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 272–81.
3. Biswas, A., and Burton, S., 1993. Consumer perceptions of tensile price claims in advertisements: An assessment of claim types across different discount levels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21: 217–29.
4. Bless, H., Strack, F., and Schwarz, N., 1993. The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 149–65.
5. Block, R., and Harper, D., 1991. Overconfidence in estimation: Testing the anchoring and adjustment hypothesis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49: 188–207.
6. Brown, D. R., 1953. Stimulus-similarity and the anchoring of subjective scales. American Journal of Psychology, 66: 199–214.
7. Bruner, J. S., 1957. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64: 123–52.
8. Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D. R., and Herr, P. M., 1993. An examination of the effects of information consistency and distinctiveness in a reference-price advertisement context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 2074–92.
9. Carlson, B. W., 1990. Anchoring and adjustment in judgments under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16: 665–76.
10. Cervone, D., and Peake, P. K., 1986. Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 492–501.
11. Chapman, G. B., and Bornstein, B. H., 1996. The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10: 519–40.
12. Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J., 1994. The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7: 223–42.
13. Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J., 1997. Anchoring, confirmatory search, and the construction of values (unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University)
14. Clark, H. H., and Schober, M. F., 1992. “ Asking questions and influencing answers ”. In Questions about Questions. Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, Edited by: Tanur, J. M., 15–47. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
15. Davies, M. F., 1992. Field dependence and hindsight bias: Cognitive restructuring and the generation of reasons. Journal of Research in Personality, 26: 58–74.
16. Davies, M. F., 1997. Belief persistence after evidential discrediting: The impact of generated versus provided explanations on the likelihood of discredited outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33: 561–78.
17. Davis, H. L., Hoch, S. J., and Ragsdale, E. K. E., 1986. An anchoring and adjustment model of spousal predictions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13: 25–37.
18. Fiedler, K., Armbruster, T., Nickel, S., Walther, E., and Asbeck, J., 1996. Constructive biases in social judgment: Experiments on the self-verification of question contents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 861–73.
19. Fischhoff, B., 1975. Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89: 288–99.
20. Förster, J., and Strack, F., 1998. Subjective theories about encoding may influence recognition: Judgmental regulation in human memory. Social Cognition, 16: 78–92.
21. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., and Malone, P. S., 1993. You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 221–3.
22. Grice, H. P., 1975. “ Logic and conversation ”. In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Edited by: Cole, P., and Morgan, J. L., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
23. Griffin, D. W., Dunning, D., and Ross, L., 1990. The role of construal processes in overconfident prediction about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 1128–39.
24. Helson, H., 1964. Adaptation Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior New York: Harper.
25. Herr, P. M., 1986. Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1106–15.
26. Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., and Fazio, R. H., 1983. On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19: 323–40.
27. Higgins, E. T., 1989. “ Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources ”. In Unintended Thought, Edited by: Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A., 75–123. New York: Guilford.
28. Higgins, E. T., 1996. “ Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience ”. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Edited by: Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W., 133–68. New York: Guilford.
29. Higgins, E. T., 1997. “ Biases in social cognition: Aboutness as a general principle ”. In The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society, Edited by: McGarty, C., and Haslam, S. A., 183–99. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
30. Higgins, E. T., and Brendl, C. M., 1995. Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31: 218–43.
31. Higgins, E. T., and Lurie, L., 1983. Context, categorization, and memory: The “change-of-standard” effect. Cognitive Psychology, 15: 525–47.
32. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., and Jones, C. R., 1977. Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 141–54.
33. Higgins, E. T., and Stangor, C., 1988. A “change-of-standard” perspective on the relations among context, judgment, and memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 181–92.
34. Hogarth, R. M., and Einhorn, H. J., 1992. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24: 1–55.
35. Holtgraves, T., and Skeel, J., 1992. Cognitive biases in playing the lottery: Estimating the odds and choosing the numbers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22: 934–52.
36. Jacowitz, K. E., and Kahneman, D., 1995. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 1161–6.
37. Johnson, E. J., and Schkade, D. A., 1989. Bias in utility assessments: Further evidence and explanations. Management Science, 35: 406–24.
38. Johnson, R. D., Rennie, R. D., and Wells, G. L., 1991. Outcome trees and baseball: A study of expertise and list length effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 324–40.
39. Johnson-Laird, P. N., 1983. Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Jones, E. E., and Harris, V. A., 1967. The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3: 1–24.
41. Joyce, E. J., and Biddle, G. C., 1981. Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inferences in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 19: 120–45.
42. Kahneman, D., and Knetsch, J., 1993. Anchoring or shallow inference: The effect of format (unpublished manuscipt)
43. Kahneman, D., and Miller, D. T., 1986. Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93: 136–53.
44. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., 1972. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3: 430–54.
45. Klayman, J., and Ha, Y.-W., 1987. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypotheses testing. Psychological Review, 94: 211–28.
46. Koehler, D. J., 1991. Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 499–519.
47. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B., 1980. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6: 107–18.
48. Kruglanski, A. W., and Webster, D. M., 1996. Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103: 263–83.
49. Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V., and Corneille, O., 1996. The role of applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 219–29.
50. Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P., 1971. Reversal of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89: 46–55.
51. Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., and Preston, E., 1984. Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1231–43.
52. Martin, L. L., 1986. Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 493–504.
53. Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., and Crelia, R. A., 1990. Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 27–37.
54. Mayseless, O., and Kruglanski, A. W., 1987. What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 162–83.
55. Mussweiler, T., 1997. A Selective Accessibility Model of Anchoring: Linking the Anchoring Heuristic to Hypothesis-consistent Testing and Semantic Priming Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
56. Mussweiler, T., and Englich, B., 1998. Legal judgment under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the court room (submitted for publication, University of Würzburg)
57. Mussweiler, T., Förster, J., and Strack, F., 1997. Der Ankereffekt in Abhängigkeit von der Anwendbarkeit ankerkonsistenter Information: Ein Modell selektiver Zugänglichkeit [The anchoring effect in dependence of the applicability of anchor-consistent information: A selective accessibility model]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44: 589–615.
58. Mussweiler, T., and Neumann, R., 1998. Increasing the robustness of priming effects: The role of self-generation (submitted for publication, University of Würzburg)
59. Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F., 1997. Temporal robustness of anchoring effects (unpublished data, University of Würzburg)
60. Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F., (in press). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
61. Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F., 1998. The use of category and exemplar knowledge in the solution of anchoring tasks (submitted for publication, University of Würzburg)
62. Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., and Pfeiffer, T., 1998. Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility (submitted for publication, University of Würzburg)
63. Nario, M. R., and Branscombe, N. R., 1995. Comparison processes in hindsight and causal attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 1244–55.
64. Neale, M. A., and Bazerman, M. H., 1991. Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation New York: Free Press.
65. Neely, J. H., 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106: 226–54.
66. Neely, J. H., 1991. “ Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories ”. In Basic Processes in Reading, Edited by: Besner, D., and Humphreys, G. W., 264–337. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A., 1987. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 84–97.
68. Ostrom, T. M., and Upshaw, H. S., 1968. “ Psychological perspectives and attitude change ”. In Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, Edited by: Greenwald, A. G., Brock, T. C., and Ostrom, T. M., 217–42. New York: Academic Press.
69. Parducci, A., 1965. Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72: 407–18.
70. Plous, S., 1989. Thinking the unthinkable: The effects of anchoring on likelihood estimates of nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19: 67–91.
71. Pohl, R. F., 1996. Der Rückschaufehler—Eine systematische Verfälschung der Erinnerung [The hindsight bias—A systematic memory distortion]. Report Psychologie, 21: 596–609.
72. Quattrone, G. A., 1982. Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42: 593–607.
73. Quattrone, G. A., Lawrence, C. P., Warren, D. L., Souza-Silva, K., Finkel, S. E., and Andrus, D. E., 1984. Explorations in anchoring: The effects of prior range, anchor extremity, and suggestive hints (Unpublished manuscript)
74. Ritov, I., 1996. Anchoring in simulated competitive market negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67: 16–25.
75. Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., and Hubbard, M., 1975. Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attribution in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 880–92.
76. Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., Strack, F., and Steinmetz, J., 1977. Social explanation and social expectation: Effects of real and hypothetical explanations on subjective likelihood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 817–29.
77. Schkade, D. A., and Johnson, E. J., 1989. Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44: 203–31.
78. Schwarz, N., 1994. “ Judgment in social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation ”. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Edited by: Zanna, M. P., 125–62. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
79. Schwarz, N., and Bless, H., 1992. “ Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment ”. In The Construction of Social Judgment, Edited by: Martin, H., and Tesser, A., 217–45. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Schwarz, N., and Wyer, R. S., 1985. Effects of rank ordering stimuli on magnitude ratings of these and other stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 30–46.
81. Sedikides, C., and Skowronski, J. J., 1991. The law of cognitive structure activation. Psychological Inquiry, 2: 169–84.
82. Slamecka, N. J., and Graf, P., 1978. The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4: 592–604.
83. Smith, E. R., and Branscombe, N. R., 1987. Procedurally mediated social inferences: The case of category accessibility effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23: 361–82.
84. Smith, E. R., and Branscombe, N. R., 1988. Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24: 490–504.
85. Srull, T. K., and Wyer, R. S., 1979. The role of category accessibility in the Interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 1660–72.
86. Strack, F., 1992. “ The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies ”. In The Construction of Social Judgment, Edited by: Martin, L. L., and Tesser, A., 249–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Strack, F., 1994. Zur Psychologie der standardisierten Befragung: Kognitive und kommunikative Prozesse Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
88. Strack, F., Erber, R., and Wicklund, R. A., 1982. Effects of salience and time pressure on ratings of social causality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18: 581–94.
89. Strack, F., and Förster, J., 1997. “Know thyself”: The role of metamnestic knowledge in recognition memory (unpublished manuscript, University of Würzburg)
90. Strack, F., and Martin, L. L., 1987. “ Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys ”. In Social Information Processing and Survey Methodology, Edited by: Hippler, H. J., Schwarz, N., and Sudman, S., 123–48. New York: Springer.
91. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., and Schwarz, N., 1988. Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgements of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 429–42.
92. Strack, F., and Mussweiler, T., 1997. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 437–46.
93. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., and Wänke, M., 1993. Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 53–62.
94. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., and Gschneidinger, E., 1985. Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 1460–69.
95. Svenson, O., 1985. Cognitive strategies in a complex judgment task: Analyses of concurrent verbal reports and judgments of cumulated risk over different exposure times. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36: 1–15.
96. Switzer, F. S., and Sniezek, J. A., 1991. Judgment processes in motivation: Anchoring and adjustment effects on judgment and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49: 208–29.
97. Trope, Y., and Bassok, M., 1982. Confirmatory and diagnostic strategies in social information gathering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 22–34.
98. Trope, Y., and Liberman, A., 1996. “ Social hypothesis testing: Cognitive and motivational factors ”. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, Edited by: Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W., 239–70. New York: Guilford.
99. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185: 1124–30.
100. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 91: 293–315.
101. Wegener, D. T., and Petty, R. E., 1995. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 36–51.
102. Wilson, T. D., and Brekke, N., 1994. Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116: 117–42.
103. Wilson, T. D., Houston, C., Etling, K. M., and Brekke, N., 1996. A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4: 387–402.
104. Wright, W. F., and Anderson, U., 1989. Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristics for probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44: 68–82.
105. Wyer, R. S., and Srull, T. K., 1989. Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
106. Yadav, M. S., 1994. How buyers evaluate product bundles: A model of anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Consumer Research, 21: 342–53.