Evolutionary transitions among dioecy, androdioecy and hermaphroditism in limnadiid clam shrimp (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1781-1799

  Weeks, S C ^a   Chapman, E G ^b,c   Rogers, D C ^d   Senyo, D M ^b   Hoeh, W R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^d EcoAnalysts Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian phylogenetics; Breeding system evolution; Conchostraca; Maximum likelihood phylogenetics; Mixed mating system

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANCESTRY; ANDRODIOECY; BRACHIOPOD; DIOECY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERMAPHRODITISM; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRUSTACEA; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESS; SEX DIFFERENTIATION DISORDER;

ANIMALS; CRUSTACEA; DISORDERS OF SEX DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESSES;

BIVALVIA; BRANCHIOPODA; CONCHOSTRACA; CRUSTACEA; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EULIMNADIA; LIMNADIA LENTICULARIS; LIMNADIIDAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SPINICAUDATA;

EID: 69249191522     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01813.x     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Baird, W. 1849. Monograph of the family Limnadiidae, a family of entomostracous crustacea. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 17 : 84 90.
2. Baker, H.G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after "long-distance" dispersal. Evolution 9 : 347 349.
3. Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Gen. 3 : 274 284.
4. Belk, D. 1989. Identification of species in the conchostracan genus Eulimnadia by egg-shell morphology. J. Crust. Biol. 9 : 115 125.
5. Bell, G. 1982. The Masterpiece of Nature. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
6. Braband, A., Richter, S., Hiesel, R. Scholtz, G. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllopoda (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25 : 229 244.
7. Brtek, J. 1997. Checklist of the valid and invalid names of the "large branchiopods" (Anostraca, Notostraca, Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata), with a survey of the taxonomy of all Branchiopoda. Zb. Slov. Nar. Muz. Prir. Vedy 43 : 2 65.
8. Charlesworth, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22 : 333 348.
9. Charlesworth, D. 2006. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr. Biol. 16 : R726 R735.
10. Charlesworth, D. Charlesworth, B. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112 : 975 997.
11. Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
12. Charnov, E.L., Maynard Smith, J. Bull, J.J. 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite? Nature 263 : 125 126.
13. Chasnov, J.R. in press. Sexual conflict over mating in androdioecious nematode worms and clam shrimp. Evolution.
14. Chasnov, J.R. Chow, K.L. 2002. Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans? Genetics 160 : 983 994.
15. Chasnov, J.R., So, W.K., Chan, C.M. Chow, K.L. 2007. The species, sex, and stage specificity of a Caenorhabditis sex pheromone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 : 6730 6735.
16. Daday, E. 1925. Monographie systematique des Phyllopodes Conchostraces. Troisieme partie. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologies 10e serie 8 : 143 184.
17. Delph, L.F. Wolf, D.E. 2005. Evolutionary consequences of gender plasticity in genetically dimorphic breeding systems. New Phytol. 166 : 119 128.
18. Dorken, M.E. Pannell, J.R. 2008. Density-dependent regulation of the sex ratio in an annual plant. Am. Nat. 171 : 824 830.
19. Dumont, H.J. Negrea, S.V. 2002. Introduction to the Class Branchiopoda. Backhuys, Leiden.
20. Edwards, A.W.F. 1972. Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Eppley, S.M. Jesson, L.K. 2008. Moving to mate: the evolution of separate and combined sexes in multicellular organisms. J. Evol. Biol. 21 : 727 736.
22. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 : 783 791.
23. Fernandez, A.A. Morris, M.R. 2007. Sexual selection and trichromatic color vision in primates: statistical support for the preexisting-bias hypothesis. Am. Nat. 170 : 10 20.
24. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W.R., Lutz, R. Vrijenhoek, R.C. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3 : 294 299.
25. Fryer, G. 1987. A new classification of the branchiopod crustacea. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91 : 357 383.
26. Ghiselin, M.T. 1969. The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 44 : 189 208.
27. Ghiselin, M.T. 1974. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
28. Harrington, R.W. 1963. Twenty-four hour rhythms of internal self-fertilization and of oviposition by hermaphrodites of Rivulus marmoratus. Physiol. Zool. 36 : 325 341.
29. Henry, M. 1924. A monograph of the freshwater Entomostraca of New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW 49 : 120 137.
30. Hoeh, W.R., Smallwood, N.D., Senyo, D.M., Chapman, E.G. Weeks, S.C. 2006. Evaluating the monophyly of Eulimnadia and the Limnadiinae (Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata) using DNA sequences. J. Crustacean Biol. 26 : 182 192.
31. Huelsenbeck, J.P. Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 755.
32. Jarne, P. Auld, J.R. 2006. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60 : 1816 1824.
33. Jarne, P. Charlesworth, D. 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24 : 441 466.
34. Kiontke, K., Gavin, N.P., Raynes, Y., Roehrig, C., Piano, F. Fitch, D.H.A. 2004. Caenorhabditis phylogeny predicts convergence of hermaphroditism and extensive intron loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 9003 9008.
35. Knoll, L. 1995. Mating-behavior and time budget of an androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Conchostraca). Hydrobiologia 298 : 73 81. (Pubitemid 26448871)
36. Koepfli, K.P., Deere, K.A., Slater, G.J., Begg, C., Begg, K., Grassman, L., Lucherini, M., Veron, G. Wayne, R.K. 2008. Multigene phylogeny of the Mustelidae: resolving relationships, tempo and biogeographic history of a mammalian adaptive radiation. BMC Biol. Vol. 6, article 10.
37. Lewis, P.O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50 : 913 925.
38. Lloyd, D.G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45 : 325 339.
39. Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Godfray, H.C.J., West, S.A., Hansson, C. Cook, J.M. 2005. The evolution of host use and unusual reproductive strategies in Achrysocharoides parasitoid wasps. J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 1029 1041.
40. Lyer, P. Roughgarden, J. 2008. Dioecy as a specialization promoting sperm delivery. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10 : 867 892.
41. Maddison, W.P. Maddison, D.R. 2002. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.05. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, MA.
42. Maddison, W.P. Maddison, D.R. (2008) Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, Version 2.5. http://mesquiteproject.org
43. Marshall, D.C., Simon, C. Buckley, T.R. 2006. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst. Biol. 55 : 993 1003.
44. Mattox, N.T. 1950. Notes on the life history and description of a new species of conchostracan phyllopod, Caenestheriella gynecia. Trans. Amer. Micro. Soc. 69 : 50 53.
45. Medland, V.L., Zucker, N. Weeks, S.C. 2000. Implications for the maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana Packard: encounters between males and hermaphrodites are not random. Ethology 106 : 839 848.
46. Moczek, A.P., Cruickshank, T.E. Shelby, A. 2006. When ontogeny reveals what phylogeny hides: gain and loss of horns during development and evolution of horned beetles. Evolution 60 : 2329 2341.
47. Murphy, N.P., Carey, D., Castro, L.R., Dowton, M. Austin, A.D. 2007. Phylogeny of the platygastroid wasps (Hymenoptera) based on sequences from the 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase I genes: implications for the evolution of the ovipositor system and host relationships. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 91 : 653 669.
48. Negrea, S., Botnariuc, N. Dumont, H.J. 1999. Phylogeny, evolution and classification of the Branchiopoda (Crustacea). Hydrobiologia 412 : 191 212.
49. Obbard, D.J., Harris, S.A. Pannell, J.R. 2006. Sexual systems and population genetic structure in an annual plant: testing the metapopulation model. Am. Nat. 167 : 354 366.
50. Olesen, J., Martin, J.W. Roessler, E.W. 1996. External morphology of the male of Cyclestheria hislopi (Baird, 1859) (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata), with a comparison of male claspers among the Conchostraca and Cladocera and its bearing on phylogeny of the 'bivalved' Branchiopoda. Zool. Scr. 25 : 291 316.
51. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48 : 612 622.
52. Pannell, J.R. 1997. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51 : 10 20.
53. Pannell, J.R. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 : 397 425.
54. Pannell, J.R. 2008. Consequences of inbreeding depression due to sex-linked loci for the maintenance of males and outcrossing in branchiopod crustaceans. Genet. Res. 90 : 73 84.
55. Pannell, J.R., Dorken, M.E., Pujol, B. Berjano, R. 2008. Gender variation and transitions between sexual systems in Mercurialis annua (Euphorbiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 169 : 129 139.
56. Park, J.-K. O'Foighil, O. 2000. Sphaeriid and corbiculid clams represent separate heterodont bivalve radiations into freshwater environments. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14 : 75 88.
57. Richter, S. Timms, B.V. 2005. A list of the recent clam shrimps (Crustacea: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cyclestherida) of Australia, including a description of a new species of Eocyzicus. Rec. Aust. Mus. 57 : 341 354.
58. Richter, S., Olesen, J. Wheeler, W.C. 2007. Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) based on a combined analysis of morphological data and six molecular loci. Cladistics 23 : 301 336.
59. Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J.L., Marin, A. Medina, J.R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142 : 485 501.
60. Ronquist, F. Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19 : 1572 1574.
61. Rossi, V., Gandolfi, A., Baraldi, F., Bellavere, C. Menozzi, P. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships of coexisting Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) lineages with different reproductive modes from Lampedusa Island (Italy). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44 : 1273 1283.
62. Sargent, R.D. Otto, S.P. 2004. A phylogenetic analysis of pollination mode and the evolution of dichogamy in angiosperms. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 : 1183 1199.
63. Sassaman, C. 1988. Clutch sex-ratio polymorphism in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia antlei. Am. Zool. 28 : A135.
64. Sassaman, C. 1989. Inbreeding and sex-ratio variation in female-biased populations of a clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Bull. Mar. Sci. 45 : 425 432.
65. Sassaman, C. 1990. Inheritance of a sex-linked locus in the clam shrimp Eocyzicus concavus (Mackin). Am. Zool. 30 : A108.
66. Sassaman, C. 1995. Sex determination and evolution of unisexuality in the Conchostraca. Hydrobiologia 298 : 45 65.
67. Sassaman, C. Weeks, S.C. 1993. The genetic mechanism of sex determination in the conchostracan shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Am. Nat. 141 : 314 328. (Pubitemid 23402360)
68. Sayce, O.A. 1903. The Phyllopoda of Australia, including descriptions of some new genera and species. Proc. R. Soc. Vic. 15 : 224 261.
69. Scanabissi, F. Mondini, C. 2002. A survey of the reproductive biology in Italian branchiopods. Hydrobiologia 486 : 263 272.
70. Scanabissi Sabelli, F.S. Tommasini, S. 1990. Origin and early development of female germ-cells in Eoleptestheria ticinensis Balsamo-Crivelli, 1859 (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Conchostraca). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 26 : 47 52.
71. Scanabissi Sabelli, F.S. Tommasini, S. 1994. Functional morphology and ultrastructure of the male reproductive system in the Leptestheriidae (Branchiopoda, Conchostraca). Crustaceana 67 : 362 370.
72. Schemske, D.W. Lande, R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 2. Empirical observations. Evolution 39 : 41 52. (Pubitemid 16276774)
73. Spears, T. Abele, L.G. 2000. Branchiopod monophyly and interordinal phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA. J. Crustacean Biol. 20 : 1 24.
74. Straskraba, M. 1964. Taxonomic studies on Czechoslovak chonchostraca, 1. Family Limnadiidae. Crustaceana 9 : 263 273.
75. Surget-Groba, Y., Heulin, B., Guillaume, C.P., Puky, M., Semenov, D., Orlova, V., Kupriyanova, L., Ghira, I. Smajda, B. 2006. Multiple origins of viviparity, or reversal from viviparity to oviparity? The European common lizard (Zootoca vivipara, Lacertidae) and the evolution of parity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87 : 1 11.
76. Tinti, F. Scanabissi, F. 1996. Reproduction and genetic variation in clam shrimps (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Conchostraca). Can. J. Zool. 74 : 824 832.
77. Ward, S. Carrel, J.S. 1979. Fertilization and sperm competition in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 73 : 304 321.
78. Webb, J.A. Bell, G.D. 1979. A new species of Limnadia (Crustacea: Conchostraca) from the granite belt in southern Queensland and Northern New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW 103 : 237 246.
79. Weeks, S.C. Bernhardt, R.L. 2004. Maintenance of androdioecy in the freshwater shrimp, Eulimnadia texana: field estimates of inbreeding depression and relative male survival. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 : 227 242.
80. Weeks, S.C., Marcus, V. Alvarez, S. 1997. Notes on the life history of the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359 : 191 197.
81. Weeks, S.C., Marcus, V. Crosser, B.R. 1999. Inbreeding depression in a self-compatible, androdioecious crustacean, Eulimnadia texana. Evolution 53 : 472 483.
82. Weeks, S.C., Crosser, B.R. Gray, M.M. 2001. Relative fitness of two hermaphroditic mating types in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 83 94.
83. Weeks, S.C., Posgai, R.T., Cesari, M. Scanabissi, F. 2005. Androdioecy inferred in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia agassizii (Spinicaudata: Limnadiidae). J. Crustacean Biol. 25 : 323 328.
84. Weeks, S.C., Benvenuto, C. Reed, S.K. 2006a. When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46 : 449 464.
85. Weeks, S.C., Reed, S.K., Cesari, M. Scanabissi, F. 2006b. Production of intersexes and the evolution of androdioecy in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 49 : 113 119. (Pubitemid 44264444)
86. Weeks, S.C., Sanderson, T.F., Reed, S.K., Zofkova, M., Knott, B., Balaraman, U., Pereira, G., Senyo, D.M. Hoeh, W.R. 2006c. Ancient androdioecy in the freshwater crustacean Eulimnadia. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273 : 725 734.
87. Weeks, S.C., Sanderson, T.F., Zofkova, M. Knott, B. 2008. Breeding systems in the clam shrimp family Limnadiidae (Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata). Invertebr. Biol. 127 : 336 349.
88. Weiblen, G.D., Oyama, R.K. Donoghue, M.J. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of dioecy in monocotyledons. Am. Nat. 155 : 46 58.
89. Wolf, D.E. Takebayashi, N. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. Am. Nat. 163 : 122 137.
90. Zaffagnini, F. 1969. Rudimentary hermaphroditism and automictic parthenogenesis in Limnadia lenticularis (Phyllopoda, Conchostraca). Experientia 25 : 650 651.
91. Zucker, N., Cunningham, M. Adams, H.P. 1997. Anatomical evidence for androdioecy in the clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana. Hydrobiologia 359 : 171 175.
92. Zucker, N., Aguilar, G.A., Weeks, S.C. McCandless, L.G. 2002. Impact of males on variation in the reproductive cycle in an androdioecious desert shrimp. Invertebr. Biol. 121 : 66 72.
93. Zwickl, D.J. (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. PhD Thesis, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA