Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde-sensitive subjects: Results and methodological aspects

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 165-171

  Johansen, J D ^a,d   Andersen, K E ^b   Rastogi, S C ^c   Menne T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c D   (Denmark)

^d GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Cinnamic aldehyde; Dose response; Fragrances; Graded use test; Hazard assessment; Persistence of sensitization; Relevance of patch test reactions; Serial dilution patch test

Indexed keywords

CINNAMALDEHYDE; COSMETIC;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; ECZEMA; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATCH TEST; PATIENT COUNSELING;

ACROLEIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ECZEMA; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ETHANOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PETROLATUM; SKIN; TIME FACTORS; VEHICLES;

EID: 0029990984     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02167.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen K E, Volund Aa. Potency evaluation of contact allergens. Dose-response studies using the Guinea Pig Maximization test. Nordiske Seminar-og Arbejdsrapporter 1993: 570.
2. Marzulli F N, Maibach H I. Contact allergy: predictive testing of fragrance ingredients in humans by Draize and Maximization methods. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 1980: 3: 235-245.
3. Johansen J D, Menné T. The fragrance mix and its constituents : a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 18-23.
4. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch testing with fragrance mix at 16% and 8%, and its individual constituents. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 237-238.
5. De Groot A C, Van der Kley A M J, Bruynzeel D P, Meinardi M H M, Smeenk G, Van Joost Th., Pavel S. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 139-140.
6. Schnorr W F. Cinnamic aldehyde allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1975: 1: 108-111
7. Friedmann P S, Moss C, Shuster S, Simpson J M. Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 1983: 53: 709-715.
8. Marzulli F N, Maibach H I. The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: Experimental contact sensitization in man. Fd Cosmet Toxicol 1974: 12: 219-227.
9. Kligman A M. The identification of contact allergens by human assay (II). Factors influencing the induction and measurement of allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Derm 1966: 47: 375-392.
10. Shuster S. Patch-test sensitivity and reproducebility in individuals and populations. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1992: 3: 74-78
11. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Dermato venereologica 1970:50: 287-92.
12. Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to cosmetic products. 6th amendment.
13. Opdyke D L J. Cinnamic aldehyde. Fragrance raw materials monographs. Fd Cosmet Toxicol 1979: 17: 253-57
14. Hannuksela M. The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 1986: 14: 221-227.
15. Fries W, Jekle K. Investigation of the dosing accuracy of atomizer pumps compared to the accuracy of aerosol dosing valves. Drugs made in Germany 1983: XXVI: 31-35.
16. Rastogi S C, Jensen G H, Johansen E. Chromatographic analysis of some fragrances in cosmetics and toiletries. NERI Technical report no. 106. Ministry of Environment. National Environmental Research Institute 1994.
17. De Groot A C. Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1987: 17: 26-34.
18. Adams R M, Maibach H I. A five-year study of cosmetic reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985: 13: 1062-1069.
19. Danneman P J, Booman K A, Dorsky J et al. Cinnamic aldehyde: a survey of consumer patch-test sensitization. Fd Chem Toxic 1983: 21: 721-25.
20. Kreilgård B, Hansen J. Aspects of pharmaceutical and chemical standardization of patch test materials. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 21: 836-838.
21. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Commom fragrance and flavor materials, 2nd edition. Wienheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft 1990: 4
22. Mclelland J, Shuster S, Matthews J N S. 'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1991: 27: 1016-1019.
23. Mclelland J, Shuster S. Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination. Br Jour Derm 1990: 122: 623-630.
24. Jordan W P, Sherman W T, King S E. Treshold responses in formaldehyde-sensitive subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 44-48.
25. Menné T, Calvin G. Concentration threshold of non-occluded nickel exposure in nickel-sensitive individuals and controls with and without surfactant. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 180-184
26. Epstein W L. The use test for contact hypersensitivity. Arch Dermatol Res 1982: 272 :279-281
27. Hannuksela M. Sensitivity of Various Skin Sites in the Repeated Open Application Test. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1991: 2: 102-104.
28. Prystowsky S D, Nonomura J H, Smith R W, Allen A M. Allergic hypersensitivity ot neomycin. Arch Dermatol 1979: 115: 713-715.
29. Menné T, Frosch P, Veien N et al. Contact sensitization to 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (MCI/MI): A European multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 24: 334-341
30. Frosch P J, Pilz B, Burrows D et al. Testing with fragrance mix. Is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 266-272.
31. Peter C, Hoting E. Anwendungstest mit parfumierten Kosmetika bei Patienten mit positivem epikutantest auf Duftstoff-Mischung. Dermatosen 1993: 41: 237-41
32. Basketter D A, Allenby C F. Studies of the quenching phenomenon in delayed contact hypersenstivity reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 160-171
33. Berrigter G H, Scheper R J. Local and systemic desensitization induced by repeated epicutaneous hapten application. J Invest Dermatol 1987: 1: 3-7.