Structure-activity relationships for selected fragrance allergens

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 219-226

  Patlewicz, G Y ^a   Wright, Z M ^a   Basketter, D A ^a   Pease, C K ^a   Lepoittevin, J P ^b   Arnau, E Giménez ^b  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Aldehydes; Chemical basis; Relative alkylation index; Structure activity relationships

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; ALLERGEN; FRAGRANCE; SCHIFF BASE;

ALLERGENICITY; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; LYMPH NODE; ODOR; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALDEHYDES; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0036823303     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.470406.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lepoittevin J-P. Development of structure-activity relationships (SARs) in allergic contact dermatitis. Cell Biol Toxicol 1999: 15: 47-55.
2. Kimber I. Epidermal cytokines in contact hypersensitivity: immunological roles and practical applications. Toxicol Vitro 1993: 7: 295-298.
3. Barratt M D, Basketter D A, et al. Structure-activity relationships for contact hypersensitivity. In: Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter D A, Goossens A, Karlberg A-T, eds. Allergic Contact Dermatitis. The Molecular Basis. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1997: 129-154.
4. Roberts D W, Williams D L. The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physico-chemical parameters for alkylating agents and their application to experimental data for sultones. J Theor Biol 1982: 99: 807-825.
5. Roberts D W, Basketter D A. Further evaluation of the quantitative structure-activity relationship for skin-sensitizing alkyl transfer agents. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 107-112.
6. Roberts D W, Basketter D A. Quantitative structure-activity relationships: sulfonate esters in the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 154-161.
7. Enslein K, Gombar V K, Blake B W, et al. A quantitative structure-toxicity relationships model for the dermal sensitization guinea pig maximization assay. Food Chem Toxicol 1997: 35: 1091-1098.
8. Basketter D A, Roberts D W, Cronin M, Scholes E W. The value of the local lymph-node assay in quantitative structure-activity investigations. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 137-142.
9. Basketter D A, Gerberick G F, Kimber I, Loveless S E. The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 1996: 34: 985-997.
10. Basketter D A, Lea L J, Dickens A, et al. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose-responses. J Appl Toxicol 1999: 19: 261-266.
11. Patlewicz G Y, Basketter D A, Smith C K, Hotchkiss S A M, Roberts D W. Skin-sensitization structure-activity relationships for aldehydes. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 331-336.
12. Basketter D A, Scholes E W, Kimber I, et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of the local lymph node assay with 25 chemicals and comparison with guinea pig test data. Toxicol Methods 1991: 1: 30-43.
13. Leo A, Hansch C. Substituent constants for correlation analysis in chemistry and biology. Wiley, New York, 1979.
14. Perrin D D, Dempsey B, Serjeant E P. pKa Prediction for Organic Acids and Bases. London: Chapman & Hall, 1981: 109-126.
15. Roberts D W. QSAR issues in aquatic toxicity of surfactants. Sci Tot Environ 1991: 109/110: 557-568.