Safety of cerebral digital subtraction angiography in children: Complication rate analysis in 241 consecutive diagnostic angiograms

Stroke

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2535-2539

  Burger, Ingrid M ^a   Murphy, Kieran J ^a   Jordan, Lori C ^a   Tamargo, Rafael J ^a   Gailloud, Philippe ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheter based angiography; Children; Complications

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHILD; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; POSTERIOR FOSSA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

ADOLESCENT; AMOBARBITAL; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTERIAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MALE;

EID: 33749019449     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000239697.56147.77     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC. Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:624-631; discussion 630-631.
2. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N, Uchiyama Y, Kojima K, Fujimoto K, Norbash AM, Hayabuchi N. Clinical benefits of rotational 3D angiography in endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:686-688.
3. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Suginohara K, Ono K, Nishi T, Uemura S, Yamura M, Yamashita Y. Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1067-1074.
4. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M. Comparison of three-dimensional rotational angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1199-1205.
5. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1545-1552.
6. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:317-320.
7. Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H. Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA: complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology. 1990;32:296-299.
8. Pettersson H, Fitz CR, Harwood-Nash DC, Chuang S, Armstrong E. Iatrogenic embolization: complication of pediatric cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1981;2:357-361.
9. Lynch JK, Hirtz DG, DeVeber G, Nelson KB. Report of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop on perinatal and childhood stroke. Pediatrics. 2002;109:116-123.
10. deVeber G. Arterial ischemic strokes in infants and children: an overview of current approaches. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:567-573.
11. Fullerton H, Lynch JK, deVeber G. The call for multicenter studies of pediatric stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:330-331.
12. Kuhle S, Mitchell L, Andrew M, Chan AK, Massicotte P, Adams M, deVeber G. Urgent clinical challenges in children with ischemic stroke: analysis of 1065 patients from the 1-800-NOCLOTS pediatric stroke telephone consultation service. Stroke. 2006;37:116-122.
13. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, Flom RA, Bird CR, Drayer BP, Fram EK. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1401-1407; discussion 1408-1411.
14. Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, Barnett HJ, Blom RJ. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke. 1987;18:997-1004.
15. Girod DA, Hurwitz RA, Caldwell RL. Heparinization for prevention of thrombosis following pediatric percutaneous arterial catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol. 1982;3:175-180.
16. Grady RM, Eisenberg PR, Bridges ND. Rational approach to use of heparin during cardiac catheterization in children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:725-729.
17. Cavallini M, Baruffaldi Preis FW, Casati A. Effects of mild hypothermia on blood coagulation in patients undergoing elective plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:316-321; discussion 322-323.
18. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on 'point/counterpoint: in x-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size: against the proposition.' Med Phys. 2001;28:2387-2388.
19. Suleiman OH. Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34(suppl 3):S242-S246.
20. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, Wilde P, Oberhoff M, Karsch KR, Baumbach A. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1840-1845.
21. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology. 2004;232:126-132.
22. Kuiper JW, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NA, Teeuwisse W, Pattynama PM. Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1496-1500.
23. Gyepes MT. Angiography in Infants and Children. New York and London: Grune & Stratton; 1974.
24. Zimmerman RA. Past, present and future of pediatric neuroradiology. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15:624-634.