Dynamic 3-D contrast-enhanced angiography of cerebral tumours and vascular malformations

European Radiology, Supplement

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2007, Pages

  Reinacher, Peter ^a   Reinges, Marcus H T ^a   Simon, Verena A ^a   Hans, Franz J ^a   Krings, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arteriovenous malformation; Digital subtraction angiography; Dural AV fistulae; Embolization; Meningeoma; MR angiography; Radio surgery

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; IOPAMIDOL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN SURGERY; BRAIN TUMOR; BRAIN VEIN; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR MALFORMATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MENINGIOMA; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MEGLUMINE; MENINGIOMA; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 40449117727     PISSN: 16133749     EISSN: 16133757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10406-007-0229-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Unlu E, Temizoz O, Albayram S et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR 3D angiography in the assessment of brain AVMs. Eur J Radiol 60(3):367-378
2. Goto T, Ohata K, Morino M et al (2006) Falcotentorial meningioma: surgical outcome in 14 patients. J Neurosurg 104(1):47-53
3. Chan RC, Thompson GB (1984) Morbidity, mortality, and quality of life following surgery for intracranial meningiomas. A retrospective study in 257 cases. J Neurosurg 60(1):52-60
4. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA et al (1994) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15(8):1401-1407; discussion 1408-1411
5. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Burger R et al (1999) Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A prospective study. Lancet 354(9190):1594-1597
6. Krings T, Willmes K, Becker R et al (2006) Silent microemboli related to diagnostic cerebral angiography: A matter of operator's experience and patient's disease. Neuroradiology 48(6):387-393
7. U-King-Im JM, Hollingworth W, Trivedi RA et al (2004) Contrastenhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: Activity-based cost analysis. Eur Radiol 14(4):730-735
8. Hans FJ, Reinges MH, Reipke P et al (2005) Clinical applications of 2-D dynamic contrast-enhanced MR subtraction angiography in neurosurgery - preliminary results. Zentralbl Neurochir 66(4):170-179
9. Krings T, Hans F (2004) New developments in MRA: Time-resolved MRA. Neuroradiology 46[Suppl 2]:s214-s222
10. Mori H, Aoki S, Masumoto T et al (2002) Two-dimensional magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography using array spatial sensitivity encoding techniques in the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics. Radiat Med 20(5):223-229
11. Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J (2003) MR digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of meningiomas. Eur J Radiol 46(2):130-138
12. Yoshikawa T, Aoki S, Hori M et al (2000) Time-resolved two-dimensional thick-slice magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography in assessing brain tumors. Eur Radiol 10(5):736-744
13. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT et al (2002) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 12(12):2957-2964
14. Frydrychowicz A, Bley TA, Winterer JT et al (2006) Accelerated timeresolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T: Clinical experience in 31 patients. Magma 19(4):187-195
15. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C et al (2005) Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(6):1525-1531
16. Gauvrit JY, Oppenheim C, Nataf F et al (2006) Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol 16(3):583-591
17. Liu J, Redmond MJ, Brodsky EK et al (2006) Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(2):148-157
18. Ziyeh S, Strecker R, Berlis A et al (2005) Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra- and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: A technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(3):630-634
19. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R et al (2002) Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: Initial experience. Radiology 225(2):583-588
20. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT et al (1993) "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 3(4):671-675
21. Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L et al (1995) Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: Clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 194(3):671-680
22. Stracke CP, Spuentrup E, Reinacher P et al (2006) Time resolved 3D MRA. Applications for interventional neuroradiology. Intervent Neuroradiol 12(3):223-233
23. Vougioukas VI, Coulin CJ, Shah M et al (2006) Benefits and limitations of image guidance in the surgical treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148(2):145-153; discussion 153
24. Nagaraja S, Lee KJ, Coley SC et al (2006) Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: Quantitative MR assessment of nidal response at 1 year and angiographic factors predicting early obliteration. Neuroradiology 48(11):821-829