Science as a social institution: Classic and modern institutionalisms in the sociology of science;La ciencia como institución social: Clásicos y modernos institucionalismos en la sociología de la ciencia

Arbor

Volumn 185, Issue 738, 2009, Pages 663-687

  Fernández Esquinas, Manuel ^a   Torres Albero, Cristóbal ^b  

^a Associated Unit to CSIC by IESA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

New institutionalism; Social institutions; Social norms; Sociology of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 68649085895     PISSN: 02101963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3989/arbor.2009.738n1045     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Barnes, B. y Dolby, R. G. A. (1970): "The scientific ethos: a deviant viewpoint", Archive of European Sociology, 11.
2. Barnes, B. y Edge, D. (eds.) (1982): Science in context, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
3. Ben-David, J. (1977): Organization, social control and cognitive change in science, en J. Ben-David y T. Nichols (eds.), Culture and its creators, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Berger, P. y Luckmann, Th. (1968): La construcción social de la realidad, Buenos Aires, Amorrortu.
5. Berman, E. P. (2008): "Why Did Universities Start Patenting?: Institution-building and the Road to the Bayh-Dole Act." Social Studies of Science, 38 (6), pp. 36-58.
6. Braun, D. (1998): "The Role of Funding Agencies in the Cognitive Development of Science", Research Policy, 27, pp. 807-821.
7. Brinton, M. C., y Nee, V. (1998): The new institutionalism in sociology, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
8. Broad, W. y Wade, N. (1982): Betrayers of the Truth, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
9. Cole, J. y Cole, S. (1973): Social stratification in science, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
10. Colyvas, J. (2007a): "Factories, Hazards, and Contamination: Metaphors and Recombinant DNA in University and Biotechnology", Minerva, 45, pp. 143-159.
11. Colyvas, J. (2007b): "From Divergent Meanings to Common Practices: The Early Institutionalization of Technology Transfer in the Life Sciences at Stanford University", Research Policy, 36, pp. 456-476.
12. Colyvas, J. y Powell, W. (2006): "Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science", Research in Organizational Behaviour, 27, pp. 315-363.
13. Cortgrove, S. y Box, S. (1970): Science, Industry and Society. Studies in the Sociology of Science, Londres, George Allen and Undwin.
14. Crane, D. (1975): Invisible Colleges, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
15. Dietz, J. S. y Bozeman, B. (2005): "Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital", Research Policy, 34, pp. 349-367.
16. DiMaggio, P. y Powell, W. (1983): "The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields", American Sociological Review, 48, pp. 147-160.
17. DiMaggio, P. y Powell, W. (1991): The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
18. Dooris, M. y Fairweather, J. (1994): "Structure and culture in faculty work: implications for technology transfer", The Review of Higher Education, 17 (2), pp. 161-177.
19. Drori, G.; Meyer, J.; Ramírez, F. y Schofer, E. (2003): Science in the modern world: institutionalization and globalization, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
20. Fernández Esquinas, M. (2002): La formación de investigadores científicos en España, Madrid, CIS-Siglo XXI.
21. Fernández Esquinas, M.; Pérez Yruela, M. y Merchán Hernández, C. (2006): "El sistema de incentivos y recompensas en la ciencia pública española", en Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (coords.), Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.
22. Fox, M. F. (1983): "Publication productivity among scientists: a critical review", Social Studies of Science, 13, pp. 285-305.
23. Gaston, J. (1978): The reward system in British and American science, Wiley & Sons, New York.
24. Georghiou, L. y Laredo, P. (eds.) (2006): Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research. Recent Trends and Perspectives, Paris, OCDE.
25. Gibbons, M. et al. (1994): The new production of Knowledge, Londres, Sage.
26. Godin, B. (1998): "Writting performative history: the New Atlantis?", Social Studies of Science, 28, 465-483.
27. Gorges, M. J. (2001): "New institutionalist explanations for institutional change: A note of caution", Politics, 21 (2), pp. 137-145.
28. Hagstrom, W. (1965): The scientific community, Basic Books, New York.
29. Hall, P. A. y Taylor, R. C. (1996): "Political Science and the three New Institutionalisms", Political Studies, 44 (6), p. 22.
30. Hasse, R. y Gill, B. (1994): "Biotechnological research in Germany. Problems of political regulation and public acceptance", en Schimank, U. y Stucke, A. (eds.), Coping with trouble. How science reacts to political disturbances of research conditions, Frankfurt-New York, Campus Verlag-St. Martin's Press.
31. Hedström, P. y Swedberg, R. (1999): An Analytical approach to social theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
32. Hackett, E. (2001): "Science as a vocation in the 1990's: the changing organizational culture of academic science", en Croissant, J. y Restivo, S. (eds.), Degrees of compromise. Industrial interests and academic values, New York, SUNY Press.
33. Hemlin, S.; Allwoodg, C. M. y Martin, B. (eds.) (2003): Creative knowledge environments. Micro and macro studies of R&D and Higher Education, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
34. Iranzo, J. M.; Blanco, J. R.; González de la Fe, T.; Torres, C. y Cotillo, A. (eds.) (1995): Sociología de la ciencia y la tecnología, Madrid, CSIC.
35. Jang, Y. (2000): "The worldwide funding of ministries of science and technology, 1950-1900", Sociological Perspectives, 43 (2), pp. 247-270.
36. Jasanoff, S.; Markle, G. E.; Petersen, J. C. y Pinch, T. (eds.) (1995): Handbook of science and technology studies, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
37. Jepperson, R. (2002): "The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism", en Berger, J. y Zelditch, M. (eds.), New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, Nueva York, Rowman & Littlefield.
38. Kleinman, D. y Valias, S. (2001): "Science, capitalism and the rise of 'knowledge worker': The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States", Theory and Society, 30 (4), pp. 451-492.
39. Kornhauser, W. (1962): Scientists in industry. Conflict and accommodation, Berkeley, University of California Press.
40. Kuhn, Th. S. (1971): La estructura de las revoluciones científicas, México, FCE.
41. Latour, B. y Woolgar, S. (1979): Laboratory life, Sage, Londres.
42. Lecours, A. (2005): New Institutionalism - Theory and Analysis, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
43. Long, S. y Fox, M. F. (1995): "Scientific careers: universalism and particularism", Annual Review of Sociology, 21, pp. 45-71.
44. Mahoney, J. (2000): "Path dependence in historical sociology", Theory and society, 29, pp. 42-53.
45. March, J. G. y Olsen, J. P. (1984): "The New Institutionalism: organizational factors in political life", American political science review, 78, pp. 16-34.
46. Merton, R. K. (1984): Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en la Inglaterra del siglo XVII, Madrid, Alianza Universidad.
47. Merton, R. K. (1977c): "La ambivalencia de los cientí ficos", en Ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en la Inglaterra del siglo XVII, op. cit., 1977.
48. Merton, R. K. (1980): Ambivalencia sociológica y otros ensayos, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.
49. Merton, R. K. (1977): La sociología de la ciencia, Madrid, Alianza Universidad.
50. Merton, R. K. (1980): Teoría y estructura sociales, México, FCE.
51. Meyer, J. W. y Rowan, B. (1977): "Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83, pp. 340-363.
52. Mitroff, I. (1974): "The Apollo Moon Scientist: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists", American Sociological Review, 39, pp. 579-595.
53. Moore, K. (1996): "Organizing integrity: American Science and the creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955-1975", American Journal of Sociology, 101 (6), pp. 1592-1627.
54. Moore, K. y Frickel, S. (eds.) (2007): The New Political Economy of Science: Institutions, Networks, Power, Michigan, University of Wisconsin Press.
55. Mulkay, M. (1969): "Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences", Social Research, 36, pp. 22-52.
56. Mulkay, M. (1976): "Norms and ideology in science", Social Science Information, 15, pp. 637-656.
57. Mulkay, M. (1979): "Interpretation and the use of rules: The case of norms of science", en Gieryn, T. (ed.), A festschrift for Robert K. Merton, New York, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II, vol. 39.
58. Olazaran, M. y Torres Albero, C. (1995): "Para una reorientación de la sociología del conocimiento científico", Sistema, 125.
59. Owen-Smith, J. (2005): "Trends and Transitions in the Institutional Environment for Public and Private Science", Journal of Higher Education, 49 (1-2), pp. 91-117.
60. Owen-Smith, J. (2003): "From Separate Systems to a Hybrid Order: Accumulative Advantage Across Public and Private Science at Research One Universities", Research Policy, 32 (6), pp. 1081-1104.
61. Owen-Smith, J. y Powell, W. (2001): "Careers and Contradictions: Faculty Responses to the Transformation of Knowledge and Its Uses in the Life Sciences", Research in the Sociology of Work, 10, pp. 109-140.
62. Parsons, T. (1982): El sistema social, Madrid, Alianza Universidad.
63. Prelli, L. J. (1989): "The rhetorical construction of scientific ethos", en Simons, H. W. (ed.), Rethoric in the Human Sciences, Sage, Londres.
64. Powell, W. (2007): "The new institutionalism", en Clegg, S. R. y Bailey, J. R. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
65. Powell, W. y Colyvas, J. (2007): "Microfundations of institutional theories", en Greenwood, R. et al. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
66. Powell, W. y Owen-Smith, J. (1998): "Universities and the Market for Intellectual Property in the Life Sciences", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17 (2), pp. 253-277.
67. Powell, W.; Owen-Smith, J. y Colyvas, J. (2007): "Innovation and Emulation: Lessons from the Experiences of US Universities in Selling Private Rights to Public Knowledge", Minerva, 45, pp. 143-159.
68. Powell, W.; White, D.; Koput, K. y Owen-Smith, J. (2005): "Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences", American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4), pp. 74-110.
69. Rothman, M. (1972): "A dissenting view on the scientific ethos", The British Journal of Sociology, 23, pp. 102-108.
70. Sancho, R. (1990): "Indicadores bibliométricos utilizados en la evaluación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Revisión bibliográfica", Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 13 (4), pp. 842-65.
71. Schneider, M. y Clemens, E. (2006): "The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis", Sociological Theory, 24, pp. 195-227.
72. Scott, J. C. (1990): Domination and the art of resistance. The hidden transcripts, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
73. Scott, R. (2001): Institutions and organizations, Second edition, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
74. Scott, R. (2005): "Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program", en Smith, K. y Hitt, M. (eds.), Greats minds in management: The process of theory development, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
75. Searle, J. (2005): "What is an Institution?", Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (1), pp. 1-22.
76. Selznick, P. (1996): "Institutionalism 'old' and 'new'", Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
77. Sklair, L. (1972): "The political sociology of science", The Sociological Review Monograph, 18, pp. 43-59.
78. Smith-Doerr, L.; Owen-Smith, J.; Koput, K. y Powell, W. (1999): "Networks and Knowledge Production: Collaboration and Patenting in Biotechnology", en Leenders, R. T. A. J. y Gabbay, S. (eds.), Corporate Social Capital and Liability, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
79. Stinchcombe, A. (1997): "On the virtues of the Old Institutionalism", Annual Review of Sociology, 23, pp. 1-18.
80. Torres Albero, C. (1994): Sociología política de la ciencia, Madrid, CIS-Siglo XXI.
81. Webster, A. (1994): "University-corporate ties and the construction of research agendas", Sociology, 28, pp. 123-142.
82. Weick, K. E. (1995): Sensemaking in organisations, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
83. Weingart, P. (1997): "From 'finalization' to 'Mode 2': old wine in new bottles?", Social Science Information, 36, pp. 591-613.
84. Weingart, P.; Krücken, G. y Hasse, R. (1997): "Ciencia y entorno social: una aplicación del enfoque neoinstitucionalista a los estudios sociales de la ciencia", Revista Internacional de Sociología, 16, pp. 117-137.
85. Werle, R. (1998): "An institutional approach to technology", Science Studies, 11, pp. 3-18.
86. Whitley, R. (2002): "The intellectual and social organization of the sciences", Oxford, Clarendon Press.
87. Whitley, R. (2007): "Changing Governance of the Public Sciences. The Consequences of Establishing Research Evaluation Systems for Knowledge Production in Different Countries and Scientific Fields", en Whitley, R. y Gläser, J. (eds.), The Changing governance of the Science. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, Kluwer, Springer Netherlands.
88. Wilts, A. (2000): "Forms of research organizations and their responsiveness to external goal setting", Research Policy, 29, pp. 767-781.
89. Woolgar, S. (1991): "Beyond the citation debate: Towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy", Science and Public Policy, 18 (5), pp. .
90. Ziman, J. (1996): "'Postacademic science': constructing knowledge with networks and norms", Science Studies, 9.
91. Zuckerman, H. (1977): "Deviant behavior and social control in science", en Sagarin, E. (ed.), Deviance and social change, Londres, Sage.
92. Zuckerman, H. (1991): "The Sociology of Science", en Smelser, N. (ed.), Handbook of Sociology, Londres, Sage.