Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 767-781

  Wilts, Arnold ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actor centered institutionalism; Economics; Policy implications; Research organisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012162653     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00050-5     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allwood C.M. The function and handling of research problems in the social sciences. Science Studies. 10:1997;50-73.
2. Amendola M., Gaffard J.-L. Markets and organizations as coherent systems of innovation. Research Policy. 23:1994;627-635.
3. Barnes, B., 1990. Sociological theories of scientific knowledge. In: Olby, R.C., et al. (Eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science. Routledge, London, pp. 60-76.
4. Becher, G., 1995. Regulation and Innovation, Some prospects of science and technology policy in the Federal republic of Germany. In: Becher, G., Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.), Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 331-360.
5. Beise M., Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy. 28:1999;397-422.
6. Braun D. The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science. Research Policy. 27:1998;807-821.
7. Breslau D. Contract shop epistemology, credibility and problem construction in applied social sciences. Social Studies of Science. 27:1993;363-394.
8. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 1997. A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. In: Etkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.), Universities and the Global Economy, A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Pinter, London, pp. 155-162.
9. European Commission, 1998. Society, The Endless Frontier, A European Vision of Research and Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. EC, Brussels.
10. Fabisch, G., 1996. The impact of the European research and development policy on the German research system. In: Sturm, R. (Ed.), Europäische Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik und die Anforderungen des Subsidiaritätsprinzips. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 125-130.
11. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1993. The emergence of post-normal science. In: von Schomberg, R. (Ed.), Science, Politics and Morality, Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 85-126.
12. Gerlach, K., 1993. Anreizstruktur und Forschungsaktivitäten in wirtschaftwissenschaftlichen Fachbereichen. In: Schmidt-Schönbein, T. (Ed.), Die ökonomische Wissenschaft und ihr Betrieb. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 245-268.
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
14. Godin B. Writing performative history: the new Atlantis? Social Studies of Science. 28:1998;465-483. Review of Gibbons, M., et al., 1994, The New Production of Knowledge.
15. Hagendijk, R.P., 1990. Structuration theory, constructivism and scientific change. In: Cozzens, S., Gieryn, T. (Eds.), Theories of Science in Society. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 43-66.
16. Harley S., Lee F.S. Research selectivity, managerialism, and the academic labor process: the future of nonmainstream economics in UK universities. Human Relations. 50:1997;1427-1460.
17. Hartmann, I., 1990. Begutachtung in der Forschungsförderung, Die Argumente der Gutachter in der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Fischer, Frankfurt am Main.
18. Hasse R., Krücke G. Was Leistet der organisationssoziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus? Eine theoretische Auseinandersetzung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des wissenschaftlichen Wandels. Soziale Systeme. 2:1996;91-112.
19. Hicks D.M., Katz J.S. Where is science going? Science, Technology and Human Values. 21:1996;379-406.
20. Hill S.C. The formation of the identity as a scientist. Science Studies. 8:1995;53-72.
21. Hohn, H.-W., 1998. Kognitive Strukturen und Steuerungsprobleme der Forschung, Kernphysik und Informatik im Vergleich. Campus, Frankfurt am Main.
22. Hohn, H.-W., Schimank, U., 1990. Konflikte und Gleichgewichte im Forschungssystem, Akteurkonstellationen und Entwicklungspfade in der staatlich finanzierten außeruniversitären Forschung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main.
23. Jacob M. Life in the triple helix: the contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society. Science Studies. 10:1997;35-49.
24. Kazancigil A. Governance and science: market-like modes of managing society and producing knowledge. International Social Science Journal. 50:1998;69-79.
25. Kirman, A., Dahl, M., 1996. Economic research in Europe. EUI Monographs in Economics, European University Institute, Florence.
26. Knorr-Cetina, K.D., 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge, An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon, Oxford.
27. Künzel, R., 1996. Political control and funding, the future of state support. In: Ash, M.G. (Ed.), German Universities, Past and Future, Crisis or Renewal? Berghahn, Providence, pp. 164-175.
28. Latour, B., 1987. Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. Laudel, G., 1999. Interdisziplinäre Forschungskooperation, Erfolgsbedingungen der Institution Sonderforschungsbereich. Edition Sigma, Berlin.
30. Mayntz, R., 1985. Forschungsmanagement, Steuerungsversuche zwischen Scilla und Charybdis, Probleme der Organisation und Leitung von hochschulfreien, öffentlich finanzierten Forschungsinstituten. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
31. Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W., 1995. Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. In: Mayntz, R., Scharpf, F.W. (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 39-72.
32. Mayntz R., Schimank U. Linking theory and practice, introduction. Research Policy. 27:1998;747-755.
33. Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1990. Science and Technology in the Federal Republic of Germany. Longman, Harlow.
34. Mittelstraß, J., 1996. Coping with crisis - the German universities: their future role in teaching and research. In: Krull, W., Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Eds.), Science and Technology in Germany. Cartermill, London, pp. 101-109.
35. Nee, V., 1998. Sources of the new institutionalism. In: Brinton, M.C., Nee, V. (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Sociology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 1-16.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1998. Internationalisation of Industrial R&D: Patterns and Trends. OECD, Paris.
37. Pickering, A., 1992. From science as knowledge to science as practice. In: Pickering, A. (Ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1-26.
38. Restivo, S., 1995. The theory landscape in science studies, sociological traditions. In: Jasanoff, S., et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 95-110.
39. Rip A. The republic of science in the 1990s. Higher Education. 28:1994;3-23.
40. Scharpf, F.W., 1997. Games Real Actors Play, Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview Press, Boulder.
41. Schimank U. Für eine Erneuerung der institutionalistischen Wissenschaftssoziologie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 24:1995;42-57.
42. Schimank, U., 1996. Universities and extra-university research institutes, tensions within stable institutional structures. In: Krull, W., Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Eds.), Science and Technology in Germany. Cartermill, London, pp. 111-124.
43. Schmidt, S.K., Werle, R., 1997. Coordinating Technology, Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. MIT Press, Cambridge.
44. Schimank, U., Winnes, M., 1999. National Report: Federal Republic of Germany, European Comparison of Public Research Systems. TSER Project No. SOE1-CT96-1036. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.
45. Shapin S. Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology. 21:1995;289-321.
46. Shinn T. Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science Information. 38:1999;149-176.
47. Stehr, N., 1994. The Knowledge Society. Sage, London.
48. Stern, P., 1996. Prisoners of the Crystal Palace, Mapping and Understanding the Social and Cognitive Organization of Scientific Research Fields. Boréa, Umeå.
49. Stichweh, R., 1994. Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen, Soziologische Analysen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
50. Vanberg, V., 1994. Organizations as constitutional systems. In: Vanberg, V. (Ed.), Rules and Choice in Economics. Routledge, London, pp. 125-143.
51. Weingart P. From 'finalization' to 'mode 2': old wine in new bottles? Social Science Information. 36:1997;591-613.
52. Werle R. An institutional approach to technology. Science Studies. 11:1998;3-18.
53. Whitley, R., 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
54. Wilts, A.S., 1999. Institutionelle Vermittlungsmechanismen zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis, am Beispiel der außeruniversitären und universitären Wirtschaftsforschung in Deutschland. Research Report, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.
55. Wissenschaftsrat, 1998. Stellungnahme zu den Wirtschaftsforschungsinstituten der Blauen Liste in den alten Ländern. Drs. 3320/98. Wissenschaftsrat, Berlin.
56. Woolgar, S., 1988. Science: The Very Idea. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.