Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 336-353

  Collins, Laura ^a   Trofimovich, Pavel ^a   White, Joanna ^a   Cardoso, Walcir ^a   Horst, Marlise ^a  

^a Systematic Reviews Project Manager Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68449097368     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Ammar, A., & Lightbown, P. M. (2005). Teaching marked linguistic structures: More about the acquisition of relative clauses by Arab learners of English. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 167-199). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a "natural sequence" in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235-243.
3. Banathy, B. H., & Madarasz, P. H. (1969). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Journal of English as a Second Language, 4, 77-92.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 37, 385-407.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia, and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507-584.
7. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bayley, R. (1996). Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In R. Bayley & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 97-120). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
9. Berwick, R. C., & Weinberg, A. S. (1983). The role of grammars in models of language use. Cognition, 13, 1-61.
10. Bogaards, P., & Laufer, B. (Eds.). (2004). Vocabulary in a second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
13. Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Cardoso, W. (2007). The variable development of English word-final stops by Brazilian Portuguese speakers: A stochastic optimality theoretic account. Language Variation and Change, 19, 1-30.
15. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course (2nd. ed.). Boston: Heinle.
16. Cobb, T. Web Vocabprofile. Retrieved February, 2007, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/; an adaptation of Heatley & Nation's (1994) Range.
17. Collins, L. (2002). The role of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43-94.
18. Collins, L. (2004). The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 251-274.
19. Collins, L. (2005). Accessing second language learners' understanding of temporal morphology. Language Awareness, 14, 207-220.
20. Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2009). When comprehensible input isn't comprehensive input: A multi-dimensional analysis of past tense in classroom input. Manuscript in preparation.
21. Collins, L., & White, J. (2009). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. De Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-297.
23. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24. DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1-25.
25. DeKeyser, R. M. (2008). The complexities of defining complexity. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
26. de Lacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (Eds.) (1995). The acquisition of temporality in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
29. Doughty, C., & Williams J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245-258.
31. Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37-53.
32. Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330.
33. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
34. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-24.
35. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164-194.
36. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558-589.
37. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Fathman, A. (1975). Language background, age, and the order of acquisition of English structures. In M. K. Burt & H. C. Dulay (Eds.), On TESOL '75: New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education (pp. 33-43). Washington, DC: TESOL.
39. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
40. Granger, S. (1996). Romance words in English: From history to pedagogy. KVHAA Konforenser, 36, 105-121.
41. Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168-184.
42. Gregg, K. (1993). Taking explanation seriously, or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 276-294.
43. Heatley, A., & Nation, P. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ [Computer program]. Available at http://www.vuw.ac.nz/ lals/.
44. Hinkel, E., & Fotos, S. (Eds.). (2002). New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207-223.
46. Housen, A. (2002). The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 153-195). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
47. Housen, A., Pierrard M., & Van Daele, S. (2005). Rule complexity and the efficacy of explicit grammar instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 235-269). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
49. Hulstijn, J. H. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 359-386). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
50. Hulstijn, J. H., & De Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-112.
51. Izquierdo, J. (2007). Multimedia environments in the foreign language classroom: Effects on the acquisition of the French perfective and imperfective distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
52. Juffs, A. (1998). The acquisition of semantics-syntax correspondences and verb fequencies in ESL materials. English Language Teaching, 2, 93-123.
53. Kang Y. (2003). Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic wordfinal stops in Korean. Phonology, 20, 219-273.
54. Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessbility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-99.
55. Kellerman, E. (1978). Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 15, 59-92.
56. Kingston, J., & Shinya, T. (2003). Markedness asymmeties in place perception in consonant clusters. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 399-402.
57. Klein, W., & Perdue C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives: Vol. II. The results (pp. 3-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301-347.
59. Kupferberg, I., & Olshtain, E. (1996). Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. Language Awareness, 5, 149-165.
60. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
61. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1975). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 409-430.
62. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976a). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition of second languge learners. Language Learning, 26, 125-134.
63. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976b, June). ESL teacher speech as input to the ESL learner. TESL, 10, 45-59.
64. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. New York: Longman.
65. Lee, E. J. (2001). Interlanguage development with two Korean speakers of English with a focus on temporality. Language Learning, 51, 591-633.
66. Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
67. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563-579.
68. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.) (1999). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. McDonough, K., & Kim, Y. (2009). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learner's production of wh-questions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 386-398.
71. Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienneman, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.
72. Murphy, V. A. (2004). Dissociable systems in second language morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 433-459.
73. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Petrovitz, W. (2001). The sequencing of verbal-complement structures. ELT Journal, 55, 172-177.
75. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465-497.
76. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 177-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar (Technical Reports TR-2). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science [also Rutgers Optimality Archive 537].
78. Rice, K. (2007). Markedness. In P. de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology (pp. 79-97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Richards, J. C. (1971). Non-contrastive approach to error analysis. English Language Teaching, 25, 204-219.
80. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
81. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
82. Rohde, A. (1996). The aspect hypothesis and emergence of tense distinction in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 34, 1115-1137.
83. Rosansky, E. J. (1976). Methods and morphemes in second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 26, 409-425.
84. Salaberry, R., & Shirai, Y. (Eds.). (2002). The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
85. Schmitt, N., & Marsden, R. (2006). Why is English like that? Historical answers to hard ELT questions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
86. Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21-41.
87. Slobin, D. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219-227.
88. Slobin, D. (Ed.). (1985). The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (in press). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning.
90. Stockwell, R. P., Bowen, J. D., & Marten, J. W. (1965a) The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
91. Stockwell, R. P., Bowen, J. D., & Marten, J. W. (1965b). The grammatical structures of English and Italian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92. Swan, M. (2001). If this is the cure, let's have the disease. ELT Journal, 55, 178-183.
93. Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Segalowitz, N. (2007). A dynamic look at L2 phonological learning: Seeking psycholinguistic explanations for implicational phenomena. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 407-448.
94. Trubetzkoy, N. (1969). Principles of phonology (C. Baltaxe, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1939)
95. van Riemsdijk, H. C. (1978). A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Lisse, The Netherlands: Peter de Ridder.
96. Wei, L. (2000). Unequal election of morphemes in adult second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 21, 106-140.
97. White, J. (1998). Getting the learners' attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. White, J., Collins, L., Trofimovich, P., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. (2007). When positive evidence isn't evident: A multidimensional analysis of possessive determiners in classroom input. Paper presented at the Sixth international symposium on bilingualism, Hamburg, Germany.
99. White, J., Muñoz, C., & Collins, L. (2007). The his/her challenge: Making progress in a "regular" L2 programme. Language Awareness, 16, 243-299.
100. White, J., & Ranta, L. (2002). Examining the interface between metalinguistic task performance and oral production in second language classrooms. Language Awareness, 11, 259-290.
101. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
102. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
103. Winters, S. (2000). Turning phonology inside out, or testing the relative salience of audio and visual cues for place of articulation. In A. Miller-Ockhuizen, R. Levine, & A. J. Gonsalves (Eds.), Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 53, 168-199.
104. Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. Modern Language Journal, 93, 354-369.