The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of english

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 251-274

  Collins, Laura ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26244452531     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.61.2.251     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersen, R.W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In C.A. Ferguson & T. Huebner (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305-324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Andersen, R. (2002). The dimensions of pastness. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 79-105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Andersen, R.W., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133-156.
4. Andersen, R.W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527-570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994a). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994b). Reverse order reports and the acquisition of tense: Beyond the principle of chronological order. Language Learning, 44, 243-282.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1997). The acquisition of the present perfect: Another piece of the puzzle. Language Learning, 47, 797-806.
8. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471-508.
9. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341-382.
10. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002). Analyzing aspect. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 129-154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bergström, A. (1996). Acquisition of tense and aspect in second language and foreign language learning: Learner narratives in ESL and FFL. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 308-330.
13. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 107-131.
14. Borg, S. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9-38.
15. Collins, L. (1999). Marking time: The acquisition of tense and grammatical aspect by French-speaking learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal.
16. Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43-94.
17. Collins, L., & Segalowitz, N. (2004a). The learners' perspective on form and meaning. Unpublished manuscript.
18. Collins, L., & Segalowitz, N. (2004b). A psycholinguistic perspective on the aspect hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript.
19. Duff, P., & Li, D. (2002). The acquisition and use of perfective aspect in Mandarin. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 417-453). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 221-247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Housen, A. (1995). It's about time: The acquisition of temporality in English as a second language in a multilingual educational context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels.
22. Housen, A. (2002). The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 155-197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Kirk, R.E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
24. Kupferberg, I., & Olshtain, E. (1996). Explicit contrastive instruction facilitates the acquisition of difficult L2 forms. Language Awareness, 5, 149-165.
25. Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (2000). Do they know what they're doing? L2 learners' awareness of L1 influence. Language Awareness, 9(4), 198-217.
26. Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2000). The use of tense-aspect morphology in Spanish oral narratives: Exploring the perceptions of advanced learners. Hispania, 83, 830-844.
27. Robison, R. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlangauge. Applied Linguistics, 16, 344-370.
28. Rocca, S. (2002). Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: A bidirectional study. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 249-284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Rohde, A. (1996). The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 34, 1115-1137.
30. Rohde, A. (2002). The aspect hypothesis in naturalistic L2 acquisition: What uninflected and non-target-like verb forms in early interlanguage tell us. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 199-220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20, 151-178.
32. Salaberry, R., & Shirai, Y. (Eds.). (2002). The 12 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Shirai, Y. (2000). The semantics of the Japanese imperfective - teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 327-361.
34. Shirai, Y. (2002). The prototype hypothesis of tense-aspect acquisition in second language. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 455-478). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language Learning, 71, 743-762.
36. Shirai, Y., & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245-279.
37. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22.
38. Trévise, A. (1996). Contrastive metalinguistic representations: The case of 'very French' learners of English. Language Awareness, 5, 188-195.
39. Wode, H. (1978). Developmental sequences in naturalistic L2 acquisition. In E.M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 101-117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
40. (Reprinted from Working Papers on Bilingualism, 11, 1-31, 1976)
41. Wode, H. (1981). Language-acquisitional universals: A unified view of language acquisition. In W. Winitz (Ed.), Native-language and foreign language acquisition (vol. 379, pp. 218-234). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
42. Zobl, H. (1980a). Developmental and transfer errors: Their common bases and (possibly) differential effects on subsequent learning. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 469-479.
43. Zobl, H. (1980b). The formal and developmental selectivity of L1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 43-57.
44. Zobl, H. (1982). A direction for contrastive analysis: the comparative study of developmental sequences. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 169-183.