Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 433-459

  Murphy, Victoria A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46349106064     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263104263033     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of a cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Bates, E., Friederici, A., & Wulfeck, B. (1987). Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 19-67.
3. Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (1991). Connectionism and the mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Beck, M.-L. (1997). Regular verbs, past tense, and frequency: Tracking down a potential source of NS0NNS competence differences. Second Language Research, 13, 93-115.
5. Blackwell, A., & Bates, E. (1995). Inducing agrammatic profiles in normals: Evidence for the selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience , 7, 228-257.
6. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press.
7. Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
9. Bybee, J., & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270.
10. Bybee, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265-289.
11. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
12. Clahsen, H. (1995). German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dualmechanism model of inflection. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 123-137). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
13. Clark, A. (1989). Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge , MA: MIT Press.
14. Cowan, N. (1992). Verbal memory span and the timing of spoken recall. Journal of Memory and Language , 31, 668-684.
15. Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Cowan, N., Keller, T. A., Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., McDougall, S., & Rack, J. (1994). Verbal memory span in children: Speech timing clues to the mechanisms underlying age and word length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 234-250.
17. Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145-171.
20. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 307-336.
21. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. In S. Pinker & J. Mehler (Eds.), Connections and symbols (pp. 3-72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C. (2000). German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology, 41, 313-360.
25. Hare, M., Elman, J. L., & Daugherty, K. G. (1995). Default generalisation in connectionist networks. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 601-630.
26. Lardiere, D. (1995). L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by levelordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 11, 20-56.
27. Lee, B. P. H. (1994). Generalisation of regular and irregular inflectional patterns: Towards a language processing model for both native and non-native speakers of English. Cambridge University Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics, 1, 15-33.
28. MacWhinney, B. (1993). Connections and symbols: Closing the gap. Cognition, 49, 291-296.
29. MacWhinney, B. (1994). The dinosaurs and the ring. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 283-320). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
31. Murphy, V. A. (2000). Compounding and the representation of L2 morphology. Language Learning, 50, 153-197.
32. Nakisa, R. C., & Hahn, U. (1996). Where defaults don t help: The case of the German plural system. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 177-182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson
34. Pinker, S., & Mehler, J. (Eds.). (1988). Connections and symbols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
36. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1994). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 321-351). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
37. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron : Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43-102.
38. Plunkett, K., & Nakisa, R. C. (1997). A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 807-836.
39. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
40. Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 45-94.
41. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 45-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165-209). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17-26.
45. Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 15, 131-156.
46. Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative0procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105-122.