-
1
-
-
0037436563
-
-
(a) Schoemaker, H. E.; Mink, D.; Wubbolts, M. G. Science 2003, 299, 1694.
-
(2003)
Science
, vol.299
, pp. 1694
-
-
Schoemaker, H.E.1
Mink, D.2
Wubbolts, M.G.3
-
6
-
-
0035843136
-
-
Arnold, F. H. Nature 2001, 409, 253.
-
(2001)
Nature
, vol.409
, pp. 253
-
-
Arnold, F.H.1
-
10
-
-
34047138077
-
-
(b) Chaparro-Riggers, J. F.; Polizzi, K. M.; Bommarius, A. S. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2, 180.
-
(2007)
Biotechnol. J
, vol.2
, pp. 180
-
-
Chaparro-Riggers, J.F.1
Polizzi, K.M.2
Bommarius, A.S.3
-
11
-
-
33947095042
-
-
(c) Fox, R. J.; Davis, S. C.; Mundorff, E. C.; Newman, L. M.; Gavrilovic, V.; Ma, S. K.; Chung, L. M.; Ching, C.; Tam, S.; Muley, S.; Grate, J.; Gruber, J.; Whitman, J. C.; Sheldon, R. A.; Huisman, G. W. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 338.
-
(2007)
Nat. Biotechnol
, vol.25
, pp. 338
-
-
Fox, R.J.1
Davis, S.C.2
Mundorff, E.C.3
Newman, L.M.4
Gavrilovic, V.5
Ma, S.K.6
Chung, L.M.7
Ching, C.8
Tam, S.9
Muley, S.10
Grate, J.11
Gruber, J.12
Whitman, J.C.13
Sheldon, R.A.14
Huisman, G.W.15
-
12
-
-
0035496145
-
-
(a) Rotticci, D.; Rotticci-Mulder, J. C.; Denman, S.; Norin, T.; Hult, K. ChemBioChem. 2001, 2, 766.
-
(2001)
ChemBioChem
, vol.2
, pp. 766
-
-
Rotticci, D.1
Rotticci-Mulder, J.C.2
Denman, S.3
Norin, T.4
Hult, K.5
-
13
-
-
12344337569
-
-
(b) Park, S.; Morley, K. L.; Horsman, G. P.; Holmquist, M.; Hult, K.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 45.
-
(2005)
Chem. Biol
, vol.12
, pp. 45
-
-
Park, S.1
Morley, K.L.2
Horsman, G.P.3
Holmquist, M.4
Hult, K.5
Kazlauskas, R.J.6
-
14
-
-
14644445167
-
-
(c) Ijima, Y.; Matoishi, K.; Terao, Y.; Doi, N.; Yanagawa, H.; Ohta, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 877.
-
(2005)
Chem. Commun
, pp. 877
-
-
Ijima, Y.1
Matoishi, K.2
Terao, Y.3
Doi, N.4
Yanagawa, H.5
Ohta, H.6
-
15
-
-
26944481501
-
-
(d) Ema, T.; Fujii, T.; Ozaki, M.; Korenaga, T.; Sakai, T. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4650.
-
(2005)
Chem. Commun
, pp. 4650
-
-
Ema, T.1
Fujii, T.2
Ozaki, M.3
Korenaga, T.4
Sakai, T.5
-
16
-
-
33846302851
-
-
(e) Reetz, M. T.; Puls, M.; Carballeira, J. D.; Vogel, A.; Jaeger, K. E.; Eggert, T.; Thiel, W.; Bocola, M.; Otte, N. ChemBioChem. 2007, 8, 106.
-
(2007)
ChemBioChem
, vol.8
, pp. 106
-
-
Reetz, M.T.1
Puls, M.2
Carballeira, J.D.3
Vogel, A.4
Jaeger, K.E.5
Eggert, T.6
Thiel, W.7
Bocola, M.8
Otte, N.9
-
17
-
-
38349149323
-
-
(a) Ling, K.; Li, W.; Sayre, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 933.
-
(2008)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.130
, pp. 933
-
-
Ling, K.1
Li, W.2
Sayre, L.M.3
-
19
-
-
1542440411
-
-
(a) Azevedo, A. M.; Martins, V. C.; Prazers, D. M.; Vojinovic, V.; Cabral, J. M.; Fonseca, L. P. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2003, 9, 199.
-
(2003)
Biotechnol. Annu. Rev
, vol.9
, pp. 199
-
-
Azevedo, A.M.1
Martins, V.C.2
Prazers, D.M.3
Vojinovic, V.4
Cabral, J.M.5
Fonseca, L.P.6
-
20
-
-
0030750870
-
-
(b) van Deurzen, M. P. J.; van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13183.
-
(1997)
Tetrahedron
, vol.53
, pp. 13183
-
-
van Deurzen, M.P.J.1
van Rantwijk, F.2
Sheldon, R.A.3
-
21
-
-
12144261194
-
-
Gilabert, M. A.; Fenoll, L. G.; Garcia-Molina, F.; Garcia-Ruiz, P. A.; Tudela, J.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J. N. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 385, 1177.
-
(2004)
J. Biol. Chem
, vol.385
, pp. 1177
-
-
Gilabert, M.A.1
Fenoll, L.G.2
Garcia-Molina, F.3
Garcia-Ruiz, P.A.4
Tudela, J.5
Garcia-Canovas, F.6
Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N.7
-
22
-
-
56649111369
-
-
Antipov, E.; Cho, A. E.; Wittrup, K. D.; Klibanov, A. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 17694.
-
(2008)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
, vol.105
, pp. 17694
-
-
Antipov, E.1
Cho, A.E.2
Wittrup, K.D.3
Klibanov, A.M.4
-
24
-
-
33745932472
-
-
(b) Ryan, B. J.; Carolan, N.; O'Fagain, C. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 355.
-
(2006)
Trends Biotechnol
, vol.24
, pp. 355
-
-
Ryan, B.J.1
Carolan, N.2
O'Fagain, C.3
-
26
-
-
35349015204
-
-
Lipovšek, D.; Antipov, E.; Armstrong, K. A.; Olsen, M. J.; Klibanov, A. M.; Tidor, B.; Wittrup, K. D. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14, 1176.
-
(2007)
Chem. Biol
, vol.14
, pp. 1176
-
-
Lipovšek, D.1
Antipov, E.2
Armstrong, K.A.3
Olsen, M.J.4
Klibanov, A.M.5
Tidor, B.6
Wittrup, K.D.7
-
27
-
-
68249136228
-
-
Oxidation of fluorescent phenolic substrates by surface-bound HRP produces phenolic radicals that are captured by the cell surface, thereby fluorescently labeling the yeast cells. Fluorescence intensity of these cells, measured by flow cytometry, is directly proportional to the catalytic activity of the enzyme. An epitope tag fused to HRP allows quantitative determination of the enzyme concentration using fluorescently labeled antibodies
-
Oxidation of fluorescent phenolic substrates by surface-bound HRP produces phenolic radicals that are captured by the cell surface, thereby fluorescently labeling the yeast cells. Fluorescence intensity of these cells, measured by flow cytometry, is directly proportional to the catalytic activity of the enzyme. An epitope tag fused to HRP allows quantitative determination of the enzyme concentration using fluorescently labeled antibodies.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
68249143832
-
-
Defined as the ratio of the initial rate of the enzymatic oxidation of the (S)-enantiomer divided by that of the (R)-enantiomer.
-
Defined as the ratio of the initial rate of the enzymatic oxidation of the (S)-enantiomer divided by that of the (R)-enantiomer.
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
68249156088
-
-
This supposition is supported by computational docking of these HRP variants with 1 which indicates that the substitution of Arg178 with bulky aromatic residues makes the active site inaccessible to 1 data not shown, We are unable to measure catalytic activity of these variants using smaller phenols, as our methodology does not allow characterization of the surface-bound enzyme using non-fluorescent substrates
-
This supposition is supported by computational docking of these HRP variants with 1 which indicates that the substitution of Arg178 with bulky aromatic residues makes the active site inaccessible to 1 (data not shown). We are unable to measure catalytic activity of these variants using smaller phenols, as our methodology does not allow characterization of the surface-bound enzyme using non-fluorescent substrates.
-
-
-
-
30
-
-
0030734513
-
-
The increased enantioselectivity of HRP variants with amino acids substitutions that remove the positive charge at position 178 may be explained by the presence of a putative cation-π interaction between Arg178 (or Lys178) and Phe179. Elimination of this interaction shifts the position of Phe179, a residue shown to be critical in substrate binding: Veitch, N. C, Gao, Y, Smith, A. T, White, C. G. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 14751sthereby sterically hindering binding of 1 and, in turn, influencing the enantioselectivity of these variants
-
The increased enantioselectivity of HRP variants with amino acids substitutions that remove the positive charge at position 178 may be explained by the presence of a putative cation-π interaction between Arg178 (or Lys178) and Phe179. Elimination of this interaction shifts the position of Phe179 - a residue shown to be critical in substrate binding: Veitch, N. C.; Gao, Y.; Smith, A. T.; White, C. G. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 14751sthereby sterically hindering binding of 1 and, in turn, influencing the enantioselectivity of these variants.
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
68249150149
-
-
It is also possible, however, that the sulfonates are not involved because they form intramolecular salt bridges with the neighboring protonated amino groups
-
It is also possible, however, that the sulfonates are not involved because they form intramolecular salt bridges with the neighboring protonated amino groups.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
0029016182
-
-
Altering the strength of electrostatic interactions by varying salt concentration in solution is commonly used in enzyme studies, e.g. Honig, B, Nicholls, A. Science 1995, 268, 1144
-
Altering the strength of electrostatic interactions by varying salt concentration in solution is commonly used in enzyme studies, e.g. Honig, B.; Nicholls, A. Science 1995, 268, 1144.
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
34247853302
-
-
In contrast to such conventional electrostatic interactions as salt bridges, cation-π interactions have been shown to be essentially insensitive to salt concentration in solution: Berry, B. W.; Elvekrog, M. M.; Tommos, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5308.
-
In contrast to such conventional electrostatic interactions as salt bridges, cation-π interactions have been shown to be essentially insensitive to salt concentration in solution: Berry, B. W.; Elvekrog, M. M.; Tommos, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5308.
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
68249151615
-
-
It should be noted that the enantioselectivity of the Arg178Glu enzyme toward 3 differs from that of the wild-type enzyme (2.4 ( 0.1 Vs 1.1 ( 0.1, respectively) caused by a surprising doubling in the oxidation rate of the (S)-enantiomer (Table 1).
-
It should be noted that the enantioselectivity of the Arg178Glu enzyme toward 3 differs from that of the wild-type enzyme (2.4 ( 0.1 Vs 1.1 ( 0.1, respectively) caused by a surprising doubling in the oxidation rate of the (S)-enantiomer (Table 1).
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
0037419268
-
-
Takakusa, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Kojima, H.; Nagano, T. Chem. - Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1479.
-
(2003)
Chem. - Eur. J
, vol.9
, pp. 1479
-
-
Takakusa, H.1
Kikuchi, K.2
Urano, Y.3
Kojima, H.4
Nagano, T.5
-
36
-
-
68249148639
-
-
m regime is at play.
-
m regime is at play.
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
0033521007
-
-
Henriksen, A.; Smith, A. T.; Gajhede, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 35005.
-
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem
, vol.274
, pp. 35005
-
-
Henriksen, A.1
Smith, A.T.2
Gajhede, M.3
-
40
-
-
33645324289
-
-
Rassolov, V. A.; Pople, J. A.; Ratner, M. A.; Windus, T. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 1123.
-
(1998)
J. Chem. Phys
, vol.109
, pp. 1123
-
-
Rassolov, V.A.1
Pople, J.A.2
Ratner, M.A.3
Windus, T.L.4
-
42
-
-
0036606483
-
-
Halperin, I.; Ma, B.; Wolfson, H.; Nussinov, R. Proteins 2002, 47, 409.
-
(2002)
Proteins
, vol.47
, pp. 409
-
-
Halperin, I.1
Ma, B.2
Wolfson, H.3
Nussinov, R.4
|