Molecular mechanisms underlying neural circuit formation

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 162-167

  Lu, Bai ^a   Wang, Kuan Hong ^b   Nose, Akinao ^c  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR; CALCIUM ION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

BRAIN CORTEX; FILOPODIUM; GABAERGIC SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NERVE FIBER GROWTH; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PRESYNAPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; SYNAPSE; SYNAPTIC INHIBITION; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; SYNAPTOGENESIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; GLUTAMIC ACID; NEURONS; SYNAPSES;

EID: 67650744481     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. •].
2. 2+ signaling for partner selection.
3. Sudhof T.C. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 455 (2008) 903-911
4. Song J.Y., Ichtchenko K., Sudhof T.C., and Brose N. Neuroligin 1 is a postsynaptic cell-adhesion molecule of excitatory synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96 (1999) 1100-1105
5. Varoqueaux F., Jamain S., and Brose N. Neuroligin 2 is exclusively localized to inhibitory synapses. Eur J Cell Biol 83 (2004) 449-456
6. Chubykin A.A., Atasoy D., Etherton M.R., Brose N., Kavalali E.T., Gibson J.R., and Sudhof T.C. Activity-dependent validation of excitatory versus inhibitory synapses by neuroligin-1 versus neuroligin-2. Neuron 54 (2007) 919-931. This study provides in vivo evidence for the role of neuroligin-1 and neuroligin-2 in excitatory versus inhibitory synaptic function. Furthermore, activity dependence of the function of neuroligin-1 and neuroligin-2 is shown.
7. Tabuchi K., Blundell J., Etherton M.R., Hammer R.E., Liu X., Powell C.M., and Sudhof T.C. A neuroligin-3 mutation implicated in autism increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in mice. Science 318 (2007) 71-76. This work shows that a specific mutation of neuroligin-3, which is found in patients of autism spectrum disorders, but not deletion of the gene, increases inhibitory synaptic transmission in vivo.
8. Klein R. Bidirectional modulation of synaptic functions by Eph/ephrin signaling. Nat Neurosci 12 (2009) 15-20
9. Lim B.K., Matsuda N., and Poo M.M. Ephrin-B reverse signaling promotes structural and functional synaptic maturation in vivo. Nat Neurosci 11 (2008) 160-169. Activation of presynaptic Ephrin-B signaling by perfusion with EphB2-Fc increases the number of retinotectal synapses in Xenopus. It also enhances synaptic function and plasticity.
10. Aoto J., Ting P., Maghsoodi B., Xu N., Henkemeyer M., and Chen L. Postsynaptic ephrinB3 promotes shaft glutamatergic synapse formation. J Neurosci 27 (2007) 7508-7519
11. Segura I., Essmann C.L., Weinges S., and Acker-Palmer A. Grb4 and GIT1 transduce ephrinB reverse signals modulating spine morphogenesis and synapse formation. Nat Neurosci 10 (2007) 301-310
12. Shen K. Molecular mechanisms of target specificity during synapse formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14 (2004) 83-88
13. Shinza-Kameda M., Takasu E., Sakurai K., Hayashi S., and Nose A. Regulation of layer-specific targeting by reciprocal expression of a cell adhesion molecule, capricious. Neuron 49 (2006) 205-213
14. Yamagata M., and Sanes J.R. Dscam and Sidekick proteins direct lamina-specific synaptic connections in vertebrate retina. Nature 451 (2008) 465-469. The authors used loss-of-function and gain-of-function analyses to demonstrate that Dscams and Sidekicks, four closely related immunoglobulin superfamily CAMs, mediate lamina-specific synaptic targeting in chick retina. These molecules are the first examples of vertebrate target recognition molecules whose function is rigorously demonstrated by in vivo analyses.
15. Ango F., Wu C., Van der Want J.J., Wu P., Schachner M., and Huang Z.J. Bergmann glia and the recognition molecule CHL1 organize GABAergic axons and direct innervation of Purkinje cell dendrites. PLoS Biol 6 (2008) e103. During the targeting of stellate axons to Purkinje cells, CHL1 directs the axons to specific dendritic regions in the target cell. Interestingly, CHL1 is not expressed in the target cell itself but in neighboring Bargmann glia that function as guidepost cells. Determination of target specificity by a signal from nearby guidepost cells is also reported in C. elegans [22].
16. Inaki M., Yoshikawa S., Thomas J.B., Aburatani H., and Nose A. Wnt4 is a local repulsive cue that determines synaptic target specificity. Curr Biol 17 (2007) 1574-1579. During the targeting of two neighboring muscles M12 and M13 in Drosophila, Wnt4 is preferentially expressed in M13. In the absence of Wnt4, motor neurons targeted to M12 form smaller endings on the target cell and instead arborize ectopically on M13, suggesting that Wnt4 determines target specificity by preventing synapse formation on the nontarget cell. Frizzled 2 and Derailed-2/Ryk are implicated as receptors that receive Wnt4 signaling in motor neurons.
17. Klassen M.P., and Shen K. Wnt signaling positions neuromuscular connectivity by inhibiting synapse formation in C. elegans. Cell 130 (2007) 704-716. This study in C. elegans demonstrates that Lin-44/Wnt (secreted by the hypodermal cells in the tail) inhibits synapse formation in a subdomain of the DA9 motor axon by localizing Wnt receptor Lin-17/Frizzled (Fz) in this domain. Lin-44/Wnt inhibition is necessary and sufficient for specific localization of presynaptic components along the DA9 axon, indicating its role in spatial regulation of synapses.
18. Poon V.Y., Klassen M.P., and Shen K. UNC-6/netrin and its receptor UNC-5 locally exclude presynaptic components from dendrites. Nature 455 (2008) 669-673. The authors show that, like Lin-44/Wnt, Unc-6/Netrin determines the patterning of presynaptic components along the DA9 axon by local inhibition. The antisynaptogenic effect of Unc-6/Netrin is mediated by Unc5 receptor expressed in DA9 neurons. Interestingly, Unc-6/Netrin was recently shown to promote presynaptic differentiation through another receptor, Unc-40/DCC, in different neurons [22]. Thus, Unc-6/Netrin may exert synaptogenic and antisynaptogenic effects depending on the receptors in the recipient cells.
19. Campbell D.S., Stringham S.A., Timm A., Xiao T., Law M.Y., Baier H., Nonet M.L., and Chien C.B. Slit1a inhibits retinal ganglion cell arborization and synaptogenesis via Robo2-dependent and -independent pathways. Neuron 55 (2007) 231-245
20. Di Cristo G., Chattopadhyaya B., Kuhlman S.J., Fu Y., Belanger M.C., Wu C.Z., Rutishauser U., Maffei L., and Huang Z.J. Activity-dependent PSA expression regulates inhibitory maturation and onset of critical period plasticity. Nat Neurosci 10 (2007) 1569-1577. The authors find in the mouse visual cortex that concentration of PSA is downregulated shortly after eye opening in an activity-dependent manner. The effects of premature enzymatic removal of PSA suggest that the downregulation of PSA regulates timing of the maturation of inhibitory synapses and the onset of ocular dominance plasticity.
21. McAllister A.K. Dynamic aspects of CNS synapse formation. Annu Rev Neurosci 30 (2007) 425-450
22. Colon-Ramos D.A., Margeta M.A., and Shen K. Glia promote local synaptogenesis through UNC-6 (netrin) signaling in C. elegans. Science 318 (2007) 103-106
23. Flavell S.W., and Greenberg M.E. Signaling mechanisms linking neuronal activity to gene expression and plasticity of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci 31 (2008) 563-590
24. Chao H.T., Zoghbi H.Y., and Rosenmund C. MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron 56 (2007) 58-65. The authors examined the synaptic properties of individual neurons from mice that either lack or double the expression of MeCP2, and found that MeCP2 is a key-rate limiting factor for glutamatergic synapse formation.
25. Dani V.S., Chang Q., Maffei A., Turrigiano G.G., Jaenisch R., and Nelson S.B. Reduced cortical activity due to a shift in the balance between excitation and inhibition in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 12560-12565
26. •].
27. •], methylated DNA binding protein MeCP2 was shown regulated by neural activity. This regulation is mediated by a calcium dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2.
28. •].
29. •], MEF2 transcription factors were shown activated by neural activity and act to suppress excitatory synapses in vitro and in vivo, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism to achieve E/I balance.
30. Lin Y., Bloodgood B.L., Hauser J.L., Lapan A.D., Koon A.C., Kim T.K., Hu L.S., Malik A.N., and Greenberg M.E. Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4. Nature 455 (2008) 1198-1204. Through a microarray-based screen of membrane depolarization regulated genes, the authors identified a transcription factor that specifically regulates the formation of inhibitory synapses.
31. Sugiyama S., Di Nardo A.A., Aizawa S., Matsuo I., Volovitch M., Prochiantz A., and Hensch T.K. Experience-dependent transfer of Otx2 homeoprotein into the visual cortex activates postnatal plasticity. Cell 134 (2008) 508-520. The authors demonstrate a role for Otx2 homeoprotein to regulate the maturation of inhibitory neurons in visual cortex. Surprisingly, Otx2 is not made in the inhibitory neurons, but transferred into those cells from subcortical visual pathways in an experience-dependent manner.
32. Chowdhury S., Shepherd J.D., Okuno H., Lyford G., Petralia R.S., Plath N., Kuhl D., Huganir R.L., and Worley P.F. Arc/Arg3.1 interacts with the endocytic machinery to regulate AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron 52 (2006) 445-459
33. Wang K.H., Majewska A., Schummers J., Farley B., Hu C., Sur M., and Tonegawa S. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals a role of arc in enhancing orientation specificity in visual cortex. Cell 126 (2006) 389-402
34. Goddard C.A., Butts D.A., and Shatz C.J. Regulation of CNS synapses by neuronal MHC class I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 6828-6833
35. Sala C., Futai K., Yamamoto K., Worley P.F., Hayashi Y., and Sheng M. Inhibition of dendritic spine morphogenesis and synaptic transmission by activity-inducible protein Homer1a. J Neurosci 23 (2003) 6327-6337
36. Nedivi E., Wu G.Y., and Cline H.T. Promotion of dendritic growth by CPG15, an activity-induced signaling molecule. Science 281 (1998) 1863-1866
37. ••].
38. ••] this study used slightly different knockin techniques to disrupt the promoter-IV-driven BDNF transcription in mice. Both show that activity-dependent BDNF transcription through promoter IV is important for the development and function of GABAergic synapses in the cortex.