Exploring the linkages between formal ownership and psychological ownership for the organization: The mediating role of organizational justice

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 691-711

  Chi, Nai Wen ^a   Han, Tzu Shian ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650317452     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317907X262314     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Adams J. S. Inequity in social exchange. Berkowitz L Advances in experimental social psychology 2:267-299. New York: Academic Press; 1965
2. Alexander S, Ruderman M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organization behavior. Social Justice Research 1:177-198. 1987.
3. Ambrose M. L, Arnaud A. Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct?. Greenberg J Colquitt J. A Handbook of organizational justice:59-84. Mahwah, NJ: LEA; 2005.
4. Anderson J. C, Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103:411-423. 1998.
5. Aryee S, Budhwar P. S, Chen Z. X. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23:267-285. 2002.
6. Aryee S, Chen Z. X, Budhwar P. S. Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 94:1-14. 2004.
7. Baron R. M, Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1173-1182. 1986.
8. Ben-Ner A, Han T. S, Jones D. C. The productivity effects of employee participation in control and in economic returns: A review of empirical evidence. Pagano U Rowthorn R Democracy and efficiency in economic enterprise:209-244.London: Routledge; 1996.
9. Blau P. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley; 1964.
10. Bollen K. A. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
11. Brett J. M, Goldberg S. B. Mediator-advisors: A new third-party role. Bazeman M Lewicki R Negotiating in organizations:165-176.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1983.
12. Chen Z. X, Aryee S. Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Management Journal 50:226-238. 2007.
13. Chiu S. F, Tsai W. C. The linkage between profit sharing and organizational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management 18:1098-1115. 2007.
14. Cin B. C, Han T. S, Smith S. C. A tale of two tigers: Employee financial participation in Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Human Resource Management 14:920-941. 2003.
15. Cole N. D, Flint D. H. Perceptions of distributive and procedural justice in employee benefits: Flexible versus traditional benefit plans. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19:19-40. 2004.
16. Colquitt J. A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:386-400. 2001.
17. Colquitt J. A, Conlon D. E, Wesson M. J, Porter C. O, Ng K. Y. Justice at millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86:425-445. 2001.
18. Cortina J. M. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78:98-104. 1993.
19. Cox A. The importance of employee participation in determining pay system effectiveness. International Journal of Management Reviews 2:357-375. 2000.
20. Coyle-Shapiro J. A, Morrow P. C, Richardson R, Dunn S. R. Using profit sharing to enhance employee attitudes: A longitudinal examination of the effects on trust and commitment. Human Resource Management 41:423-439. 2002.
21. Cronpanzano R, Ambrose M. L. Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. Greenberg J Cropanzano R Advances in organizational justice:119-151. Lexington, MA: New Lexington Press; 2001.
22. Csikszentmihalyi M, Rochberg-Halton E. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
23. Dittmar H. The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1992.
24. Feather N. T. Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3:86-107. 1999.
25. Ferrante C, Rousseau D. M. Bringing open book management into the academic line of sight: Sharing the firm's financial information with workers. Cooper C. I Rousseau D. MTrends in organizational behavior 8:97-116.Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2001;.
26. Folger R, Cropanzano R. Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
27. Furby L. Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality 6:49-65. 1978.
28. Han T. S, Shen C. H. The effects of bonus systems on firm performance in Taiwan's high-tech sector. Journal of Comparative Economics 35:235-249. 2007.
29. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
30. Industrial Democracy in Europe (IDE). Industrial democracy in Europe: An international comparative study. Social Science Information 15:173-203. 1976.
31. Industrial Democracy in Europe (IDE). Industrial democracy in Europe revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
32. Jöreskog K. G, Sörbom D. LISREL: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999.
33. Kaarsemaker E. C, Poutsma E. The fit of employee ownership with other human resource management practices: Theoretical and empirical suggestions regarding the existence of an ownership high-performance work system. Economic and Industrial Democracy 27:669-685. 2006.
34. Korsgaard M. A, Roberson L. Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management 21:657-669. 1995.
35. Korsgaard M. A, Schweiger D. M, Sapienza H. J. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 38:60-84. 1995.
36. Kristof-Brown A, Barrick M. R, Franke M. Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. Journal of Management 28:27-46. 2002.
37. Lam S. S. K, Schaubroeck J, Aryee S. Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23:1-18. 2002.
38. Law K. S, Wong C. S, Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review 23:741-755. 1998.
39. Lawler E. E, Mohrman S. A, Ledford G. E. Employee involvement and total quality management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1992.
40. Ledford G, Lucy M. The reward of work: The employment deal in a changing economy. New York: Sibson Consulting; 2003.
41. Lee T. W, Maurer S. D. The retention of knowledge workers with the unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Human Resource Management Review 7:247-275. 1997.
42. Lind E. A, Kanfer R, Earley R. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:952-959. 1990.
43. Lind E. A, Tyler T. R. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum; 1988.
44. Locke E. A, Schweiger D. M. Participation in decision-making: One more look. Research in Organizational Behavior 1:265-339. 1979.
45. Loi R, Ngo H, Foley S. Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 79:101-120. 2006.
46. Milkovich G. T. Compensation systems in high tech companies. Anderson C. S Kleingartner A Human resource management in high technology firms:103-114. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1987.
47. Moorman R. H. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology 76:845-855. 1991.
48. Nunnally J. C, Bernstein I. H. Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). 3rd ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
49. O'Driscoll M. P, Pierce J. L, Coghlan A. The psychological ownership: Work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior. Group and Organization Management 31:388-416. 2006.
50. Olkkonen M, Lipponen J. Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100:202-215. 2006.
51. Pare G, Tremblay M. The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group and Organization Management 32:326-357. 2007.
52. Pendleton A, Wilson N, Wright M. The perception and effects of share ownership: Empirical evidence from employee buy-outs. British Journal of Industrial Relations 36:99-123. 1998.
53. Pierce J. L, Kostova T, Dirks K. T. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review 26:298-310. 2001.
54. Pierce J. L, Kostova T, Dirks K. T. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology 7:84-107. 2003.
55. Pierce J. L, O'Driscoll M. P, Coghlan A. Work environments structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. Journal of Social Psychology 144:507-534. 2004.
56. Pierce J. L, Rodgers L. The psychological of ownership and worker-owner productivity. Group and Organizational Management 29:588-613. 2004.
57. Pierce J. L, Rubenfeld S. A, Morgan S. Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review 16:121-144. 1991.
58. Podsakoff P. M, MacKenzie S. B, Lee J, Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88:879-903. 2003.
59. Podsakoff P. M, Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12:531-544. 1986.
60. Preacher K. J, Hayes A. F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36:717-731. 2004.
61. Price K. H, Lavelle J. L, Henley A. B, Cocchiara F. K, Buchanan F. R. Judging the fairness of voice-based participation across multiple and interrelated stages of decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99:212-226. 2006.
62. Rhodes S. R, Steers R. M. Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations 34:1013-1035. 1981.
63. Robbins T. L, Summers T. P, Miller J. L, Hendrix W. H. Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73:511-518. 2000.
64. Roberson Q. M, Moye N. A, Locke E. A. Identifying a missing link between participation and satisfaction: The mediating role of procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 84:585-593. 1999.
65. Roch S. G, Shanock L. R. Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management 32:299-322. 2006.
66. Rousseau D. M, Shperling Z. Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relationship. Academy of Management Review 28:553-570. 2003.
67. Rudmin F. W, Berry J. W. Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. Psychologcial Record 37:257-268. 1987.
68. Sapienza H. J, Korsgaard M. A. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal 39:544-574. 1996.
69. Schwab D. P. Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). 2nd ed.. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005.
70. Shaffer B. S, Riordan C. M. A review of cross-cultural methodologies for organizational research: A best-practices approach. Organizational Research Methods 6:169-215. 2003.
71. Sobel M. E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Leinhardt SSociological methodology:290-312.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1982.
72. Spector E. P, Fox S. Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: Development of the Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS). Journal of Organizational Behavior 24:417-432. 2003.
73. Thibaut J, Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1975.
74. Tyler T. R, Blader S. L. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7:349-361. 2003.
75. Vandewalle D, Van Dyne L, Kostova T. Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group and Organization Management 20:210-226. 1995.
76. Van Dyne L, Pierce J. L. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25:439-459. 2004.
77. VanYperen N. W. Informational support, equity and burnout: The moderating effect of self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 71:29-33. 1998.
78. Viswesvaran C, Ones D. S. Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 38:193-203. 2002.
79. Wagner S. H, Parker C. P, Christiansen N. D. Employees that think and act like owners: The effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology 56:847-871. 2003.
80. Welbourne T. M, Balkin D. B, Gomez-Mejia L. R. Gainsharing and mutual monitoring: A combined agency-organizational justice interpretation. Academy of Management Journal 38:881-899. 1995.
81. Whetten D. A. What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review 14:490-495. 1989.
82. Witt L. A, Kacmar K. M, Andrews M. C. The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor-rated commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22:505-515. 2001.