Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 511-518

  Robbins, Tina L ^a   Summers, Timothy P ^a   Miller, Janis L ^a   Hendrix, William H ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034354309     PISSN: 09631798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/096317900167191     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
2. Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 161-182.
3. DeCotiis, T. A., & Summers, T. P. (1987). A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 7, 445-470.
4. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 12, 115-130.
5. Goodman, P. S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 170-195.
6. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
7. Greenberg, J. (1996). The distributive justice of performance evaluations. In The quest for justice on the job (pp. 163-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Hendrix, W. H. (1984). Development of a contingency model organizational assessment survey for management consultants. Journal of Experimental Education, 52(2), 95-105.
9. Hendrix, W. H., & McNichols, C. W. (1984). Organizational effectiveness as a function of managerial style, situational environment, and effectiveness criterion. Journal of Experimental Education, 52(3), 145-151.
10. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London and New York: Routledge.
11. Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
12. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal decisions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
13. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
14. Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organization Management, 21, 84-104.
15. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationships between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.
16. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
17. Shapiro, D. L. (1993). Reconciling theoretical differences among procedural justice by reevaluating what it means to have one's views 'considered': Implications for third-party managers. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Summers, T. P., & DeNisi, A. S. (1990). In search of Adams' other: Reexamination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Human Relations, 43, 497-511.
19. Summers, T. P., & Hendrix, W. H. (1991). Modeling the role of pay equity perceptions: A field study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 145-157.
20. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the 'ends' and the 'means': An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40.
21. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1997). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
23. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Beyond formal procedures. The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Advances in applied social psychology: business settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
25. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.