Regulation of Notch signaling during T- and B-cell development by O-fucose glycans

Immunological Reviews

Volumn 230, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 201-215

  Stanley, Pamela ^a   Guidos, Cynthia J ^b,c  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

B cell; Fringe; Notch signaling; O fucose; T cell

Indexed keywords

BETA 1,3 N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINYL TRANSFERASE; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR; FUCOSYLTRANSFERASE; GLYCAN; N ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE; NOTCH RECEPTOR; NOTCH1 RECEPTOR; NOTCH2 RECEPTOR; PROTEIN; PROTEIN DLL; PROTEIN FRINGE; PROTEIN JAGGED; PROTEIN LFNG; PROTEIN LUNATIC; PROTEIN MANIC; PROTEIN MFNG; PROTEIN O FUCOSYLTRANSFERASE 1; PROTEIN POFUT 1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

B LYMPHOCYTE; BINDING SITE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; EPITHELIUM CELL; FUCOSYLATION; LIGAND BINDING; LYMPHOPOIESIS; MYELOPOIESIS; NONHUMAN; PRE B LYMPHOCYTE; PRE T LYMPHOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPLEEN; T LYMPHOCYTE; THYMUS;

ANIMALS; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; FUCOSE; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; POLYSACCHARIDES; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T-LYMPHOCYTES; TRANSFERASES;

EID: 67649794877     PISSN: 01052896     EISSN: 1600065X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00791.x     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Maillard I, Fang T, Pear WS. Regulation of lymphoid development, differentiation, and function by the Notch pathway. Annu Rev Immunol 2005 23 : 945 974. (Pubitemid 40563190)
2. Tanigaki K, Honjo T. Regulation of lymphocyte development by Notch signaling. Nat Immunol 2007 8 : 451 456. (Pubitemid 46605909)
3. D'Souza B, Miyamoto A, Weinmaster G. The many facets of Notch ligands. Oncogene 2008 27 : 5148 5167.
4. Gordon WR, Vardar-Ulu D, Histen G, Sanchez-Irizarry C, Aster JC, Blacklow SC. Structural basis for autoinhibition of Notch. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007 14 : 295 300. (Pubitemid 46608349)
5. Ilagan MX, Kopan R. SnapShot: notch signaling pathway. Cell 2007 128 : 1246.
6. Krejci A, Bernard F, Housden BE, Collins S, Bray SJ. Direct response to Notch activation: signaling crosstalk and incoherent logic. Sci Signal 2009 2 : ra1. Erratum in: Sci Signal. 2009;2:er3.
7. Harper JA, Yuan JS, Tan JB, Visan I, Guidos CJ. Notch signaling in development and disease. Clin Genet 2003 64 : 461 472. (Pubitemid 37493116)
8. Visan I, Yuan JS, Tan JB, Cretegny K, Guidos CJ. Regulation of intrathymic T-cell development by Lunatic Fringe-Notch1 interactions. Immunol Rev 2006 209 : 76 94.
9. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 1999 284 : 770 776. (Pubitemid 29291335)
10. Haines N, Irvine KD. Glycosylation regulates Notch signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003 4 : 786 797. (Pubitemid 37229375)
11. Rampal R, Luther KB, Haltiwanger RS. Notch signaling in normal and disease States: possible therapies related to glycosylation. Curr Mol Med 2007 7 : 427 445. (Pubitemid 46979706)
12. Kumano K, et al. Notch1 but not Notch2 is essential for generating hematopoietic stem cells from endothelial cells. Immunity 2003 18 : 699 711. (Pubitemid 36588586)
13. Maillard I, et al. Canonical notch signaling is dispensable for the maintenance of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008 2 : 356 366.
14. Bhandoola A, Sambandam A. From stem cell to T cell: one route or many? Nat Rev Immunol 2006 6 : 117 126. (Pubitemid 43361587)
15. Schwarz BA, Sambandam A, Maillard I, Harman BC, Love PE, Bhandoola A. Selective thymus settling regulated by cytokine and chemokine receptors. J Immunol 2007 178 : 2008 2017. (Pubitemid 46233397)
16. Koch U, et al. Subversion of the T/B lineage decision in the thymus by lunatic fringe-mediated inhibition of Notch-1. Immunity 2001 15 : 225 236. (Pubitemid 32816872)
17. Feyerabend TB, et al. Deletion of Notch1 converts pro-T cells to dendritic cells and promotes thymic B cells by cell-extrinsic and cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Immunity 2009 30 : 67 79.
18. Balciunaite G, Ceredig R, Rolink AG. The earliest subpopulation of mouse thymocytes contains potent T, significant macrophage, and natural killer cell but no B-lymphocyte potential. Blood 2005 105 : 1930 1936. (Pubitemid 40731774)
19. Sambandam A, et al. Notch signaling controls the generation and differentiation of early T lineage progenitors. Nat Immunol 2005 6 : 663 670. (Pubitemid 41716739)
20. Tan JB, Visan I, Yuan JS, Guidos CJ. Requirement for Notch1 signals at sequential early stages of intrathymic T-cell development. Nat Immunol 2005 6 : 671 679. (Pubitemid 41716740)
21. Benz C, Bleul CC. A multipotent precursor in the thymus maps to the branching point of the T versus B lineage decision. J Exp Med 2005 202 : 21 31. (Pubitemid 41002907)
22. Bell JJ, Bhandoola A. The earliest thymic progenitors for T cells possess myeloid lineage potential. Nature 2008 452 : 764 767.
23. Wada H, et al. Adult T-cell progenitors retain myeloid potential. Nature 2008 452 : 768 772.
24. Taghon T, Yui MA, Rothenberg EV. Mast cell lineage diversion of T lineage precursors by the essential T cell transcription factor GATA-3. Nat Immunol 2007 8 : 845 855. (Pubitemid 47099037)
25. Schmitt TM, Ciofani M, Petrie HT, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Maintenance of T cell specification and differentiation requires recurrent notch receptor-ligand interactions. J Exp Med 2004 200 : 469 479. (Pubitemid 39121904)
26. Ciofani M, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Notch promotes survival of pre-T cells at the beta-selection checkpoint by regulating cellular metabolism. Nat Immunol 2005 6 : 881 888. (Pubitemid 43090442)
27. Hayes SM, Love PE. Strength of signal: a fundamental mechanism for cell fate specification. Immunol Rev 2006 209 : 170 175.
28. Lauritsen JP, Haks MC, Lefebvre JM, Kappes DJ, Wiest DL. Recent insights into the signals that control alphabeta/gammadelta-lineage fate. Immunol Rev 2006 209 : 176 190.
29. von Boehmer H. Unique features of the pre-T-cell receptor alpha-chain: not just a surrogate. Nat Rev Immunol 2005 5 : 571 577. (Pubitemid 40961334)
30. Taghon T, Yui MA, Pant R, Diamond RA, Rothenberg EV. Developmental and molecular characterization of emerging beta- and gammadelta-selected pre-T cells in the adult mouse thymus. Immunity 2006 24 : 53 64. (Pubitemid 43077200)
31. Ciofani M, Knowles GC, Wiest DL, von Boehmer H, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Stage-specific and differential Notch dependency at the alphabeta and gammadelta T lineage bifurcation. Immunity 2006 25 : 105 116. (Pubitemid 44066824)
32. Garbe AI, Krueger A, Gounari F, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, von Boehmer H. Differential synergy of Notch and T cell receptor signaling determines alphabeta versus gammadelta lineage fate. J Exp Med 2006 203 : 1579 1590. (Pubitemid 43877617)
33. Guidos CJ. Synergy between the pre-T cell receptor and Notch: cementing the alphabeta lineage choice. J Exp Med 2006 203 : 2233 2237. (Pubitemid 44498357)
34. Wolfer A, Wilson A, Nemir M, MacDonald HR, Radtke F. Inactivation of Notch1 impairs VDJbeta rearrangement and allows pre-TCR- independent survival of early alpha beta lineage thymocytes. Immunity 2002 16 : 869 879. (Pubitemid 34786485)
35. Maillard I, et al. The requirement for Notch signaling at the beta-selection checkpoint in vivo is absolute and independent of the pre-T cell receptor. J Exp Med 2006 203 : 2239 2245. (Pubitemid 44498358)
36. Huang EY, Gallegos AM, Richards SM, Lehar SM, Bevan MJ. Surface expression of Notch1 on thymocytes: correlation with the double-negative to double-positive transition. J Immunol 2003 171 : 2296 2304. (Pubitemid 37025534)
37. Ciofani M, et al. Obligatory role for cooperative signaling by pre-TCR and Notch during thymocyte differentiation. J Immunol 2004 172 : 5230 5239. (Pubitemid 38542020)
38. Garbe AI, von Boehmer H. TCR and Notch synergize in alphabeta versus gammadelta lineage choice. Trends Immunol 2007 28 : 124 131. (Pubitemid 46283691)
39. Weng AP, et al. c-Myc is an important direct target of Notch1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Genes Dev 2006 20 : 2096 2109. (Pubitemid 44157460)
40. Laky K, Fowlkes BJ. Presenilins regulate alphabeta T-cell development by modulating TCR signaling. J Exp Med 2007 204 : 2115 2129. (Pubitemid 47360873)
41. Pillai S, Cariappa A, Moran ST. Marginal zone B cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2005 23 : 161 196. (Pubitemid 40563168)
42. Martin F, Kearney JF. Marginal-zone B cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2002 2 : 323 335. (Pubitemid 37328755)
43. Srivastava B, Quinn WJ III., Hazard K, Erikson J, Allman D. Characterization of marginal zone B cell precursors. J Exp Med 2005 202 : 1225 1234. (Pubitemid 41586953)
44. Allman D, Pillai S. Peripheral B cell subsets. Curr Opin Immunol 2008 20 : 149 157.
45. Tanigaki K, et al. Notch-RBP-J signaling is involved in cell fate determination of marginal zone B cells. Nat Immunol 2002 3 : 443 450. (Pubitemid 34520793)
46. Saito T, et al. Notch2 is preferentially expressed in mature B cells and indispensable for marginal zone B lineage development. Immunity 2003 18 : 675 685. (Pubitemid 36588584)
47. Maillard I, et al. Mastermind critically regulates Notch-mediated lymphoid cell fate decisions. Blood 2004 104 : 1696 1702. (Pubitemid 39202276)
48. Wu L, Maillard I, Nakamura M, Pear WS, Griffin JD. The transcriptional coactivator Maml1 is required for Notch2-mediated marginal zone B-cell development. Blood 2007 110 : 3618 3623. (Pubitemid 350159629)
49. Schmitt TM, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. T-cell development, doing it in a dish. Immunol Rev 2006 209 : 95 102.
50. Hozumi K, et al. Delta-like 1 is necessary for the generation of marginal zone B cells but not T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol 2004 5 : 638 644. (Pubitemid 38811889)
51. Besseyrias V, et al. Hierarchy of Notch-Delta interactions promoting T cell lineage commitment and maturation. J Exp Med 2007 204 : 331 343. (Pubitemid 46294549)
52. Radtke F, et al. Deficient T cell fate specification in mice with an induced inactivation of Notch1. Immunity 1999 10 : 547 558. (Pubitemid 29262657)
53. Wilson A, MacDonald HR, Radtke F. Notch 1-deficient common lymphoid precursors adopt a B cell fate in the thymus. J Exp Med 2001 194 : 1003 1012. (Pubitemid 32953268)
54. Koch U, et al. Delta-like 4 is the essential, nonredundant ligand for Notch1 during thymic T cell lineage commitment. J Exp Med 2008 205 : 2515 2523.
55. Hozumi K, et al. Delta-like 4 is indispensable in thymic environment specific for T-cell development. J Exp Med 2008 205 : 2507 2513.
56. Tan JB, et al. Lunatic and manic fringe cooperatively enhance marginal zone B cell precursor competition for delta-like 1 in splenic endothelial niches. Immunity 2009 30 : 254 263.
57. Moriyama Y, et al. Delta-like 1 is essential for the maintenance of marginal zone B cells in normal mice but not in autoimmune mice. Int Immunol 2008 20 : 763 773. (Pubitemid 351791520)
58. Santos MA, et al. Notch1 engagement by Delta-like-1 promotes differentiation of B lymphocytes to antibody-secreting cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 : 15454 15459.
59. Sekine C, et al. Differential regulation of splenic CD8- dendritic cells and marginal zone B cells by Notch ligands. Int Immunol 2009 21 : 295 301.
60. Caton ML, Smith-Raska MR, Reizis B. Notch-RBP-J signaling controls the homeostasis of CD8-dendritic cells in the spleen. J Exp Med 2007 204 : 1653 1664. (Pubitemid 47048031)
61. Song R, et al. Mind bomb 1 in the lymphopoietic niches is essential for T and marginal zone B-cell development. J Exp Med 2008 205 : 2525 2536.
62. Moloney DJ, et al. Mammalian Notch1 is modified with two unusual forms of O-linked glycosylation found on epidermal growth factor-like modules. J Biol Chem 2000 275 : 9604 9611. (Pubitemid 30185192)
63. Wang Y, et al. Modification of epidermal growth factor-like repeats with O-fucose. Molecular cloning and expression of a novel GDP-fucose protein O-fucosyltransferase. J Biol Chem 2001 276 : 40338 40345.
64. Shao L, Moloney DJ, Haltiwanger R. Fringe modifies O-fucose on mouse Notch1 at epidermal growth factor-like repeats within the ligand-binding site and the Abruptex region. J Biol Chem 2003 278 : 7775 7782. (Pubitemid 36800510)
65. Panin VM, Shao L, Lei L, Moloney DJ, Irvine KD, Haltiwanger RS. Notch ligands are substrates for protein O-fucosyltransferase-1 and Fringe. J Biol Chem 2002 277 : 29945 29952.
66. Okajima T, Irvine KD. Regulation of notch signaling by o-linked fucose. Cell 2002 111 : 893 904. (Pubitemid 36109160)
67. Shi S, Stanley P. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 is an essential component of Notch signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 : 5234 5239. (Pubitemid 36542688)
68. Stahl M, Uemura K, Ge C, Shi S, Tashima Y, Stanley P. Roles of Pofut1 and O-fucose in mammalian Notch signaling. J Biol Chem 2008 283 : 13638 13651.
69. Okamura Y, Saga Y. Pofut1 is required for the proper localization of the Notch receptor during mouse development. Mech Dev 2008 125 : 663 673.
70. Okajima T, Reddy B, Matsuda T, Irvine KD. Contributions of chaperone and glycosyltransferase activities of O-fucosyltransferase 1 to Notch signaling. BMC Biol 2008 6 : 1.
71. Okajima T, Xu A, Lei L, Irvine KD. Chaperone activity of protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 promotes notch receptor folding. Science 2005 307 : 1599 1603. (Pubitemid 40354738)
72. Sasaki N, et al. Polarized exocytosis and transcytosis of Notch during its apical localization in Drosophila epithelial cells. Genes Cells 2007 12 : 89 103. (Pubitemid 44971099)
73. Sasamura T, et al. The O-fucosyltransferase O-fut1 is an extracellular component that is essential for the constitutive endocytic trafficking of Notch in Drosophila. Development 2007 134 : 1347 1356. (Pubitemid 46706041)
74. Bruckner K, Perez L, Clausen H, Cohen S. Glycosyltransferase activity of Fringe modulates Notch-Delta interactions. Nature 2000 406 : 411 415. (Pubitemid 30625560)
75. Moloney DJ, et al. Fringe is a glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch. Nature 2000 406 : 369 375. (Pubitemid 30625549)
76. Panin VM, Papayannopoulos V, Wilson R, Irvine KD. Fringe modulates Notch-ligand interactions. Nature 1997 387 : 908 912. (Pubitemid 27289592)
77. Cohen B, et al. Fringe boundaries coincide with Notch-dependent patterning centres in mammals and alter Notch-dependent development in Drosophila. Nat Genet 1997 16 : 283 288. (Pubitemid 27280213)
78. Johnston SH, Rauskolb C, Wilson R, Prabhakaran B, Irvine KD, Vogt TF. A family of mammalian Fringe genes implicated in boundary determination and the Notch pathway. Development 1997 124 : 2245 2254. (Pubitemid 27283245)
79. Evrard YA, Lun Y, Aulehla A, Gan L, Johnson RL. lunatic fringe is an essential mediator of somite segmentation and patterning. Nature 1998 394 : 377 381. (Pubitemid 28373834)
80. Zhang N, Gridley T. Defects in somite formation in lunatic fringe-deficient mice. Nature 1998 394 : 374 377. (Pubitemid 28373833)
81. Sparrow DB, et al. Mutation of the LUNATIC FRINGE Gene in Humans Causes Spondylocostal Dysostosis with a Severe Vertebral Phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 : 28 37. (Pubitemid 41833157)
82. Moran JL, Levorse JM, Vogt TF. Limbs move beyond the radical fringe. Nature 1999 399 : 742 743.
83. Zhang N, Norton CR, Gridley T. Segmentation defects of Notch pathway mutants and absence of a synergistic phenotype in lunatic fringe/radical fringe double mutant mice. Genesis 2002 33 : 21 28. (Pubitemid 34595199)
84. Hahn KL, Johnson J, Beres BJ, Howard S, Wilson-Rawls J. Lunatic fringe null female mice are infertile due to defects in meiotic maturation. Development 2005 132 : 817 828. (Pubitemid 40352840)
85. Chen J, Moloney DJ, Stanley P. Fringe modulation of Jagged1-induced Notch signaling requires the action of beta 4galactosyltransferase-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001 98 : 13716 13721.
86. Chen J, Lu L, Shi S, Stanley P. Expression of Notch signaling pathway genes in mouse embryos lacking b4galactosyltransferase-1. Gene Expr Patterns 2006 6 : 376 382. (Pubitemid 43285805)
87. Stanley P. Regulation of Notch signaling by glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007 17 : 530 535. (Pubitemid 350019017)
88. Shimizu K, Chiba S, Saito T, Kumano K, Takahashi T, Hirai H. Manic fringe and lunatic fringe modify different sites of the Notch2 extracellular region, resulting in different signaling modulation. J Biol Chem 2001 276 : 25753 25758.
89. Rampal R, et al. Lunatic fringe, manic fringe, and radical fringe recognize similar specificity determinants in O-fucosylated epidermal growth factor-like repeats. J Biol Chem 2005 280 : 42454 42463.
90. Yang LT, Nichols JT, Yao C, Manilay JO, Robey EA, Weinmaster G. Fringe glycosyltransferases differentially modulate Notch1 proteolysis induced by Delta1 and Jagged1. Mol Biol Cell 2005 16 : 927 942. (Pubitemid 40173985)
91. Tsukumo S, Hirose K, Maekawa Y, Kishihara K, Yasutomo K. Lunatic fringe controls T-cell differentiation through modulating notch signaling. J Immunol 2006 177 : 8365 8371. (Pubitemid 44893798)
92. Visan I, Tan JB, Yuan JS, Harper JA, Koch U, Guidos CJ. Regulation of T lymphopoiesis by Notch1 and Lunatic fringe-mediated competition for intrathymic niches. Nat Immunol 2006 7 : 634 643. (Pubitemid 43797345)
93. Phillips RL, et al. The genetic program of hematopoietic stem cells. Science 2000 288 : 1635 1640. (Pubitemid 30387428)
94. Heinzel K, Benz C, Martins VC, Haidl ID, Bleul CC. Bone marrow-derived hemopoietic precursors commit to the T cell lineage only after arrival in the thymic microenvironment. J Immunol 2007 178 : 858 868. (Pubitemid 46095158)
95. Jaleco AC, et al. Differential effects of Notch ligands Delta-1 and Jagged-1 in human lymphoid differentiation. J Exp Med 2001 194 : 991 1002.
96. Lehar SM, Dooley J, Farr AG, Bevan MJ. Notch ligands Delta1 and Jagged1 transmit distinct signals to T-cell precursors. Blood 2005 105 : 1440 1447. (Pubitemid 40223659)
97. Hrabe de Angelis M, McIntyre J II., Gossler A. Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue Dll1. Nature 1997 386 : 717 721. (Pubitemid 27193492)
98. Sheng Y, et al. Expression of Delta-like 1 in the splenic non-hematopoietic cells is essential for marginal zone B-cell development. Immunol Lett 2008 121 : 33 37.
99. Schroeder T, Kohlhof H, Rieber N, Just U. Notch signaling induces multilineage myeloid differentiation and up-regulates PU.1 expression. J Immunol 2003 170 : 5538 5548. (Pubitemid 36617842)
100. Cheng P, Nefedova Y, Corzo CA, Gabrilovich DI. Regulation of dendritic-cell differentiation by bone marrow stroma via different Notch ligands. Blood 2007 109 : 507 515. (Pubitemid 46105947)
101. Bigas A, Martin DI, Milner LA. Notch1 and Notch2 inhibit myeloid differentiation in response to different cytokines. Mol Cell Biol 1998 18 : 2324 2333. (Pubitemid 28152679)
102. Milner LA, Bigas A, Kopan R, Brashem-Stein C, Bernstein ID, Martin DI. Inhibition of granulocytic differentiation by mNotch1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93 : 13014 13019.
103. Ohishi K, Varnum-Finney B, Serda RE, Anasetti C, Bernstein ID. The Notch ligand, Delta-1, inhibits the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages but permits their differentiation into dendritic cells. Blood 2001 98 : 1402 1407.
104. de Pooter RF, Schmitt TM, de la Pompa JL, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Notch signaling requires GATA-2 to inhibit myelopoiesis from embryonic stem cells and primary hemopoietic progenitors. J Immunol 2006 176 : 5267 5275.
105. Smith PL, et al. Conditional control of selectin ligand expression and global fucosylation events in mice with a targeted mutation at the FX locus. J Cell Biol 2002 158 : 801 815. (Pubitemid 34920117)
106. Zhou L, et al. Notch-dependent control of myelopoiesis is regulated by fucosylation. Blood 2008 112 : 308 319.
107. Luo Y, Koles K, Vorndam W, Haltiwanger RS, Panin VM. Protein O-fucosyltransferase 2 adds O-fucose to thrombospondin type 1 repeats. J Biol Chem 2006 281 : 9393 9399. (Pubitemid 43864655)
108. Rampal R, Arboleda-Velasquez J, Nita-Lazar A, Kosik KS, Haltiwanger RS. Highly conserved O-fucose sites have distinct effects on notch1 function. J Biol Chem 2005 280 : 32133 32140.
109. Shi S, Ge C, Luo Y, Hou X, Haltiwanger RS, Stanley P. The threonine that carries fucose, but not fucose, is required for Cripto to facilitate Nodal signaling. J Biol Chem 2007 282 : 20133 20141.
110. Ge C, Stanley P. The O-fucose glycan in the ligand-binding domain of Notch1 regulates embryogenesis and T-cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 : 1539 1544. (Pubitemid 351346550)
111. Wolfer A, et al. Inactivation of Notch 1 in immature thymocytes does not perturb CD4 or CD8T-cell development. Nat Immunol 2001 2 : 235 241. (Pubitemid 33706000)
112. Tanigaki K, et al. Regulation of alphabeta/gammadelta T cell lineage commitment and peripheral T cell responses by Notch/RBP-J signaling. Immunity 2004 20 : 611 622. (Pubitemid 38638130)
113. Laky K, Fowlkes BJ. Notch signaling in CD4 and CD8 T-cell development. Curr Opin Immunol 2008 20 : 197 202.
114. Matsuura A, et al. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine is present on the extracellular domain of notch receptors. J Biol Chem 2008 283 : 35486 35495.
115. Hase S, Nishimura H, Kawabata S, Iwanaga S, Ikenaka T. The structure of (xylose)2glucose-O-serine 53 found in the first epidermal growth factor-like domain of bovine blood clotting factor IX. J Biol Chem 1990 265 : 1858 1861.
116. Acar M, et al. Rumi is a CAP10 domain glycosyltransferase that modifies Notch and is required for Notch signaling. Cell 2008 132 : 247 258. (Pubitemid 351172433)
117. Williams SA, Xia L, Cummings RD, McEver RP, Stanley P. Fertilization in mouse does not require terminal galactose or N-acetylglucosamine on the zona pellucida glycans. J Cell Sci 2007 120 : 1341 1349. (Pubitemid 46780027)