Notch1 and Notch2 inhibit myeloid differentiation in response to different cytokines

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 2324-2333

  Bigas, Anna ^a,c   Martin, David I K ^a,b   Milner, Laurie A ^a,b  

^a USA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Institut de Recerca Oncologica   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CYTOKINE; GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR; GRANULOCYTE MACROPHAGE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW CELL; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRANULOCYTE; HEMATOPOIESIS; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0031899677     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.4.2324     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., K. Matsuno, and M. E. Fortini. 1995. Notch signaling. Science 268:225-232.
2. Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., and P. Simpson. 1991. Choosing a cell fate: a view from the Notch locus. Trends Genet. 7:403-408.
3. Austin, J., and J. Kimble. 1987. glp-1 is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 51: 589-599.
4. Cagan, R. L., and D. F. Ready. 1989. Notch is required for successive cell decisions in the developing Drosophila retina. Genes Dev. 3:1099-1112.
5. Chitnis, A., D. Henrique, J. Lewis, D. Ish-Horowicz, and C. Kintner. 1995. Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta. Nature 375:761-766.
6. Coffman, C. R., P. Skoglund, W. A. Harris, and C. R. Kintner. 1993. Expression of an extracellular deletion of Xotch diverts cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Cell 73:659-671.
7. Corbin, V., A. M. Michelson, S. M. Abmayr, V. Neel, E. Alcamo, T. Maniatis, and M. W. Young. 1991. A role for the Drosophila neurogenic genes in mesoderm differentiation. Cell 67:311-323.
8. Fitzgerald, K., and I. Greenwald. 1995. Interchangeability of Caenorhabditis elegans DSL proteins and intrinsic signalling activity of their extracellular domains in vivo. Development 121:4275-4282.
9. Fortini, M. E., and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1993. Notch: neurogenesis is only part of the picture. Cell 75:1245-1247.
10. Fortini, M. E., I. Rebay, L. A. Caron, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1993. An activated Notch receptor blocks cell-fate commitment in the developing Drosophila eye. Nature 365:555-557.
11. Franco del Amo, F., D. E. Smith, P. J. Swiatek, M. Gendron-Maguire, R. J. Greenspan, A. P. McMahon, and T. Gridley. 1992. Expression pattern of Motch, a mouse homolog of Drosophila Notch, suggests an important role in early postimplantation mouse development. Development 115:737-744.
12. Greenberger, J. S., M. A. Sakakeeny, R. K. Humphries, C. J. Eaves, and R. J. Eckner. 1983. Demonstration of permanent factor-dependent multipotential (erythroid/neutrophil/basophil) hematopoietic progenitor cell lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:2931-2935.
13. Greenwald, I., and G. M. Rubin. 1992. Making a difference: the role of cell-cell interactions in establishing separate identities for equivalent cells. Cell 68:271-281.
14. Jonsson, J., Q. Wu, K. Nilsson, and R. A. Phillips. 1996. Use of a promoter-trap retrovirus to identify and isolate genes involved in differentiation of a myeloid progenitor cell line in vitro. Blood 87:1771-1779.
15. Kopan, R., J. S. Nye, and H. Weintraub. 1994. The intracellular domain of mouse Notch: a constitutively activated repressor of myogenesis directed at the basic helix-loop-helix region of MyoD. Development 120:2385-2396.
16. Kopan, R., E. H. Schroeter, J. Nye, and H. Weintraub. 1996. Signal transduction by activated mNotch: importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 1683-1688.
17. Kreider, B. L., P. D. Phillips, M. B. Prystowsky, N. Shirsat, J. H. Pierce, R. Tushinski, and G. Rovera. 1990. Induction of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) receptor by granulocyte CSF increases the differentiative options of a murine hematopoietic progenitor cell. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4846-4853.
18. Lardelli, M., J. Dahlstrand, and U. Lendahl. 1994. The novel Notch homologue mouse Notch 3 lacks specific epidermal growth factor-repeats and is expressed in proliferating neuroepithelium. Mech. Dev. 46:123-136.
19. Lardelli, M., and U. Lendahl. 1993. Motch A and Motch B - two mouse Notch homologues coexpressed in a wide variety of tissues. Exp. Cell Res. 204:364-372.
20. Li, L., L. A. Milner, Y. Deng, M. Iwata, A. Banta, L. Graf, S. Marcovina, C Friedman, B. Trask, L. Hood, and B. Torok-Storb. 1998. The human homolog of Rat Jagged, hJagged1, is expressed by marrow stroma and inhibits differentiation of 32D cells through interaction with Notch 1. Immunity 8:43-55.
21. Lieber, T., S. Kidd, E. Alcamo, V. Corbin, and M. W. Young. 1993. Antineurogenic phenotypes induced by truncated Notch proteins indicate a role in signal transduction and may point to a novel function for Notch in nuclei. Genes Dev. 7:1949-1965.
22. Lindsell, C. E., C. J. Shawber, J. Boulter, and G. Weinmaster. 1995. Jagged: a mammalian ligand that activates Notch1. Cell 80:909-917.
23. Metcalf, D. 1993. Hematopoietic regulators: redundancy or subtlety? Blood 82:3515-3523.
24. Migliaccio, G., A. R. Migliaccio, B. L. Kreider, G. Rovera, and J. W. Adamson. 1989. Selection of lineage-restricted cell lines immortalized at different stages of hematopoietic differentiation from the murine cell line 32D. J. Cell Biol. 109:833-841.
25. Miller, A. D., and G. J. Rosman. 1989. Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression. BioTechniques 7:980-990.
26. Milner, L. A., A. Bigas, R. Kopan, C. Brashem-Stein, M. Black, I. D. Bernstein, and D. I. K. Martin. 1996. Inhibition of granulocytic differentiation by mNotch1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13014-13019.
27. + hematopoietic precursors. Blood 83:2057-2062.
28. Mitsiadis, T. A., M. Lardelli, U. Lendahl, and I. Thesleff. 1995. Expression of Notch1, 2, and 3 is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and retinoic acid in the developing mouse tooth and associated with determination of ameloblast cell fate. J. Cell Biol. 130:407-418.
29. Moore, K. A., B. Pytowski, L. Witte, D. Hicklin, and I. R. Lemischka. 1997. Hematopoietic activity of a stromal cell transmembrane protein containing epidermal growth factor-like repeat motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 4011-4016.
30. Morrison, S. J., N. Uchida, and I. L. Weissman. 1995. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:35-71.
31. Muskavitch, M. A. T. 1994. Delta-Notch signaling and Drosophila cell fate choice. Dev. Biol. 166:415-430.
32. Nye, J. S., R. Kopan, and R. Axel. 1994. An activated Notch suppresses neurogenesis and myogenesis but not gliogenesis in mammalian cells. Development 120:2421-2430.
33. Ogawa, M. 1993. Differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 81:2844-2853.
34. Rebay, I., R. G. Fehon, and S. Artavanis-Tsakonas. 1993. Specific truncations of Drosophila Notch define dominant activated and dominant negative forms of the receptor. Cell 74:319-329.
35. Robey, E., D. Chang, A. Itano, D. Cado, H. Alexander, D. Lans, G. Weinmaster, and P. Salmon. 1996. An activated form of Notch influences the choice between CD4 and CD8 T cell lineages. Cell 87:483-492.
36. Roehl, H., and J. Kimble. 1993. Control of cell fate in C. elegans by a GLP-1 peptide consisting primarily of ankyrin repeats. Nature 364:632-635.
37. Ruohola, H., K. A. Bremer, D. Baker, J. R. Swedlow, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1991. Role of neurogenic genes in establishment of follicle cell fate and oocyte polarity during oogenesis in Drosophila. Cell 66:433-449.
38. Shivdasani, R. A., and S. H. Orkin. 1996. The transcriptional control of hematopoiesis. Blood 87:4025-1039.
39. Stern, M. J., and D. L. DeVore. 1994. Extending and connecting signaling pathways in C. elegans. Dev. Biol. 166:443-459.
40. Struhl, G., K. Fitzgerald, and I. Greenwald. 1993. Intrinsic activity of the Lin-12 and Notch intracellular domains in vivo. Cell 74:331-345.
41. Uyttendaele, H., G. Marazzi, G. Wu, Q. Yan, D. Sassoon, and J. Kitajewski. 1996. Notch4/int-3, a mammary proto-oncogene, is an endothelial cell-specific mammalian Notch gene. Development 122:2251-2259.
42. Valtieri, M., D. J. Tweardy, D. Caracciolo, K. Johnson, F. Mavilio, S. Altmann, D. Santoli, and G. Rovera. 1987. Cytokine-dependent granulocytic differentiation. Regulation of proliferative and differentiative responses in a murine progenitor cell line. J. Immunol. 138:3829-3835.
43. Washburn, T., E. Schweighoffer, T. Gridley, D. Chang, B. J. Fowlkes, D. Cado, and E. Robey. 1997. Notch activity influences the α/β versus γ/δ T cell lineage decision. Cell 88:833-843.
44. Weinmaster, G., V. J. Roberts, and G. Lemke. 1991. A homolog of Drosophila Notch expressed during mammalian development. Development 113: 199-205.
45. Weinmaster, G., V. J. Roberts, and G. Lemke. 1992. Notch2: a second mammalian Notch gene. Development 116:931-941.
46. Yochem, J., and I. Greenwald. 1989. glp-1 and lin-12, genes implicated in distinct cell-cell interactions in C. elegans, encode similar transmembrane proteins. Cell 58:553-563.