International human resource management and firm performance

Handbook Of Research In International Human Resource Management

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 91-112

  Paauwe, Jaap ^a   Farndale, Elaine ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649225884     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845428235.00011     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. d'Arcimoles, C.H. 1997. Human resource policies and company performance: a quantitative approach using longitudinal data. Organization Studies, 18(5): 857-74.
2. Arthur, J.B. 1994. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670-87.
3. Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1): 99-120.
4. Batt, R. 2002. Managing customer services: human resource practices, quit rates and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 587-97.
5. Baum, J.A.C. & C. Oliver. 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 187-218.
6. Becker, B.E., M.A. Huselid & D. Ulrich. 2001. The HR scorecard: linking people, strategy and performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Beer, M., B. Spector, P.R. Lawrence,D.Q. Mills & R.E.Walton. 1984. Managing human assets. New York: Free Press.
8. Björkman, I. & F. Xiucheng. 2002. Human resource management and the performance of Western firms in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(6): 853-64.
9. Boselie, P. 2002. Human resource management, work systems and performance: a theoretical-empirical approach. Tinbergen Institute Research Series, no.274. Thela Thesis, Netherlands.
10. Boselie, P., G. Dietz & C. Boon. 2005. Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3): 67-94.
11. Boselie, P., J. Paauwe & P.J. Jansen. 2001. Human resource management and performance: lessons from the Netherlands. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7): 1107-25.
12. Bowen,D.E. & C. Ostroff. 2004. Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of the 'strength' of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 203-21.
13. Boxall, P. & J. Purcell. 2003. Strategy and human resource management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Cappelli, P. & D. Neumark. 2001. Do high-performance work practices improve establishment- level outcomes? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4): 737-75.
15. Dacin, M.T. 1997. Isomorphism in context: the power and prescription of institutional norms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1): 46-81.
16. Deephouse,D.L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 147-66.
17. Delery, J.E. & D.H. Doty. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-35.
18. DiMaggio, P.J. & W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-60.
19. Edwards, T. 2004. The transfer of employment practices across borders in multinational companies. In A. Harzing & J. Van Ruysseveldt (eds), International human resource management: 389-410. Second edition. London: Sage.
20. Ferris, G.R., M.M. Arthur, H.M. Berkson, D.M. Kaplan, G. Harrel-Cook & D.D. Frink. 1998. Toward a social context theory of the human resource management-organization effectiveness relationship. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3): 235-64.
21. Fey, C.F. & I. Björkman. 2001. The effect of human resource management practices on MNC subsidiary performance in Russia. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1): 59-75.
22. Gerhart, B. 2004. Research on human resources and effectiveness: selected methodological challenges. Working paper presented at the International seminar on HRM: What's Next? Organized by the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
23. Gómez-Meija, L.R. & D.B. Balkin. 1992. Compensation, organizational strategy and firm performance. Cincinatti, OH: South-Western.
24. Gooderham, P.N. & O. Nordhaug. 2003. International management: cross-boundary challenges. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
25. Greenwood, R. & C.R. Hinings. 1996. Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1022-54.
26. Guest, D. 1997. Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 263-76.
27. Guest, D. 1999. Human resource management: the workers' verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3): 5-25.
28. Guest, D. & R. Peccei. 1994. The nature and causes of effective human resource management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(2): 219-41.
29. Guest, D., J. Michie, N. Conway & M. Sheehan. 2003. Human resource management and corporate performance in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2): 291-314.
30. Hartog, D.N. den & R.M. Verburg. 2004. High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(1): 55-78.
31. Hiltrop, J.M. 1999. The quest for the best: human resource practices to attract and retain talent. European Management Journal, 17(4): 422-30.
32. Huselid, M.A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-72.
33. Ichniowski, C. & K. Shaw. 1999. The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: an international comparison of US and Japanese plants. Management Science, 45(5): 704-21.
34. Kalleberg, A.L. & J.W. Moody. 1994. Human resource management and organizational performance. American Behavioural Scientist, 7: 948-62.
35. Kanfer, R. 1994. Work motivation: new directions in theory and research. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (eds), Key reviews in managerial psychology: 158-88. New York: Wiley.
36. Koch, M.J. & R.G. McGrath. 1996. Improving labor productivity: human resource policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17(5): 335-54.
37. Lammers, C.J., A.A. Mijs & W.J. van Noort. 2000. Organisaties vergelijkende wijs: Ontwikkeling en relevantie van het sociologisch denken over organisaties. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.
38. Laroche, P. 2001. The impact of human resource management practices and industrial relations on the firm performance: an empirical study in the French context. Paper presented at the Global HRM Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
39. Legge, K. 2005. Human resource management: Rhetorics and realities. Anniversary edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. MacDuffie, J.P. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 197-221.
41. McCurry, L. & R. McIvor. 2002. Agile manufacturing: 21st century strategy for manufacturing on the periphery? Irish Journal of Management, 23(2): 75-93.
42. McNabb, R. & K. Whitfield. 1997. Unions, flexibility, team working and financial performance. Organization Studies, 18(5): 821-38.
43. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-79.
44. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resourcebased views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 697-713.
45. Osterman, P. 1994. How common is workplace transformation and how can we explain who does it? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(2): 173-88.
46. Paauwe, J. 1989. Sociaal ondernemingsbeleid: Tussen dwang en ambities. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Samson Bedrijfsinformatie.
47. Paauwe, J. 1994. Organiseren: Een grensoverschrijdende passie. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Samson Bedrijfsinformatie.
48. Paauwe, J. 1998. HRM and performance: The linkage between resources and institutional context. RIBES Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
49. Paauwe, J. 2004. HRM and performance: unique approaches for achieving long-term viability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Paauwe, J. & P. Boselie. 2003. Challenging 'strategic HRM' and the relevance of institutional settings. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3): 56-70.
51. Paauwe, J. & P. Boselie. 2005. HRM and performance: what next? Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4).
52. Paauwe, J. & R. Richardson. 1997. Introduction to special issue on HRM and performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3): 257-62.
53. Park, H.J., H. Mitsuhashi, C.F. Fey & I. Björkman. 2003. The effect of human resource management practices on Japanese subsidiary performance: a partial mediating model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(8): 1391-406.
54. Peccei, R. 2004. Human resource management and the search for the happy work place. Rotterdam: Erasmus Institute of Management (ERIM).
55. Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive advantage through people. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
56. Pfeffer, J. 1995. Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1): 55-69.
57. Pfeffer, J. 1998. The human equation: building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
58. Pot, F. & J. Paauwe. 2004. Continuing divergence of HRM practices: US and European-based company-level HRM practices. In J. Paauwe (ed.), HRM and performance: unique approaches for achieving long-term viability: 155-78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Purcell, J. 2004. Business strategies and human resource management: uneasy bedfellows or strategic partners? Working paper presented at the International seminar on HRM:What's Next? Organized by the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
60. Schuler, R.S. & S.E. Jackson. 1987. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 209-13.
61. Ten Have, K. 1993. Markt, organisatie en personeel in de industrie: een empirisch onderzoek naar productieregimes als configuraties van arbeidsdeling en arbeidsrelaties. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
62. Teo, S.T.T. 2002. Effectiveness of a corporate HR department in an Australian public sector entity during commercialization and corporatization. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1): 89-105.
63. Truss, K. & L. Gratton. 2003. The three-dimensional people strategy: putting human resources policies into action. Academy of Management Executive, 17(3): 74-86.
64. Whitley, R. 1992. European business systems. Firms and markets in their national contexts. London: Sage Publications.
65. Wood, S. 1999. Human resource management and performance. International Journal of Management Review, 4(1): 367-413.
66. Wright, P.M. & T.M. Gardner. 2001. Theoretical and empirical challenges in studying the HR practices: firm performance relationship. Paper presented at the ERIM Seminars, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.
67. Wright, P.M. & L.H. Nishii. 2004. Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: integrating multiple levels of analysis.Working paper presented at the International seminar on HRM: What's Next? Organized by the Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands.
68. Wright, P., G.C. McMahan & A. McWilliams. 1994. Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2): 301-26.