Bimolecular recombination in ambipolar organic field effect transistors

Organic Electronics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 994-997

  Charrier, D S H ^a   Vries, T de ^a   Mathijssen, S G J ^a,b   Geluk, E J ^a   Smits, E C P ^b,c   Kemerink, M ^a   Janssen, R A J ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bimolecular recombination; Deconvolution; Organic field effect transistor; Scanning Kelvin probe microscopy

Indexed keywords

CONVOLUTION; DECONVOLUTION; PROBES; SURFACE POTENTIAL;

BIMOLECULAR RECOMBINATION; CAPACITIVE COUPLINGS; CONVOLUTION METHODS; ELECTRON-HOLE RECOMBINATION; LANGEVIN RECOMBINATION; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; RECOMBINATION ZONES; SCANNING KELVIN PROBE MICROSCOPY;

ORGANIC FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS;

EID: 67649210463     PISSN: 15661199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. See e.g. Groves C., and Greenham N.C. Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 155205 and references therein
2. For a recent review see e.g. Zaumseil J., and Sirringhaus H. Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 1296
3. Takenobu T., Bisri S.Z., Takahashi T., Yahiro M., Adachi C., and Iwasa Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 066601
4. For a recent review see e.g. Samuel I.D.W., and Turnbull G.A. Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 1272
5. Naber R.C.G., Bird M., and Sirringhaus H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 023301
6. Namdas E.B., Tong M., Ledochowitsch P., Mednick S.R., Yuen J.D., Moses D., and Heeger A.J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21 (2009) 799
7. Verlaak S., Cheyns D., Debucquoy M., Arkhipov V., and Heremans P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 (2004) 2405
8. Kemerink M., Charrier D.S.H., Smits E.C.P., Mathijssen S.G.J., de Leeuw D.M., and Janssen R.A.J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 033312
9. Nonnenmacher M., O'Boyle M.P., and Wickramasinghe H.K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) 2921
10. Shen Y., Barnett D.M., and Pinsky P.M. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79 (2008) 023711
11. Liscio A., Palermo V., and Samori P. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 (2008) 907
12. Strassburg E., Boag A., and Rosenwaks Y. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 (2005) 083705
13. Schwartzman A., Grunbaum E., Strassburg E., Lepkifker E., Boag A., Rosenwaks Y., Glatzel T., Barkay Z., Mazzer M., and Barnham K. J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 084310
14. Jacobs H.O., Leuchtmann P., Homan O.J., and Stemmer A. J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 1168
15. Charrier D.S.H., Kemerink M., Smalbrugge B.E., de Vries T., and Janssen R.A.J. ACS Nano 2 (2008) 622
16. Gil A., Colchero J., Gómez-Herrero J., and Baró A.M. Nanotechnology 14 (2003) 332
17. Brigham E.O. The Fast Fourier Transform and its Applications (1988), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
18. 1). To avoid extrapolation to low frequencies in Fourier space, the size of the reference scan was at least the size of the to-be-converted measurement or calculation. In the inversion procedure, a high frequency cutoff was used to avoid division-by-zero errors at frequencies where F(h) is close to zero.
19. Smits E.C.P., Mathijssen S.G.J., Cölle M., Mank A.J.G., Bobbert P.A., Blom P.W.M., de Boer B., and de Leeuw D.M. Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 125202