Secondary school students' collaboration during dyadic debates face-to-face and through computer chat

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 961-969

  Marttunen, Miika J ^a   Laurinen, Leena I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Arguments; Collaboration; Computer mediated communication; Debates; Interpersonal interaction; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTS; COLLABORATION; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DEBATES; INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION; SECONDARY EDUCATION;

COMMUNICATION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 65849507342     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 1-25
2. Arvaja M., Häkkinen P., Rasku-Puttonen H., and Eteläpelto A. Social processes and knowledge building during small group interaction in a school science project. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46 2 (2002) 161-179
3. Austin J.L. How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in. In: Urmson J.O. (Ed) (1962), Clarendon Press, Oxford
4. Baker M. Forms of cooperation in dyadic problem-solving. In: Salembier P., and Benchekroum H. (Eds). Cooperation and complexity in sociotechnical systems Vol. 16 (2002), Hermés, Paris 587-620
5. Burnett C. Learning to chat: Tutor participation in synchronous online chat. Teaching in Higher Education 8 2 (2003) 247-261
6. Chun D. Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System 22 1 (1994) 17-31
7. Clark H.H., and Brennan S.E. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick L.B., Levine J.M., and Teasley S.D. (Eds). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 127-149
8. Curtis R. Analyzing students' conversations in chat room discussion groups. College Teaching 52 4 (2004) 143-148
9. Darhower L.M. Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal 19 2 (2002) 249-277
10. Dennis J.K. Problem-based learning in online vs. face-to-face environments. Education for Health 16 2 (2003) 198-209
11. Dillenbourg P. Introduction: What do you mean by "Collaborative Learning"?. In: Dillenbourg P. (Ed). Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches (1999), Earli/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 1-19
12. Felton M., and Kuhn D. The development of argumentative discourse skill. Discourse Processes 32 2&3 (2001) 135-153
13. Freiermuth M. Internet chat: Collaborating and learning via e-conversations. TESOL Journal 11 3 (2002) 36-40
14. Fuchs L.S., Fuchs D., Kazdan S., Karns K., Calhoon M.B., Hamlett C.L., et al. Effects of workgroup and size on students' productivity during collaborative work on complex tasks. The Elementary School Journal 100 3 (2000) 183-212
15. Graesser A.C., and Person N.K. Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31 1 (1994) 104-137
16. Harmon S., and Jones M. An analysis of situated web-based instruction. Educational Media International 38 4 (2001) 271-280
17. Hightower R., and Sayeed L. The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion. Computers in Human Behaviour 11 1 (1995) 33-44
18. Kerr D.S., and Murthy U.S. Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams. A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decision and Negotiation 13 4 (2004) 381-399
19. King A. Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In: ÓDonnell A., and King A. (Eds). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 87-115
20. Kinney S., and Dennis A. Reevaluating media richness: Cues, feedback, and task. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh Hawaii international conference on system sciences (1994), Wailea, HI, USA 21-30
21. Kneser C., and Ploetzner R. Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: Observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction 11 1 (2001) 53-83
22. Kuhn D. How do people know?. Psychological Science 12 1 (2001) 1-8
23. Kuhn D., Shawn V., and Felton M. Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 15 3 (1997) 287-315
24. Laurinen L., and Marttunen M. Written arguments and collaborative speech acts in practising the argumentative power of language through chat debates. Computers and Composition 40 3 (2007) 230-246
25. Litosseliti L., Marttunen M., Laurinen L., and Salminen T. Computer-based and face-to-face collaborative argumentation in secondary schools in England and Finland. Education, Communication & Information 5 2 (2005) 131-146
26. Marttunen, M. (1997). Studying argumentation in higher education by electronic mail. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research 127: University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
27. Marttunen M., and Laurinen L. Vuorovaikutusta verkossa ja suullisesti - yhteisöllisen argumentoinnin ja kriittisen ajattelun edistäminen [Network and face-to-face interaction - fostering collaborative argumentation and critical thinking]. In: Sallila P., and Kalli P. (Eds). Verkot ja teknologia aikuisopiskelun tukena. [Networks and technology in support of adult education] Aikuiskasvatuksen 42. vuosikirja. Kansanvalistusseura ja Aikuiskasvatuksen Tutkimusseura (2001), Gummerus, Jyväskylä 152-176
28. Marttunen M., and Laurinen L. Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science 29 2 (2001) 127-153
29. Marttunen M., Laurinen L., Litosseliti L., and Lund K. Argumentation skills as prerequisites for collaborative learning among Finnish, French and English secondary school students. Educational Research and Evaluation 11 4 (2005) 365-384
30. McAlister S., Ravenscroft A., and Scanlon E. Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 3 (2004) 194-204
31. Mercer N., and Littleton K. Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. A sociocultural approach (2007), Routledge, London
32. Nussbaum E.M., and Sinatra G.M. Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28 3 (2003) 384-395
33. Ogden L. Collaborative tasks, collaborative children: An analysis of reciprocity during peer interaction at key stage 1. British Educational Research Journal 26 2 (2000) 211-226
34. Ploetzner R., Dillenbourg P., Preier M., and Traum D. Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In: Dillenbourg P. (Ed). Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches (1999), Earli/Elsevier Science, Amsterdam 103-121
35. Ravenscroft A. Designing argumentation for conceptual development. Computers & Education 34 3-4 (2000) 241-255
36. Saab N., van Joolingen W.R., and van Hout-Wolters B.H.A.M. Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75 4 (2005) 603-621
37. Saab N., van Joolingen W.R., and van Hout-Wolters B.H.A.M. Supporting communication in a collaborative discovery learning environment: The effect of instruction. Instructional Science 35 1 (2007) 73-98
38. Salminen T., Marttunen M., and Laurinen L. Grounding and counter-argumentation during face-to-face and synchronous network debates in secondary school. In: van Eemeren F.H., Blair J.A., Willard C.A., and Snoeck Henkemans A.F. (Eds). Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (2003), Sic Sat. International center for the study of argumentation 933-936
39. Schweizer K., Paechter M., and Weidenmann B. Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. Journal of Educational Media 28 2-3 (2003) 211-224
40. Shachar H., and Fisher S. Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of students in 11th grade chemistry classes. Learning and Instruction 14 1 (2004) 69-87
41. Springer L., Stanne M.E., and Donovan S.S. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 69 1 (1999) 21-51
42. Stein N.L., and Bernas R. The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In: Andriessen J., and Coirier P. (Eds). Foundations of argumentative text processing (1999), Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 97-116
43. Storch N. How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research 5 1 (2001) 29-53
44. Tao, P.-K. (2000). Developing understanding through confronting varying views: The case of solving qualitative physics problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, USA.
45. Teasley S.D., and Roschelle J. Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In: Lajoie S., and Derry S.J. (Eds). Computer as cognitive tools (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, Hillsdale 229-258
46. Treleaven L., and Cecez-Kecmanovic D. Collaborative learning in a Web-mediated environment: A study of communicative practices. Studies in Continuing Education 23 2 (2001) 169-183
47. Uribe D., Klein J.D., and Sullivan H. The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving ill-defined problems. Educational Technology Research & Development 51 1 (2003) 5-19
48. van Amelsvoort M. A space of debate. How diagrams support collaborative argumentation-based learning. Dutch Interuniversity Center for Educational Research (ICO) (2006), PrintPartners Ipskamp, Enschede
49. van Boxtel C., van der Linden J., and Kanselaar G. Deep processing in a collaborative learning environment. In: Cowie H., and van der Aalsvoort G. (Eds). Social interaction in learning and instruction. The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (2000), Pergamon, Amsterdam 61-178
50. van der Meijden H., and Veenman S. Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in a primary school setting. Computers in Human Behavior 21 5 (2005) 831-859
51. van Drie J., van Boxtel C., Jaspers J., and Kanselaar G. Effects of representational guidance on domain-specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behaviour 21 4 (2005) 575-602
52. Veerman A. Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue. In: Andriessen J., Baker M., and Suthers D. (Eds). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 117-143
53. Veerman A.L., Andriessen J.E.B., and Kanselaar G. Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education 34 3-4 (2000) 269-290
54. Veerman A., Andriessen J., and Kanselaar G. Collaborative argumentation in academic education. Instructional Science 30 3 (2002) 155-186
55. Weger H., and Aakhus M. Arguing in internet chat rooms: Argumentative adaptations to chat room design and some consequences for public deliberation at a distance. Argumentation and Advocacy 40 Summer (2003) 23-38