Designing argumentation for conceptual development

Computers and Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 241-255

  Ravenscroft, Andrew ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Learning in virtual environments; Teaching in virtual environments; The changing role of the learner; Theories of learning and virtuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001217602     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(99)00048-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Carlson L. Dialogue games: an approach to discourse analysis. 1983;Reidel, Dordrecht.
2. Chi M.T.H., Bassok M., Lewis M.W., Reimann P., Glaser R. Self explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science. 13:1989;145-182.
3. Clement J. Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics. 50:(1):1982;66-71.
4. Dieng R., Corby O., Lapalut S. Acquisition and exploitation of gradual knowledge. International Journal of human-Computer studies. 42:1995;465-499.
5. Goldberg M.W, Salary S. An update on WebCT (World-Wide-Web Course Tools) - a tool for the creation of sophisticated web-based learning environments. Proceedings of NAUWeb '97 - Current Practices in Web-Based Course Development, June 12-15, Flagstaff, AZ :1997.
6. Gunstone R., Watts M. Force and motion. Driver R., Guesne E., Tiberghien A. Children's ideas in science. 1985;85-104 Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
7. Hartley, J. R. (1998). Qualitative reasoning and conceptual change: computer based support in understanding science. In Special Issue: Winkels, R., & Bredeweg, B. (Guest Eds.), Interactive Learning Environments: The Use of Qualitative Reasoning Techniques, Vol. 5, Nos. 1-2, pp. 53-64.
8. Hartley J.R., Byard M., Mallen C. Qualitative modeling and conceptual change in science students. Birnbaum L. The International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Proceedings of the 1991 Conference, Northwestern University of Evanston, IL. 1991;222-230 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA.
9. Hintikka J. Rules utilities and strategies in dialogical games. Vaina L., Hintikka J. Cognitive constraints on communication. 1984;277-307 Reidel, Dordrecht.
10. Levin L.A., Moore J.A. Dialogue-games: metacommunication structures for natural language interaction. Cognitive Science. 1:(4):1977;395-420.
11. MacKenzie J.D. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 8:1979;117-133.
12. Moore, D. J. (1993). Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
13. Myers, B. A., Guise, D., Dannenberg, R. B., Vander Zanden, B., Kosbie, D., Marchal, P. E., Pervin, E., & Mickish, A. (1992). The Garnet manuals (2.0). Technical Report, CMU-CS-90-117-R2, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
14. Pilkington R.M. Intelligent help: communicating with knowledge based systems. 1992;Paul Chapman, London.
15. Pilkington R.M., Mallen C. Dialogue games to support reasoning and reflection in diagnostic tasks. Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, Lisbon, Portugal, September 30-October 2 :1996;220-225.
16. Pilkington R.M., Hartley J.R., Hintze D., Moore D.J. Learning to argue and arguing to learn: an interface for computer-based dialogue games. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 3:(3):1992;275-285.
17. Pilkington R.M., Parker-Jones C. Interacting with computer-based simulation. Computers & Education. 27:(1):1996;1-14.
18. Ravenscroft, A. (1997). Learning as knowledge refinement: a computer based approach. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
19. Ravenscroft A., Hartley J.R. Learning as knowledge refinement: designing a dialectical pedagogy for conceptual change. Lajoie S., Vivet M. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications Volume 50, artificial intelligence in education. open learning environments: new computational technologies to support learning, exploration and collaboration. 1999;155-162 IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
20. Ravenscroft A., Tait K., Hughes I.E. Beyond the media: knowledge level interaction and guided integration for CBL systems. Computers & Education. 30:(1/2):1998;49-56.
21. Searle J.R. Speech acts: An essay in the Philosophy of Language. 1969;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Twigger D., Byard M., Draper S., Driver R., Hartley J., Hennessey S., Mallen C., Mohamed R., O'Malley C., O'Shea T., Scanlon E. The conceptual change in science project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 7:(2):1991;144-155.
23. Van Joolingen W.R. QMaPS: qualitative reasoning for simulation learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 6:(1):1995;67-89.
24. Vygotsky L. Mind in society. 1974;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Walton, D., (1984). Logical dialogue-games and fallacies. Ph.D. thesis, Lanham, University Press, America.