Of practicalities and perspective: What is fair in group decision making?

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 383-407

  Jacobs, Elizabeth ^a   Christensen, P Niels ^b   Prislin, Radmila ^c  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b RADFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL CHANGE;

EID: 65349150746     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01605.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, A. (1986). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
3. Azzi, A. E. (1992). Procedural justice and the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Studies in the United States and South Africa. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 736-747.
4. Azzi, A. E., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Votes without power: Procedural justice as mutual control in majority-minority relations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 124-155.
5. Brendl, M. C., & Higgins, T. E. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
7. Dovidio, J. F., Saguy, T., & Shnabel, N. (2009). Cooperation and conflict within groups: Bridging intragroup and intergroup processes. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 429-449.
8. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
9. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
10. Gordijn, E. H., De Vries, N. K., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attributions and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1315-1326.
11. Greenberg, J. (1980). Attentional focus and locus of performance causality as determinants of equity behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 579-585.
12. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Preston, J. (2000). Upending the status quo: Cognitive complexity in U.S. Supreme Court justices who overturn legal precedent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1013-1022.
13. Jost, J. T., & Azzi, A. E. (1996). Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 349-365.
14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
15. Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
16. King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., & Beal, D. J. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in diverse workgroups. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 261-285.
17. Klein, O., & Azzi, A. E. (2001). Procedural justice in majority-minority relations: Studies involving Belgian linguistic groups. Social Justice Research, 14, 25-44.
18. Leung, K., Tong, K. K., & Lind, A. E. (2007). Realpolitik versus fair process: Moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 476-489.
19. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Lind, A. E., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
21. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
22. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. New York: Academic Press.
23. Population Reference Bureau. (2006, May). In the news: U.S. population is now one-third minority. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.prb.org/Articles/2006/ IntheNewsUSPopulationIsNowOneThirdMinority.aspx?p=1.
24. Prislin, R., Brewer, M., & Wilson, D. J. (2002). Changing majority and minority positions within a group versus an aggregate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 640-647.
25. Prislin, R., & Christensen, P. N. (2002). Group conversion versus group expansion on modes of change in majority and minority positions: All losses hurt but only some gains gratify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1095-1102.
26. Prislin, R., & Christensen, P. N. (2005a). The effects of social change within a group on membership preferences: To leave or not to leave. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 595-609.
27. Prislin, R., & Christensen, P. N. (2005b). Social change in the aftermath of successful minority influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 43-73.
28. Prislin, R., Christensen, P. N., & Jacobs, E. (2005). Group size, power allocation, and change: Effects on conceptual representations of group interaction. Review of Psychology: International Journal of Croatian Psychological Association, 12, 81-89.
29. Prislin, R., Limbert, W., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 385-397.
30. Prislin, R., Levine, J. M., & Christensen, P. N. (2006). When reasons matter: Quality of support affects reactions to increasing and consistent agreement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 593-601.
31. Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair-or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 201-211.
32. Rasinski, K. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Social psychology and political behavior. In S. Long (Ed.), Political behavior annual (Vol. 1, pp. 103-128). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
34. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
35. Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14, 305-326.
36. Smith, H. J., Tyler, T., Huo, Y., Ortiz, D., & Lind, E. A. (1998). The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 470-493.
37. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2000). Using Multivariate Statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39. Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
40. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Troyer, L., & Youngreen, R. (2009). Conflict and creativity in groups. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 409-427.
42. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
43. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
44. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349-361.
45. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model of justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
46. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 959-629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
47. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, O. John, & R. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Van Den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.
49. Wenzel, M. (2004). Social identification as a determinant of concerns about individual-, group-, and inclusive-level justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 70-87.