Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, Attributions, and information processing

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1315-1326

  Gordijn, Ernestine H ^a,b   De Vries, Nanne K ^a,c   De Dreu, Carsten K W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944541128     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014616702236819     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
2. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1-70.
3. Baker, S., & Petty, R. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4. Brehm, J. W., & Mann, M. (1975). Effect of importance of freedom and attraction to group members on influence produced by group pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 816-824.
5. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Clark, R. D. (1998). Minority influence: The role of the rate of minority defection and persuasive arguments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 787-796.
7. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
8. De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1993). Numerical support, information processing and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 647-662.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., De Vries, N. K., Gordijn, E. H., & Schuurman, M. S. (1999). Effects of convergent-divergent processing on attitude change towards majority and minority supported arguments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 329-348.
10. De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-172). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W.,& Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 424-435.
12. Kerr, N. L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702.
13. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R., Hansen, C., & Hymes, J. (1987). Gaining and losing social support: Momentum in decision making groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 119-145.
14. Kiesler, C. A., & Pallak, M. S. (1975). Minority influence: The effect of majority reactionaries and defectors, and minority and majority compromises, upon majority opinion and attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 237-256.
15. Levine, J. M. (1980). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Levine, J. M., & Ranelli, C. J. (1978). Majority reaction to shifting and stable attitude deviates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 55-70.
17. Levine, J. M., Sroka, K. R., & Snyder, H. N. (1977). Group support and reaction to stable and shifting agreement/disagreement. Sociometry, 40, 214-224.
18. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
19. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and non-systematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
20. Moscovici, S. (1980). Towards a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 209-239.
21. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
22. Prislin, R., Limbert, W. M., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 385-397.
23. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
24. Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leek, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193.