Microjustice and macrojustice in the allocation of resources between experimental groups

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 349-365

  Jost, John T ^a,b   Azzi, Assaad E ^a,c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21344473732     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1996.9714013     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.
2. Azzi, A. E. (1992). Procedural justice and the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Experiments in the U.S. and South Africa. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin. 18, 736-747.
3. Azzi, A. E. (1993). Implicit and category-based allocations of decision-making power in majority-minority relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 203-228.
4. Bomstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C., & Thibaut, J. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321-350.
5. Branthwaite, A., Doyle, S., & Lightbown, N. (1979). The balance between fairness and discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 149-163.
6. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
7. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Micro and macro justice. In M. J. Lemer & S. Lemer (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 173-202). New York: Plenum.
8. Brown, R. J., & Deschampes, J. C. (1980/1981). Discriminations entre individus et entre groupes [Discrimination between individuals and between groups]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 34(348), 185-195.
9. Brown, R. J., Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Minimal group situations and intergroup discrimination: Comments on the paper by Aschenbrenner and Schaefer. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 399-414.
10. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
11. Diehl, M. (1989). Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: The limits of equity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227-238.
12. Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of sociul psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263-292). New York: Wiley.
13. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77-94). New York: Plenum.
14. Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., & Willis, R. H. (Eds.). (1980). Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum.
15. Green, D. P. (1992). The price elasticity of mass preferences. The American Political Science Review, 86, 1-22.
16. Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.). (1982a). Equity and justice in social behavior. San Diego: Academic Press.
17. Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982b). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 437-469). San Diego: Academic Press.
18. Hewstone, M., Argyle, M., & Furnham, A. (1982). Favouritism, fairness and joint profit in long-term relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 283-295.
19. Jasso, G. (1983). Fairness of individual rewards and fairness of the reward distribution: Specifying the inconsistency between the micro and macro principles of justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 185-199.
20. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
21. Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions? Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 425-429.
22. Lane, R. E. (1988). Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets. Social Justice Research, 2, 177-192.
23. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Mikula, G. (Ed.). (1980). Justice and social interaction. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
27. Mummendey, A., & Schreiber, H.-J. (1983). Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differentiation from outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 389-397.
28. Ng, S. H. (1982). Power and intergroup discrimination. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 179-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology. 20, 221-240.
30. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
31. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1984). Minimal majorities and minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 35-52.
32. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173-211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
34. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
35. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. F., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology. I, 149-177.
36. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
37. Tomblom, K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. Advances in Group Processes, 5, 141-168.
38. Tomblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D. R., & Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs, U.S. A. international Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-77.
39. Turner, J. C. (1980). Fairness or discrimination in intergroup behaviour? A reply to Bran-thwaite, Doyle and Lightbown. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 131-147.
40. Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on… ‘The measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm.’ European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
41. Wetherell, M. (1982). Cross-cultural studies of minimal groups: Implications for the social identity theory of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 207-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.