Conflict and creativity in groups

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 409-427

  Troyer, Lisa ^a   Youngreen, Reef ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; INNOVATION; SOCIAL CONFLICT;

EID: 65349186654     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: 15404560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01606.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brown, V., & Paulus, P. B. (1996). A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 27, 91-114.
2. Cohen, B. P., & Silver, S. D. (1989). Group structure and information exchange: Introduction to a theory. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr. & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 160-181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Crandall, V. C. (1963). Achievement. In H. W. Stevenson (Ed.), The 62nd yearbook of the national society for the study of education: Part 1, child psychology (pp. 5-26). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
4. Crandall, V. C., Dewey, R., Katkovsky, W., & Preston, A. (1964). Parents' attitudes and behaviors and grade school children's academic achievements. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 104, 53-66.
5. Crano, W. D., & Seyranian, V. (2009). How minorities prevail: The context/comparison-leniency contract model. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 335-363.
6. Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7, 466-492.
7. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
8. Dovidio, J. F., Saguy, T., & Shnabel, N. (2009). Cooperation and conflict within groups: Bridging intragroup and intergroup processes. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 429-449.
9. Gersick, C. J.G. (1988). Time and transition inwork teams: Toward a newmodel of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
10. Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 10-36.
11. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
12. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Kaplan, R. E. (1979). The conspicuous absence of evidence that process consultation enhances task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 346-360.
14. King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., & Bel, D. J. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in diverse workgroups. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 261-285.
15. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
16. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic review. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 13-23.
19. Nemeth, C., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
20. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
21. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
22. Paulus, P. B., & Dizindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.
23. Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement situations. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
24. Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1989). Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback. Sex Roles, 21I, 725-747.
25. Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others' evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221-240.
26. Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. (1978). Perceived sex differences in managerially relevant characteristics. Sex Roles, 14, 837-843.
27. Seta, J. J., Seta, C. E., & Donaldson, S. (1991). The impact of comparison processes on coactors' frustration and willingness to expend effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 560-568.
28. Silver, S. D., & Troyer, L. (1994). Managing information exchange to increase the quality of group decisions: Conceptual foundations for an event-sensitive GDSS. Proceedings of 23rd Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 94-107). San Diego: Western Decision Sciences Institute.
29. Silver, S. D., & Troyer, L. (1998). Judging the consequences of evaluation by others in status heterogeneous groups: Biases in the microlevel heuristics of group information exchange. In E. J. Lawler, J. Skvoretz, & J. Szmatka (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 15, pp. 103-132). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Crutchfield, J. H. (1994). Status differentiation and information exchange in face-to-face and computer-mediated idea generation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 108-123.
31. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Rainwater, J. (1988). Group structure and information exchange in innovative problem-solving. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 169-194). Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
32. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Troyer, L. (1998). Effects of experimenter-inserted negative evaluations on idea generation and information exchange in computer-mediated groups. Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 440-443). Atlanta, GA: Decision Sciences Institute.
33. Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Troyer, L. (2000). Effects of member status on the exchange of information in team decision-making: When team-building isn't enough. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team development (Vol. 7, pp. 21-51). New York: Elsevier.
34. Silver, S. D., Troyer, L., & Marks, B. (1998). System for the management and analysis of real-time teams (SMART). Software.
35. Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decision. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Stake, J. E. (1983). Ability level, evaluative feedback, and sex differences in performance expectancy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 48-58.
37. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
38. Troyer, L. (2002). The relation between experimental standardization and theoretical development in group processes research. In J. Szmatka, M. Lovaglia, & K. Wysienska (Eds.), Theory, simulation, and experiment: Theory development, testing, and growth in group processes research (pp. 131-147). Westport, CT: Praeger.
39. Troyer, L., & Silver, S. D. (1996). Negative evaluation and innovativeness in group decision making: Insights for GDSS development from a social risk framework. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 1232-1237). Atlanta, GA: Decision Sciences Institute.
40. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organization Studies, 2, 419-427.
41. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
42. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43. Youngreen, R. (2006). Minority influence, status, and the generation of novel ideas. Doctoral dissertation. Iowa City: University of Iowa (Dissertation Abstracts International, 66/8, 3119A).