Procedural justice in majority-minority relations: Studies involving belgian linguistic groups

Social Justice Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 25-44

  Klein, Olivier ^a   Azzi, Assad E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Belgium; Group representation; Minority; Procedural justice; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344941437     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012571623641     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Azzi, A. E. (1992). Procedural justice and the allocation of power in intergroup relations: Studies in the United States and South Africa. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18: 736-747.
2. Azzi, A. E. (1993a). Group representation and procedural justice in multigroup decision-making bodies. Soc. Just. Res. 6: 195-218.
3. Azzi, A. E. (1993b). Implicit and category-based allocations of decision-making power in majorityminority relations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29: 203-228.
4. Azzi, A. (1998). From competitive interests, perceived injustice, and identity needs to collective action: Psychological mechanisms in ethnic nationalism. In Dandeker, C. (ed.), Nationalism and Violence, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 73-138.
5. Barreto, M. (2000). Identity and Strategy in Pro-Group Behavior, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
6. Bornstein, G., Crum, L., Wittenbraker, J., Harring, K., Insko, C., and Thibault, J. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 13: 321-350.
7. Brantwaithe, A., Doyle, S., andLightbown, N. (1979). The balance between fairness and discrimination. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 9: 149-163.
8. Brown, R. J., and Deschamps, J.-C. (1980). Discrimination entre individus et entre groupes [Discrimination between individuals and between groupsJ. Bull. Psychol. 34: 185-195.
9. Howell, D. (1997). Statistical Methods for Psychology, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
10. Klein, O. (2000). Une approche pragmatique de l'expression des stereotypes [A Pragmatic Perspective on the Expression of Stereotypes], Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.
11. Klein, O., and Azzi, A. (2001). How group members attempt to tailor an out-group's representation of themselves. Er. J. Soc. Psychol. 40: 279-294.
12. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Greenberg, M., and Willies, R. H. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27-55.
13. Licata, L. (2001). Represented identities and representations of identity: Effect of the comparative and sociopolitical context on the psychological meaning of geopolitical identities. Unpublished PhD, thesis. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.
14. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59: 952-959.
15. Lind, E. A., Lissak, E., and Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. J. Appt. Soc. Psychol. 13: 338-350.
16. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
17. Mabille, X. (1992). Historié Politique de la Belgique de 1830 ànos jours [Political History of Belgium From 1830 Until the Present], Centre de Recherche et d'Information Socio-Politique, Brussels.
18. Mann, L. (1986). Cross-cultural studies of rules for determining majority and minority decision rights. Aust. J. Psychol. 38:319-328.
19. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., and Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36:511-520.
20. Rawls, J. (1980). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Sherif, M. (1967). Group Conflict and Co-Operation, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
22. Simon, B., and Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 703-711.
23. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S., and Austin, W. G. (eds.), The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp. 7-24.
24. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., and Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 778-793.
25. Thibault, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
26. Tornblom, L. Y, Jonsson, D., and Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class, and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. Int. J. Intercutt. Ret. 9: 51-77.
27. Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on... "the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm." Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 13: 351-367.
28. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell, New York.
29. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52: 333-344.
30. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
31. Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 482-4197.
32. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A., and Spodick, N. (1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 48: 72-81.
33. Tyler, T. R., and Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In Gilbert, D. T., and Fiske, S. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., Vol. 2, Mcgraw-Hill, Boston, MA, pp. 595-629.
34. Van Dijk, E., and Wilke, H. (2000). Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keepsome, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78: 92-104.