The interplay between customer participation and difficulty of design examples in the online designing process and its effect on customer satisfaction: Mediational analyses

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 147-154

  Chang, Chia Chi ^a   Chen, Hui Yun ^a   Huang, I Chiang ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLOTHING; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD INDUSTRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PROCESS DESIGN; SATISFACTION; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLOTHING; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; SELF EFFICACY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 64749099628     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0170     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Dellaert BGC, Stremersch S. Marketing mass-customized products: striking a balance between utility and complexity. Journal of Marketing Research 2005; 42:219-27.
2. Kramer T. (2003) The effect of preference measurement on preference construction and responses to customized offers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
3. Schreier M. The value increment of mass-customized products: an empirical assessment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2006; 5:317-27.
4. Fiore AM, Lee S-E, Kunz G. Individual differences, motivations, and willingness to use a mass customization option for fashion products. European Journal of Marketing 2004; 38:835-49.
5. Kamali N, Loker S. Mass customization: online consumer involvement in product design. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2002; 7.
6. Franke N, Piller F. Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: the case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2004; 21:401-15.
7. Huffman C, Kahn BE. Variety for sale: mass customization or mass confusion? Journal of Retailing 1998; 74:491-513.
8. Sirgy MJ. Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research 1985; 13:195-206.
9. Hsieh A-T, Yen C-H, Chin K-C. Participative customers as partial employees and service provider workload. International Journal of Service Industry Management 2004; 15:187.
10. Bitner MJ, Faranda WT, Hubbert AR, et al. Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management 1997; 8:193.
11. Allen MW, Ng SH. The direct and indirect influences of human values on product ownership. Journal of Economic Psychology 1999; 20:5-39.
12. Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC. The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research 1982; 9:132-40.
13. Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping. Journal of Consumer Research 1994; 20:644-56.
14. Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB. Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing 1982; 46:92-101.
15. Van Raaij WF, Pruyn ATH. Customer control and evaluation of service validity and reliability. Psychology & Marketing 1998; 15:811.
16. Averill JR. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin 1973; 80:286-303.
17. Godek J, Yates JF, Yoon Y. Customization and personalization: the influence of perceived control and perceived capability on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research 2002; 29:157.
18. Lin H-F. Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2006; 9.
19. Tam KY, Ho SY. Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: an elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research 2005; 16:271.
20. Bendapudi N, Leone RP. Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing 2003; 67:14-28.
21. Stouffs R, Tunçer B, Sariyildiz S. (2002) Examples of Web-based custom design in Dutch residential developments. In Proceedings of International Conference of Distributing Knowledge in Building, International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, Aarhus School of Architecture.
22. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982; 37:122-47.
23. Johar JS, Sirgy MJ. Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising 1991; 20:23.
24. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review 1977; 84:191.
25. Ulrich PV, Anderson-Connell LJ, Wu W. Consumer co-design of apparel for mass customization. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management 2003; 7:398-412.
26. Perdue BC, Summers JO. Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 1986; 23:317-26.
27. Park C-W, Moon B-J. The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type. Psychology & Marketing 2003; 20:977.
28. Spreng RA, MacKenzie SB, Olshavsky RW. A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing 1996; 60:15.
29. Sirgy MJ, Dhruv G, Tamara FM, et al. Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Academy of Marketing Science Journal 1997; 25:229.
30. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1986; 51.
31. Namasivayam K. Action control, proxy control, and consumers' evaluations of the service exchange. Psychology & Marketing 2004; 21:463-80.
32. Yang CH. Online shopping behavior: the features and perspective of b2c development in Taiwan. Market Intelligence Center 2007.
33. Hofstede G, McCrae RR. Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research 2004; 38:52-88.