Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) interrupts signal transduction between the Kss1 MAPK and the Tec1 transcription factor to maintain pathway specificity

Eukaryotic Cell

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 606-616

  Shock, Teresa R ^a   Thompson, James ^b   Yates III, John R ^b   Madhani, Hiten D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; FUS3 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; HOG1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TEC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 64749088641     PISSN: 15359778     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00005-09     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bahn, Y. S. 2008. Master and commander in fungal pathogens: the twocomponent system and the HOG signaling pathway. Eukaryot. Cell 7:2017-2036.
2. Bao, M. Z., M. A. Schwartz, G. T. Cantin, J. R. Yates III, and H. D. Madhani. 2004. Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119:991-1000.
3. Bardwell, L. 2004. A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway. Peptides 25:1465-1476.
4. Bern, M., D. Goldberg, W. H. McDonald, and J. R. Yates III. 2004. Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20(Suppl. 1):i49-i54.
5. Bilsland, E., C. Molin, S. Swaminathan, A. Ramne, and P. Sunnerhagen. 2004. Rck1 and Rck2 MAPKAP kinases and the HOG pathway are required for oxidative stress resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1743-1756.
6. Bilsland-Marchesan, E., J. Arino, H. Saito, P. Sunnerhagen, and F. Posas. 2000. Rck2 kinase is a substrate for the osmotic stress-activated mitogenactivated protein kinase Hog1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3887-3895.
7. Breitkreutz, A., L. Boucher, and M. Tyers. 2001. MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation. Curr. Biol. 11:1266-1271.
8. Bruckner, S., T. Kohler, G. H. Braus, B. Heise, M. Bolte, and H. U. Mosch. 2004. Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development. Curr. Genet. 46:331-342.
9. Chen, R. E., and J. Thorner. 2007. Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1773:1311-1340.
10. Cherkasova, V. A., R. McCully, Y. Wang, A. Hinnebusch, and E. A. Elion. 2003. A novel functional link between MAP kinase cascades and the Ras/ cAMP pathway that regulates survival. Curr. Biol. 13:1220-1226.
11. Chou, S., L. Huang, and H. Liu. 2004. Fus3-regulated Tec1 degradation through SCF(Cdc4) determines MAPK signaling specificity during mating in yeast. Cell 119:981-990.
12. Chou, S., S. Lane, and H. Liu. 2006. Regulation of mating and filamentation genes by two distinct Ste12 complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:4794-4805.
13. Clotet, J., and F. Posas. 2007. Control of cell cycle in response to osmostress: lessons from yeast. Methods Enzymol. 428:63-76.
14. Cook, J. G., L. Bardwell, S. J. Kron, and J. Thorner. 1996. Two novel targets of the MAP kinase Kss1 are negative regulators of invasive growth in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 10:2831-2848.
15. Cook, J. G., L. Bardwell, and J. Thorner. 1997. Inhibitory and activating functions for MAPK Kss1 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae filamentousgrowth signalling pathway. Nature 390:85-88.
16. Cullen, P. J., W. Sabbagh, Jr., E. Graham, M. M. Irick, E. K. van Olden, C. Neal, J. Delrow, L. Bardwell, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 2004. A signaling mucin at the head of the Cdc42- and MAPK-dependent filamentous growth pathway in yeast. Genes Dev. 18:1695-1708.
17. Davenport, K. D., K. E. Williams, B. D. Ullmann, and M. C. Gustin. 1999. Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae filamentation/invasion pathway by osmotic stress in high-osmolarity glycogen pathway mutants. Genetics 153: 1091-1103.
18. Dohlman, H. G. 2002. G proteins and pheromone signaling. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64:129-152.
19. Elion, E. A. 2000. Pheromone response, mating, and cell biology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:573-581.
20. Eng, J., A. McCormack, and J. Yates. 1994. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5:976-989.
21. Ferrigno, P., F. Posas, D. Koepp, H. Saito, and P. A. Silver. 1998. Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin beta homologs NMD5 and XPO1. EMBO J. 17:5606-5614.
22. Gancedo, J. M. 2001. Control of pseudohyphae formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25:107-123.
23. Hao, N., Y. Zeng, T. C. Elston, and H. G. Dohlman. 2008. Control of MAPK specificity by feedback phosphorylation of shared adaptor protein ste50. J. Biol. Chem. 283:33798-33802.
24. Hohmann, S., M. Krantz, and B. Nordlander. 2007. Yeast osmoregulation. Methods Enzymol. 428:29-45.
25. Link, A. J., J. Eng, D. M. Schieltz, E. Carmack, G. J. Mize, D. R. Morris, B. M. Garvik, and J. R. Yates III. 1999. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:676-682.
26. MacCoss, M. J., C. C. Wu, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. Anal. Chem. 74:5593-5599.
27. Madhani, H. D., and G. R. Fink. 1997. Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275:1314-1317.
28. Madhani, H. D., and G. R. Fink. 1998. The control of filamentous differentiation and virulence in fungi. Trends Cell Biol. 8:348-353.
29. Madhani, H. D., T. Galitski, E. S. Lander, and G. R. Fink. 1999. Effectors of a developmental mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade revealed by expression signatures of signaling mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 12530-12535.
30. Madhani, H. D., C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1997. MAP kinases with distinct inhibitory functions impart signaling specificity during yeast differentiation. Cell 91:673-684.
31. Maeda, T., M. Takekawa, and H. Saito. 1995. Activation of yeast PBS2 MAPKK by MAPKKKs or by binding of an SH3-containing osmosensor. Science 269:554-558.
32. Marles, J. A., S. Dahesh, J. Haynes, B. J. Andrews, and A. R. Davidson. 2004. Protein-protein interaction affinity plays a crucial role in controlling the Sho1p-mediated signal transduction pathway in yeast. Mol. Cell 14:813-823.
33. Myers, L. C., and R. D. Kornberg. 2000. Mediator of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:729-749.
34. O'Rourke, S. M., and I. Herskowitz. 1998. The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 12:2874-2886.
35. O'Rourke, S. M., and I. Herskowitz. 2004. Unique and redundant roles for HOG MAPK pathway components as revealed by whole-genome expression analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:532-542.
36. O'Rourke, S. M., I. Herskowitz, and E. K. O'Shea. 2002. Yeast go the whole HOG for the hyperosmotic response. Trends Genet. 18:405-412.
37. Olson, K. A., C. Nelson, G. Tai, W. Hung, C. Yong, C. Astell, and I. Sadowski. 2000. Two regulators of Ste12p inhibit pheromone-responsive transcription by separate mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4199-4209.
38. Pan, X., T. Harashima, and J. Heitman. 2000. Signal transduction cascades regulating pseudohyphal differentiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:567-572.
39. Peng, J., J. E. Elias, C. C. Thoreen, L. J. Licklider, and S. P. Gygi. 2003. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2:43-50.
40. Posas, F., J. R. Chambers, J. A. Heyman, J. P. Hoeffler, E. de Nadal, and J. Arino. 2000. The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17249-17255.
41. Posas, F., and H. Saito. 1997. Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. Science 276:1702-1705.
42. Proft, M., and K. Struhl. 2004. MAP kinase-mediated stress relief that precedes and regulates the timing of transcriptional induction. Cell 118:351-361.
43. Ramezani-Rad, M. 2003. The role of adaptor protein Ste50-dependent regulation of the MAPKKK Ste11 in multiple signalling pathways of yeast. Curr. Genet. 43:161-170.
44. Reiser, V., H. Ruis, and G. Ammerer. 1999. Kinase activity-dependent nuclear export opposes stress-induced nuclear accumulation and retention of Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:1147-1161.
45. Rep., M., M. Krantz, J. M. Thevelein, and S. Hohmann. 2000. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J. Biol. Chem. 275:8290- 8300.
46. Sabbagh, W., Jr., L. J. Flatauer, A. J. Bardwell, and L. Bardwell. 2001. Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol. Cell 8:683-691.
47. Sadygov, R. G., J. Eng, E. Durr, A. Saraf, H. McDonald, M. J. MacCoss, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Code developments to improve the efficiency of automated MS/MS spectra interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 2:211-215.
48. Schwartz, M. A. 2005. Signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating and filamentous growth MAPK pathways. University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
49. Schwartz, M. A., and H. D. Madhani. 2006. Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5. Curr. Genet. 49:351-363.
50. Tatebayashi, K., K. Tanaka, H. Y. Yang, K. Yamamoto, Y. Matsushita, T. Tomida, M. Imai, and H. Saito. 2007. Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway. EMBO J. 26:3521-3533.
51. Tatebayashi, K., K. Yamamoto, K. Tanaka, T. Tomida, T. Maruoka, E. Kasukawa, and H. Saito. 2006. Adaptor functions of Cdc42, Ste50, and Sho1 in the yeast osmoregulatory HOG MAPK pathway. EMBO J. 25:3033-3044.
52. Tedford, K., S. Kim, D. Sa, K. Stevens, and M. Tyers. 1997. Regulation of the mating pheromone and invasive growth responses in yeast by two MAP kinase substrates. Curr. Biol. 7:228-238.
53. Teige, M., E. Scheikl, V. Reiser, H. Ruis, and G. Ammerer. 2001. Rck2, a member of the calmodulin-protein kinase family, links protein synthesis to high osmolarity MAP kinase signaling in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5625-5630.
54. Truckses, D. M., J. E. Bloomekatz, and J. Thorner. 2006. The RA domain of Ste50 adaptor protein is required for delivery of Ste11 to the plasma membrane in the filamentous growth signaling pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:912-928.
55. van de Peppel, J., N. Kettelarij, H. van Bakel, T. T. Kockelkorn, D. van Leenen, and F. C. Holstege. 2005. Mediator expression profiling epistasis reveals a signal transduction pathway with antagonistic submodules and highly specific downstream targets. Mol. Cell 19:511-522.
56. Washburn, M. P., D. Wolters, and J. R. Yates III. 2001. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:242-247.
57. Westfall, P. J., J. C. Patterson, R. E. Chen, and J. Thorner. 2008. Stress resistance and signal fidelity independent of nuclear MAPK function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:12212-12217.
58. Westfall, P. J., and J. Thorner. 2006. Analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling specificity in response to hyperosmotic stress: use of an analog-sensitive HOG1 allele. Eukaryot. Cell 5:1215-1228.
59. Wu, C., G. Jansen, J. Zhang, D. Y. Thomas, and M. Whiteway. 2006. Adaptor protein Ste50p links the Ste11p MEKK to the HOG pathway through plasma membrane association. Genes Dev. 20:734-746.
60. Zarrinpar, A., R. P. Bhattacharyya, M. P. Nittler, and W. A. Lim. 2004. Sho1 and Pbs2 act as coscaffolds linking components in the yeast high osmolarity MAP kinase pathway. Mol. Cell 14:825-832.
61. Zeitlinger, J., I. Simon, C. T. Harbison, N. M. Hannett, T. L. Volkert, G. R. Fink, and R. A. Young. 2003. Program-specific distribution of a transcription factor dependent on partner transcription factor and MAPK signaling. Cell 113:395-404.