A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra- and in-role performance

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 34, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 305-321

  Burney, Laurie L ^a   Henle, Christine A ^b   Widener, Sally K ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64149108926     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 2 (1965), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 267-299
2. Anderson S.W., and Widener S.K. Doing quantitative field research in management accounting. In: Chapman C.S., Hopwood A.G., and Shields M.D. (Eds). Handbook of management accounting research Vol. 1 (2007), Elsevier, Oxford
3. Arbuckle J.L., and Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 user's guide (1999), Small Waters Corporation, Chicago, IL
4. Baker G., Gibbons R., and Murphy K.J. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (1994) 1125-1156
5. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
6. Beer M., and Cannon M.D. Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management 43 (2004) 3-48
7. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 238-246
8. Bonner S.E., and Sprinkle G.B. The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance on theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002) 303-345
9. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA 136-162
10. Budde J. Performance measure congruity and the balanced scorecard. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (2007) 515-539
11. Burney L.L., and Widener S. Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information and managerial behavioral responses - Role stress and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 19 (2007) 43-69
12. Byrne B.M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
13. Casper J.D., Tyler T., and Fisher B. Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review 22 (1988) 483-508
14. Cohen-Charash Y., and Spector P.E. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (2001) 278-321
15. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice. A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 386-400
16. Colquitt J.A., Conlon D.E., Wesson M.J., Porter C.O.L.H., and Ng K.Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2001) 425-445
17. Cropanzano R., and Ambrose M. Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In: Greenberg J., and Cropanzano R. (Eds). Advances in Organizational Justice (2001), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
18. Cropanzano R., and Folger R. Procedural justice and worker motivation. In: Staw R.M., and Porter L.W. (Eds). Motivation and work behavior (1991), McGraw-Hill, New York 131-143
19. Cropanzano R., and Greenberg J. Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In: Cooper C., and Robertson I. (Eds). International review of industrial and organizational psychology (1997), Wiley, New York 317-372
20. Deutsch M. Experimental studies of the effects of different systems of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues 31 (1975) 137-139
21. Erdogan B. Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review 12 (2002) 555-578
22. Farrell A.M., Luft J., and Shields M.D. Accuracy in judging the nonlinear effects of cost and profit drivers. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (2007) 1139
23. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2000). Theories of fairness and reciprocity - Evidence and economic applications. CESifo Working Paper Series.
24. Fehr, E., Klein, A., & Schmidt, K. M. (2001). Fairness, incentives and contractual incompleteness. CESifo Working Paper.
25. Feltham G., and Xie J. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review 69 (1994) 429-453
26. Folger R., Konovsky M.A., and Cropanzaon R. A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior 14 (1992) 129-177
27. Frigo M.L., and Litman J. Strategy, business execution, and performance measures. Strategic Finance 83 (2002) 8
28. Gibbs M., Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W.A., and Vargus M.E. Determinants and effects of subjectivity in incentives. The Accounting Review 79 (2004) 409-436
29. Gilliland S.W., and Langdon J.C. Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness. In: Smith M. (Ed). Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (1998), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA
30. Giraud F., Langevin P., and Mendoza C. Justice as a rationale for the controllability principle: A study of managers' opinion. Management Accounting Research 19 (2008) 32-44
31. Greenberg J. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (1986) 340-342
32. Hendricks K., Menor L., and Wiedman C. The balanced scorecard: To adopt or not to adopt?. Ivey Business Journal November/December (2004) 1-7
33. Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1979) 74-91
34. Ittner C.D., and Larcker D.F. Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1998) 205-238
35. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., and Meyer M.W. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 78 (2003) 725-758
36. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F., and Randall T. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 715-741
37. Ittner C.D., and Larker D.F. Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review November (2003) 88-95
38. Jenkins Jr. G.D., Gupta N., Mitra A., and Shaw J.D. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998) 777-787
39. Johnson E.N., Lowe D.J., and Reckers P.M.J. Alternative work arrangements and perceived career success: Current evidence from the big four firms in the US. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 48-72
40. Johnson R.E., Selenta C., and Lord R.G. When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99 (2006) 175-201
41. Joreskog K.G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 34 (1969) 183-202
42. Kachelmeier S.J., and Towry K.L. Negotiated transfer pricing: Is fairness easier said than done?. The Accounting Review 77 (2002) 571-593
43. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., and Thaler R.H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business 59 (1986) S285-S300
44. Kaplan R.S., and Atkinson A.A. Advanced management accounting. 3rd ed. (1998), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
45. Kaplan R.S., and Norton D.P. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action (1996), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
46. Kenny, D. A. (2006). Mediation. .
47. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (1998), Guilford Press, New York
48. Krishnan R., Luft J.L., and Shields M.D. Effects of accounting-method choices on subjective performance-measure weighting decisions: Experimental evidence on precision and error covariance. The Accounting Review 80 (2005) 1163-1192
49. Landis J.M., and Goodstein L. When is justice fair?. American Bar Foundation Research Journal (1986) 675-708
50. Lau C.M., and Lim E.W. The intervening effects of participation on the relationship between procedural justice and managerial performance. British Accounting Review 34 (2002) 55-78
51. Lau C.M., and Sholihin M. Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?. The British Accounting Review 37 (2005) 389-413
52. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K., Greenberg M., and Willis R. (Eds). Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (1980), Plenum Press, New York 27-55
53. Levy P.E., and Williams J.R. The role of perceived system knowledge in predicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19 (1998) 53-65
54. Libby T. The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative budgeting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (1999) 125-137
55. Libby T. Referent cognitions and budgetary fairness: A research note. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (2001) 91-105
56. Lind E.A., and Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice (1988), Plenum Press, New York
57. Lindquist T.M. Fairness as an antecedent to participative budgeting: Examining the effects of distributive justice, procedural justice and referent cognitions on satisfaction and performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 7 (1995) 122-147
58. Locke E.A., and Latham G.P. A theory of goal setting and task performance (1990), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ
59. Luft J., and Shields M.D. Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 169-249
60. Malina M.A., Norrekilt H.A.O., and Selto F.H. Relations among measures, climates of control, and performance measurement models. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (2007) 935-982
61. McGowan A.S. Perceived benefits of ABCM implementation. Accounting Horizons 12 (1998) 31-50
62. Moers F. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: The impact of diversity and subjectivity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (2005) 67-80
63. Organ D.W. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In: Cummings L.L., and Staw B.M. (Eds). Research in organizational behavior Vol. 12 (1990), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 43-72
64. Otley D. Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research 10 (1999) 363-382
65. Parker R.J., and Kohlmeyer III J.M. Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30 (2005) 357-369
66. Podsakoff P.M., Ahearne M., and MacKenzie S.B. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997) 262-270
67. Podsakoff P.M., and MacKenzie S.B. Organizational citizenship behavior and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (1994) 351-363
68. Podsakoff P.M., and MacKenzie S.B. Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance 10 (1997) 133-151
69. Podsakoff P.M., and Organ D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (1986) 531-543
70. Preacher K.J., and Hayes A.F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36 4 (2004) 717-731
71. Prendergast C., and Topel R. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation. European Economic Review 37 (1993) 355-365
72. Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review December (1993) 1281-1302
73. Rajan M.V., and Reichelstein S. Subjective performance indicators and discretionary bonus pools. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2006) 585-618
74. Robbins S.A. Organizational behavior. 10th ed. (2003), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
75. Schiemann W.A., and Lingle J.H. Seven greatest myths of measurement. Management Review 86 (1997) 29-32
76. Simons T., and Roberson Q. Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 432-443
77. Sprinkle G.B. Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 287-318
78. Stoffey R.W., and Reilly R.R. Training appraisees to participate in appraisal: Effects on appraisers and appraisees. Journal of Business and Psychology 12 (1997) 219-239
79. Taylor M.S., Masterson S.S., Renard M.K., and Tracy K.B. Managers' reactions to procedurally just performance management systems. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1998) 568-579
80. Taylor M.S., Tracy K.B., Renard M.K., Harrison J.K., and Carroll S.J. Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 495-523
81. Thibaut J., and Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis (1975), Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
82. Tyler T.R. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 850-863
83. Vera-Munoz S.C., Shackell M., and Buehnr M. Accountants' usage of causal business models in the presence of benchmark data. A note. Contemporary Accounting Research (2007) 24
84. Webb R.A. Managers' commitment to the goals contained in a strategic performance measurement system. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (2004) 925-958
85. Wentzel K. The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers' performance in a budget setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 14 (2002) 247-271
86. Wheaton B., Muthen B., Alwin D.F., and Summers G.F. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In: Heise D.R. (Ed). Sociology methodology (1977), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
87. Whyte G., Bytheway A., and Edwards C. Understanding user perception of information systems success. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 6 (1997) 35-67
88. Williams L.J., and Anderson S.E. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 601-617