Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard

Accounting Review

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 725-758

  Ittner, Christopher D ^a   Larcker, David F ^a   Meyer, Marshall W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced scorecard; Nonfinancial performance measurement; Subjective performance measures

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042074498     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.725     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baiman, S., and M. V. Rajan. 1995. The informational advantages of discretionary bonus schemes. The Accounting Review 70 (4): 557-579.
2. Baker, G., R. Gibbons, and K. J. Murphy. 1994. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 1125-1156.
3. Banker, R. D., and S. M. Datar. 1989. Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (1): 21-39.
4. Banker, R., G. Potter, and D. Srinivasan. 2000. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that included nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (1): 65-92.
5. Baron, J., and J. Hershey. 1988. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (4): 569-579.
6. Bellows, R. M. 1954. Psychology of Personnel in Business and Industry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Bommer, W. H., J. L. Johnson, G. A. Rich, P. M. Podsakoff, and S. B. MacKenzie. 1995. On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 48 (3): 587-605.
8. Blum, M. L., and J. C. Naylor. 1968. Industrial Psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
9. Bushman, R., R. Indjejikian, and A. Smith. 1996. CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (2): 161-193.
10. Campbell, D., S. Datar, S. Kulp, and V. G. Narayanan. 2002. Using the balanced scorecard as a control system for monitoring and revising corporate strategy. Working paper, Harvard University.
11. Campbell, J. P. 1990. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, 2nd edition, edited by M. D. Dunnette, and L. M. Hough, 687-732. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Datar, S., S. Kulp, and R. Lambert. 2001. Balancing performance measures. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1): 75-92.
13. Feldman, J. M. 1981. Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (1): 127-148.
14. Feltham, G., and J. Xie. 1994. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review 69 (3): 429-453.
15. Frederickson, J. R., S. A. Pfeffer, and J. Pratt. 1999. Performance evaluation judgments: Effects of prior experience under different performance evaluation schemes and feedback frequencies. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 151-165
16. Ghosh, D., and R. F. Lusch. 2000. Outcome effect, controllability and performance evaluation of managers: Some field evidence from multi-outlet businesses. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (4-5): 411-425.
17. Gibbs, M., K. Merchant, W. Van der Stede, and M. Vargus. 2002. Causes and effects of subjectivity in incentives. Working paper, University of Chicago and University of Southern California.
18. Gjesdal, F. 1981. Accounting for stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research 19 (2): 208-231.
19. Hauser, J. R., D. I. Siemester, and B. Wernerfeit. 1994. Customer satisfaction incentives. Marketing Science 13 (3): 327-350.
20. Hawkins, S. A., and R. Hastie. 1990. Hindsight: Biased judgment of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin 107 (3): 311-327.
21. Hemmer, T. 1996. On the design and choice of "modern" management accounting measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8 (1): 87-116.
22. Heneman, R. L. 1986. The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 39 (4): 811-826.
23. _, M. L. Moore, and K. N. Wexley. 1987. Performance-rating accuracy: A critical review. Journal of Business Research 15 (5): 431-448.
24. Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74-91.
25. _, and P. Milgrom. 1991. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1 (1): 24-52.
26. Hopwood, A. G. 1974. Leadership climate and the use of accounting data in performance evaluation. The Accounting Review 49 (1): 485-495.
27. Ittner, C., D. Larcker, and M. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 231-255.
28. -, and _. 2002. Determinants of performance measure choices in worker incentive plans. Journal of Labor Economics 20 (2): S58-S90.
29. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30. _, and _. 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31. Lambert, R. 2001. Contracting theory and accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (1-3): 3-87.
32. Lipe, M. G. 1993. Analyzing the variance investigation decision: The effects of outcomes, mental accounting, and framing. The Accounting Review 68 (4): 748-764.
33. _, and S. Salterio. 2000. The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (3): 283-298.
34. _, and _. 2002. A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (6): 531-540.
35. Luft, J. and M. Shields. 2001. The effects of financial and nonfinancial performance measures on judgment and decision performance. Working paper, Michigan State University.
36. MacLeod, W. B. 2001. On optimal contracting with subjective evaluation. Working paper, University of Southern California.
37. Malina, M. A., and F. H. Selto. 2001 Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13 (1): 47-90.
38. Merchant, K. A. 1989. Rewarding Results: Motivating Profit Center Managers. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Mitchell, T., and L. Kalb. 1981. Effects of outcome knowledge and outcome valence on supervisors' evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (4): 604-612.
40. Murphy, K., and P. Oyer. 2001. Discretion in executive incentive contracts: Theory and evidence. Working paper, University of Southern California and Stanford University.
41. Prendergast, C., and R. Topel. 1993. Discretion and bias in performance evaluation. European Economic Review 37 (2-3): 355-365.
42. _, and _. 1996. Favoritism in organizations. Journal of Political Economy 104 (5): 958-978.
43. Schiff, A. D., and L. R. Hoffman. 1996. An exploration of the use of financial and nonfinancial measures of performance by executives in a service firm. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8 (1): 134-151.
44. Slovic, P., and B. Fischhoff. 1977. On the psychology of experimental surprises. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perceptions and Performance 3 (4): 544-551.