Managers' reactions to procedurally just performance management systems

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 568-579

  Taylor, M Susan ^a   Masterson, Suzanne S ^b   Renard, Monika K ^b   Tracy, Kay B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220447     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/256943     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Crosby, F., Burris, L., Censor, C., & MacKethan, E. R. 1986. Two rotten apples spoil the justice barrel. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations: 267-281. New York: Plenum.
2. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. 1998. Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 115-130.
4. Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. 1992. A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 13: 129-177. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Gilliland, S. W. 1993. The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18: 694-734.
6. Gilliland, S. W. 1994. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 691-701.
7. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. 1980. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction: 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
9. Lissak, R. I., & Sheppard, B. H. 1983. Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13: 45-65.
10. Longenecker, C. O., Gioia, D. A., & Sims, H. P. 1987. Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1: 183-193.
11. Napier, N. K., & Latham, G. P. 1986. Outcome expectancies of people who conduct performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 39: 827-837.
12. Taylor, M. S., & Olivo, N. N. 1990. Creating more effective feedback environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.
13. Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. 1995. Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 495-523.
14. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1982. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: 163-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Tyler, T. R. 1989. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 830-838.
16. Tyler, T. R. 1990. Using procedures to justify outcomes: Managing conflict and allocating resources in work organizations. Dispute Resolution Research Center working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
17. Ury, W. L., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. 1989. Getting disputes resolved. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Valley, K. L. 1989. Rank and relationship effects on procedural choice in conflict management. Dispute Resolution Research Center working paper, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
19. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. 1997. Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 247-252.