Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 3496-3501

  Gonzalez, Claudia L R ^a   Ganel, Tzvi ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAND GRIP; HANDEDNESS; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RETINA IMAGE; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

BRAIN; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33744935004     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01187.2005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aglioti S, DeSouza JF, and Goodale MA. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5: 679-685, 1995.
2. Bertelson P and Morais J. A Ponzo-like illusion left and right of fixation: a failed prediction. Neuropsychologia 21: 105-109, 1983.
3. Bryden MP. Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
4. Crawford JD, Medendorp WP, and Marotta JJ. Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 92: 10-19, 2004.
5. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JF, Gati JS, Menon RS, and Goodale MA. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153: 180-189, 2003.
6. Dewar MT and Carey DP. Visuomotor "immunity" to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation. Neuropsychologia In press.
7. Fisk JD and Goodale MA. The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Exp Brain Res 72: 425-435, 1988.
8. Franz VH. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5: 457-459, 2001.
9. Franz VH, Bulthoff HH, and Fahle M. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation. Exp Brain Res 149: 470-477, 2003.
10. Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bulthoff HH, and Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11: 20-25, 2000.
11. Frey SH, Funnell MG, Gerry VE, and Gazzaniga MS. A dissociation between the representation of tool-use skills and hand dominance: insights from left- and right-handed callosotomy patients. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 262-272, 2005.
12. Gazzaniga MS. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain 123: 1293-1326, 2000.
13. Gentilucci M and Gangitano M. Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. Eur J Neurosci 10: 752-756, 1998.
14. Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, and Dixon P. Grasping the meaning of words. Exp Brain Res 154: 103-108, 2004.
15. Gonzalez C, Ganel T, Whitwell RL, Morrissey B, and Goodale MA. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand (Abstract). Vis Sci Soc Abstr 504, 2006.
16. Goodale MA and Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
17. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, and Carey DP. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349: 154-156, 1991.
18. Grabowska A, Nowicka A, and Szymanska O. Sex related effect of unilateral brain lesions on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Cortex 35: 231-241, 1999.
19. Grabowska A, Szymanska O, Nowicka A, and Kwiecein M. The effect of unilateral brain lesions on perception of visual illusions. Behav Brain Res 47: 191-197, 1992.
20. Haffenden AM and Goodale MA. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 122-136, 1998.
21. Haffenden AM, Schiff KC, and Goodale MA. The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp. Curr Biol 11: 177-181, 2001.
22. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, and Goodale MA. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain 126: 2463-2475, 2003.
23. Jeannerod M, Decety J, and Michel F. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia 32: 369-380, 1994.
24. Kimura D. Neuromotor Mechanisms in Human Communication. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1993.
25. Koski L, Iacoboni M, and Mazziotta JC. Deconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 15: 71-77, 2002.
26. Kroliczak G, Heard P, Goodale MA, and Gregory RL. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23: 9-16, 2005.
27. Marchetti C and Della Sala S. On crossed apraxia. Description of a right-handed apraxic patient with right supplementary motor area damage. Cortex 33: 341-354, 1997.
28. Marotta JJ, Behrmann M, and Goodale MA. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia. Exp Brain Res 116: 113-121, 1997.
29. Marotta JJ, DeSouza JF, Haffenden AM, and Goodale MA. Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? Neuropsychologia 36: 491-497, 1998.
30. Meador KJ, Loring DW, Lee K, Hughes M, Lee G, Nichols M, and Heilman KM. Cerebral lateralization: relationship of language and ideomotor praxis. J Neurol Methods 53: 2028-2031, 1999.
31. Milner AD and Goodale MA. Visual pathways to perception and action. Prog Brain Res 95: 317-337, 1993.
32. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
33. Pavani F, Boscagli I, Benvenuti F, Rabuffetti M, and Farne A. Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Exp Brain Res 127: 95-101, 1999.
34. Perenin MT and Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111: 643-674, 1988.
35. Radoeva PD, Cohen JD, Corballis PM, Lukovits TG, and Koleva SG. Hemispheric asymmetry in a dissociation between the visuomotor and visuoperceptual streams. Neuropsychologia 43: 1763-1773, 2005.
36. Raymer AM, Merians AS, Adair JC, Schwartz RL, Williamson DJ, Rothi LJ, Poizner H, and Heilman KM. Crossed apraxia: implications for handedness. Cortex 35: 183-199, 1999.
37. Shmuelof L and Zohary E. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 47: 457-470, 2005.
38. Tunik E, Frey SH, and Grafton ST. Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8: 505-511, 2005.