State tomography of a chain of qubits embedded in a spin field-effect transistor via repeated spin-blockade measurements on the edge qubit

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Yuasa, Kazuya ^a   Okano, Kosuke ^b   Nakazato, Hiromichi ^b   Kashiwada, Saori ^c   Yoh, Kanji ^c  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62549115383     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075318     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120
2. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998). 10.1038/30156
3. T. Fujisawa, D. G. Austing, Y. Tokura, Y. Hirayama, and S. Tarucha, Nature (London) 419, 278 (2002) 10.1038/nature00976
4. J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Science 309, 2180 (2005) 10.1126/science.1116955
5. F. H. L. Koppens, C. Buizert, K. J. Tielrooij, I. T. Vink, K. C. Nowack, T. Meunier, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Nature (London) 442, 766 (2006). 10.1038/nature05065
6. R. Hanson, L. P. Kouwenhoven, J. R. Petta, S. Tarucha, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007). 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.1217
7. K. Yoh, K. Yuasa, and H. Nakazato, Physica E 29, 674 (2005). 10.1016/j.physe.2005.06.052
8. S. Kashiwada, T. Matsuda, and K. Yoh, J. Cryst. Growth 301-302, 785 (2007). 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.174
9. D. P. DiVincenzo, Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771 (2000). 10.1002/1521- 3978(200009)48:9/11<771::AID-PROP771>3.0.CO;2-E
10. H. Nakazato, M. Unoki, and K. Yuasa, Phys. Rev. A 70, 012303 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012303
11. Quantum State Estimation, edited by, M. G. A. Paris, and, J. Aeháček, (Springer, Berlin, 2004).
12. P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, T. C. Ralph, J. P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135 (2007), and references therein. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.135
13. A. I. Lvovsky and M. G. Raymer, arXiv:quant-ph/0511044 (unpublished), and references therein.
14. H. Häffner, W. Hänsel, C. F. Roos, J. Benhelm, D. Chek-al-kar, M. Chwalla, T. Körber, U. D. Rapol, M. Riebe, P. O. Schmidt, C. Becher, O. Gühne, W. Dür, and R. Blatt, Nature (London) 438, 643 (2005). 10.1038/nature04279
15. I. L. Chuang, N. Gershenfeld, M. G. Kubinec, and D. W. Leung, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 447 (1998). 10.1098/rspa.1998.0170
16. F. Jelezko, T. Gaebel, I. Popa, M. Domhan, A. Gruber, and J. Wrachtrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 130501 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.130501
17. N. Katz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, R. McDermott, M. Neeley, M. Steffen, E. M. Weig, A. N. Cleland, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Korotkov, Science 312, 1498 (2006). 10.1126/science.1126475
18. Y. Wu, X. Li, L. M. Duan, D. G. Steel, and D. Gammon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 087402 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.087402
19. M. Mehring, W. Scherer, and A. Weidinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206603 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.206603
20. J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, J. S. Greidanus, L. H. Willems van Beveren, S. De Franceschi, L. M. K. Vandersypen, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. B 67, 161308 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.161308
21. T. Nakaoka, T. Saito, J. Tatebayashi, and Y. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. B 70, 235337 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235337
22. H. Ohno, K. Yoh, K. Sueoka, K. Mukasa, A. Kawaharazuka, and M. E. Ramsteiner, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 42, L87 (2003) 10.1143/JJAP.42.L87
23. M. Ferhat and K. Yoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 112501 (2007). 10.1063/1.2713784
24. W. Langbein, P. Borri, U. Woggon, V. Stavarache, D. Reuter, and A. D. Wieck, Phys. Rev. B 70, 033301 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.033301
25. Roughly speaking, the increase in the channel current with the || component in Eq. 4.1 projects X onto | X | while that with || onto | X |, with these two cases summed up classically in accordance with the classical mixture in Eq. 4.1. A more rigorous derivation of Eq. 4.2 would be possible by formulating the spin-blockade measurement process as a projection on the state of the "current" degree of freedom and not on the spin degree of freedom of the channel electron. See, for instance, K. Koshino and A. Shimizu, Phys. Rep. 412, 191 (2005). 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.03.001
26. L. Jacak, J. Krasnyj, W. Jacak, R. Gonczarek, and P. Machnikowski, Phys. Rev. B 72, 245309 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.245309
27. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, in Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed., edited by, A. Jeffrey, and, D. Zwillinger, (Academic, Orlando, 2007).