Coherent state evolution in a superconducting qubit from partial-collapse measurement

Science

Volumn 312, Issue 5779, 2006, Pages 1498-1500

  Katz, N ^a   Ansmann, M ^a   Bialczak, Radoslaw C ^a   Lucero, Erik ^a   McDermott, R ^a   Neeley, Matthew ^a   Steffen, Matthias ^a   Weig, E M ^a   Cleland, A N ^a   Martinis, John M ^a   Korotkov, A N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California Riverside   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; QUANTUM THEORY; TOMOGRAPHY;

COHERENT STATE EVOLUTION; NONUNITARY EVOLUTION; PARTIAL-COLLAPSE MEASUREMENT; SUPERCONDUCTING QUBIT;

SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

ALGORITHM; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; WAVE;

ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SUPERCONDUCTOR; WAVEFORM;

EID: 33744969803     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1126475     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. M. Schlosshauer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1267 (2004).
2. J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 580 (1992).
3. J. M. Geremia, J. K. Stockton, H. Mabuchi, Science 304, 270 (2004).
4. C. Ahn, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A 67, 052310 (2003).
5. Y. Nakamura, Y. A. Pashkin, J. S. Tsai, Nature 398, 786 (1999).
6. D. Vion et al., Science 296, 886 (2002).
7. J. M. Martinis, S. Nam, J. Aumentado, C. Urbina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002).
8. I. Chiorescu, Y. Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans, J. Mooij, Science 299, 1869 (2003).
9. J. Q. You, F. Nori, Phys. Today 58, 42 (2005).
10. J. M. Martinis, M. H. Devoret, J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985).
11. J. R. Friedman, V. Patel, W. Chen, S. K. Tolpygo, J. E. Lukens, Nature 406, 43 (2000).
12. M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
13. A. Wallraff et al., Nature 431, 162 (2004).
14. I. Chiorescu et al., Nature 431, 159 (2004).
15. W. D. Oliver et al., Science 310, 1653 (2005).
16. K. B. Cooper et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180401 (2004).
17. P. Bertet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257002 (2005).
18. J. M. Martinis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210503 (2005).
19. A. N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 63, 115403 (2001).
20. A. Wallraff et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 060501 (2005).
21. A. Lupascu, E. F. C. Driessen, L. Roschier, C. J. P. M. Harmans, J. E. Mooij, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127003 (2006).
22. R. McDermott et al., Science 307, 1299 (2005).
23. M. Steffen et al., Cond. Mater., in press; preprint (http://arxiv.org/ abs/cond-mat/0602432).
24. G. M. D'Ariano, M. G. A. Paris, M. F. Sacchi, Adv. Imaging Electron Phys. 128, 205 (2003).
25. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
26. The quantum-state tomography shown here can be implemented in different ways. Typically, only three high-precision measurements are needed for a single qubit. For multiple qubit-state tomography, of course, such a simplified scheme becomes mandatory. However, the full two-dimensional scan allows us to resolve the rotation angle with high precision, determine the visibility shown in Fig. 3C, easily avoid any calibration errors in the microwave frequency, and fully test for proper state rotations.
27. P. W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995).
28. We acknowledge S. Waltman and the National Institute for Standards and Technology for support in building the microwave electronics. Devices were made at the University of California at Santa Barbara and Cornell Nanofabrication Facilities, a part of the NSF-funded National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. N.K. acknowledges support of the Rothschild fellowship. This work was supported by Advanced Research and Development Activity under grant W911NF-04-1-0204 and NSF under grant CCF-0507227.