Conservative Femoral Stem Revision. Avoiding Therapeutic Escalation

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 365-373

  Pinaroli, Alban ^a   Lavoie, Frédéric ^b   Cartillier, Jean Claude ^c   Neyret, Philippe ^a   Selmi, Tarik Ait Si ^a  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c Clinique Eugène André   (France)

Author keywords

bone loss; femoral stem revision; hydroxyapatite coating; metaphyseal fixation; primary intention stem; revision hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 62349132851     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Clohisy J.C., Calvert G., Tull F., et al. Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004)
2. Della Valle C.J., and Paprosky W.G. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
3. Valle C.J., and Paprosky W.G. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A Suppl 4 (2003)
4. Kurtz S., Mowat F., Ong K., et al. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 7
5. Mulliken B.D., Rorabeck C.H., and Bourne R.B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4- to 6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325 (1996)
6. Crowe J.F., Sculco T.P., and Kahn B. Revision total hip arthroplasty: hospital cost and reimbursement analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 413 (2003)
7. de Thomasson E., Williams J.B., Marmorat J.L., et al. Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery: does distal fixation of the stem affect allograft transformation?. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 4
8. Kim Y.H., and Kim J.S. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 4
9. Marmorat J.L., Leymarie J.B., Piriou P., et al. Femoral revision using cemented stem and compacted bone graft: femoral migration analysis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92 (2006) 2
10. Bohm P., and Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
11. Berry D.J. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty 17 4 Suppl 1 (2002)
12. Crawford C.H., Malkani A.L., Incavo S.J., et al. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 1
13. Engh Jr. C.A., Ellis T.J., Koralewicz L.M., et al. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 8
14. McAuley J.P., and Engh Jr. C.A. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004)
15. Moreland J.R., and Moreno M.A. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393 (2001)
16. Raman R., Kamath R.P., Parikh A., et al. Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 8
17. Sporer S.M., and Paprosky W.G. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 (2003)
18. Trikha S.P., Singh S., Raynham O.W., et al. Hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral stems in revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 8
19. Reikeras O., and Gunderson R.B. Excellent results with femoral revision surgery using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem: 59 patients followed for 10-16 years. Acta Orthop 77 (2006) 1
20. Busch C.A., Charles M.N., Haydon C.M., et al. Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 10
21. Sotereanos N., Sewecke J., Raukar G.J., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom cementless stem with distal cross-locking screws. Early results in femora with large proximal segmental deficiencies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 (2006) 5
22. Sinha R.K., Kim S.Y., and Rubash H.E. Long-stem cemented calcar replacement arthroplasty for proximal femoral bone loss. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 2
23. Incavo S.J., Mihalich R.M., and Coughlin K.M. A stem-allograft composite for femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 8
24. Lind M., Krarup N., Mikkelsen S., et al. Exchange impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty: results in 87 cases after 3.6 years' follow-up. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 2
25. Mahoney C.R., Fehringer E.V., Kopjar B., et al. Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432 (2005)
26. Morgan H.D., McCallister W., Cho M.S., et al. Impaction allografting for femoral component revision: clinical update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
27. Petit R. Hydroxyapatite and revision of femoral hip prostheses. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 9 (1999) 2
28. Havelin L.I., Espehaug B., Vollset S.E., et al. Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. A review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 (1995) 1
29. Reikeras O., and Gunderson R.B. Excellent results of HA coating on a grit-blasted stem: 245 patients followed for 8-12 years. Acta Orthop Scand 74 (2003) 2
30. Rokkum M., and Reigstad A. Total hip replacement with an entirely hydroxyapatite-coated prosthesis: 5 years' follow-up of 94 consecutive hips. J Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 6
31. Froimson M.I., Garino J., Machenaud A., et al. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplasty 22 (2007) 1
32. Vidalain J.P. HA coating. Ten-year experience with the CORAIL system in primary THA. The Artro Group. Acta Orthop Belg 63 Suppl 1 (1997)
33. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 (1969) 4
34. Engh C.A., Massin P., and Suthers K.E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257 (1990)
35. Higuera C.A., Hanna G., Florjancik K., et al. The use of proximal fixed modular stems in revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 4 Suppl 1 (2006)
36. Whiteside L.A. Major femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty treated with tapered, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004)
37. Kelly S.J., Incavo S.J., and Beynnon B. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 1
38. Nadaud M.C., Griffin W.L., Fehring T.K., et al. Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 6
39. Hirakawa K., Jacobs J.J., Urban R., et al. Mechanisms of failure of total hip replacements: lessons learned from retrieval studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
40. Langlais F. Can we improve the results of revision arthroplasty for infected total hip replacement?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 (2003) 5
41. Lecuire F., Collodel M., Basso M., et al. Revision of infected total hip prostheses by ablation reimplantation of an uncemented prosthesis. 57 case reports. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 85 (1999) 4
42. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., and Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18 3 Suppl 1 (2003)
43. Issack P.S., Guerin J., Butler A., et al. Intraoperative complications of revision hip arthroplasty using a porous-coated, distally slotted, fluted femoral stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425 (2004)
44. Niinimaki T., Junila J., and Jalovaara P. A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25 (2001) 2
45. Grigoris P., Roberts P., Panousis K., et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220 (2006) 2
46. Jones R.E. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
47. Murphy S.B., and Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty 19 4 Suppl 1 (2004)
48. Cameron H.U. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 4 Suppl 1 (2002)
49. Burstein G., Yoon P., and Saleh K.J. Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 (2004)
50. Malkani A.L., Lewallen D.G., Cabanela M.E., et al. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 4
51. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Ilstrup D., et al. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 319 (1995)
52. Woolson S.T., and Delaney T.J. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10 Suppl (1995)
53. Paprosky W.G., Greidanus N.V., and Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369 (1999)
54. Lawrence J.M., Engh C.A., and Macalino G.E. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am 24 (1993) 4