The Use of Proximal Fixed Modular Stems in Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 21, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2006, Pages 112-116

  Higuera, Carlos A ^a   Hanna, George ^b   Florjancik, Karen ^a   Allan, D Gordon ^c   Robinson, Raymond ^d   Barsoum, Wael K ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

proximal fixed modular stems; revision total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROXIMAL FIXED MODULAR FEMORAL STEM; SAFETY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33744997858     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Crawford S.A., Siney P.D., and Wroblewski B.M. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82 (2000) 684
2. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THA. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 134
3. Schuh A., Werber S., et al. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124 (2004) 306
4. Christie M.J., DeBoer D.K., et al. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 840
5. Cameron H.U. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 Suppl 1 (2002) 138
6. Cook S.D., Barrack R.L., and Clemow A.J. Corrosion and wear at the modular interface of uncemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 (1994) 68
7. Bobyn J.D., Tanzer M., et al. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 298 (1994) 27
8. Lombardi Jr. A.V., Mallory T.H., et al. Stem modularity: rarely necessary in primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25 (2002) 1385
9. Cameron H.U. Orthopaedic crossfire-stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 18 3 Suppl 1 (2003) 101
10. Jones R.E. Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 420 (2004) 142