Major femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty treated with tapered, porous-coated stems

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 429, Issue , 2004, Pages 222-226

  Whiteside, Leo A ^a  

^a Missouri Bone and Joint Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; BONE ATROPHY; BONE PAIN; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 9644273833     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150129.65400.78     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bohm P, Bischel O: Cement-free diaphyseal fixation principle for hip shaft exchange in large bone defects: Analysis of 12 years experience with the Wagner revision shaft. (article in German). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:229-239, 2001.
2. Bragdon CR, Burke D, Lowenstein JD, et al: Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amount of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 11:945-951, 1996.
3. Bugbee WD, Culpepper II WJ, Engh Jr CA, Engh Sr CA: Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 79:1007-1012, 1997.
4. Crowninshield RD, Johnston RC, Andrews JG, et al: A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. J Biomech 11:75-85, 1978.
5. Engh Jr CA, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, et al: Extensively porouscoated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss. J Arthroplasty 17:955-960, 2002.
6. Engh CA, Glassman AH, Griffin WL, Mayer JG: Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 235:91-110, 1988.
7. Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R: The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 25:63-64, 2001.
8. Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG: 5- to 13-year followup study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839-847, 1997.
9. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR: Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 76:965-973, 1994.
10. McLaughlin JR, Harris WH: Revision of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty with the calcar-replacement femoral component: Results after a mean of 10.8 years postoperatively. J Bone Joint Surg 78:331-339, 1996.
11. Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE, et al: Reaming technique of the femoral diaphysis in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 311:210-221, 1995.
12. Retpen JB, Varmarken JE, Rock ND, Jensen JS: Unsatisfactory results after repeated revision of hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 63:120-127, 1992.
13. Sugiyama H, Whiteside LA, Engh CA, Otani T: Late mechanical stability of the proximal coated AML prosthesis. Orthopedics 17:583-588, 1994.
14. Wagner H, Wagner M: Cone prosthesis for the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:88-95, 2000.
15. Warren PJ, Thompson P, Fletcher MD: Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:557-560, 2002.
16. Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS: Fixation of the Quatroloc femoral component. Clin Orthop 393:147-156, 2001.
17. Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS: Effect of neck retention on torsional fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 24:766-770, 1995.
18. Zweymuller KA, Lintner FK, Semlitsch MF: Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop 235:195-206, 1988.