Different time courses of Stroop and Garner effects in perception - An Event-Related Potentials Study

NeuroImage

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1272-1288

  Boenke, Lars T ^a,b   Ohl, Frank W ^b,c   Nikolaev, Andrey R ^a,d   Lachmann, Thomas ^a,e   Leeuwen, Cees van ^a  

^a RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF HIGHER NERVOUS ACTIVITY AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^e Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central processing bottleneck; Congruency; Event related potentials; Feature integration; Stroop and Garner interference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RESPONSE TIME; STROOP AND GARNER INTERFERENCE; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 61949486982     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aine C.J., and Harter M.R. Event-related potentials to Stroop stimuli: color and word processing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 425 (1984) 152-153
2. Aine C.J., and Harter M.R. Hemispheric differences in event-related potentials to Stroop stimuli: attention and color-word processing. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 425 (1984) 154-156
3. Algom D., Dekel A., and Pansky A. The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: the Stroop effect revisited. Mem. Cognit. 24 (1996) 557-572
4. Apelle S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychol. Bull. 17 (1972) 266-278
5. Awh E., and Jonides J. Overlapping mechanisms of attention and working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5 (2001) 119-126
6. Azizian A., Freitas A.L., Parvaz M.A., and Squires N.K. Beware misleading cues: perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology 43 (2006) 253-260
7. Busch N.A., Debener S., Kranczioch C., Engel A.K., and Herrmann C.S. Size matters: effect of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115 (2004) 1810-1820
8. Caclin A., McAdams S., Smith B.K., and Giard M.H. Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: an exploration with event-related potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20 (2008) 49-64
9. Cohen A., and Shoup R. Response selection processes for conjunctive targets. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26 (2000) 391-411
10. Collin, C.A., Large, M.-E., McMullen, P.A., 2003. Forest, trees and leaves: interference effects in 3-level Navon figures [Abstract]. J. Vis. 3, 762, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/762/, doi:10.1167/3.9.762.
11. Daffner K.R., Mesulam M.M., Scinto L.F., Calvo V., Faust R., and Holcomb P.J. An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 737-747
12. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanism of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (1995) 193-222
13. Dishon-Berkovits M., and Algom D. The Stroop effect: it is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be. Mem. Cognit. 28 (2000) 1437-1449
14. Donchin E. Surprise! ... Surprise?. Psychophysiology 18 (1981) 493-513
15. Doniger G.M., Foxe J.J., Murray M.M., Higgins B.A., Snodgrass J.G., Schroeder C.E., and Javitt D.C. Activation timecourse of ventral visual stream object-recognition areas: high density electrical mapping of perceptual closure process. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 124 (2000) 615-621
16. Duncan-Johnson C.C., and Kopell B.S. The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science 214 (1981) 938-940
17. Egner T., and Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1784-1790
18. Egner T., Delano M., and Hirsch J. Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage 35 (2007) 940-948
19. Eriksen B.A., and Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 16 (1974) 143-149
20. Folstein J.R., and Van Petten C. Multidimensional rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: event-related potential correlates. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30 (2004) 1026-1044
21. Folstein J.R., and Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45 (2008) 152-170
22. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C., and Rose S.A. Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli. Psychophysiology 45 (2008) 467-479
23. Flowers J.H. Priming effects in perceptual classification. Percept. Psychophys. 47 (1990) 135-148
24. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure (1974), Erlbaum Publishers, Potomac, MD
25. Garner W.R. Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes. Cognit. Psychol. 8 (1976) 98-123
26. Garner W.R. Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison. Percept. Psychophys. 44 (1988) 321-330
27. Garner W.R., and Felfoldy G.L. Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognit. Psychol. 1 (1970) 225-241
28. Hamers J.F., and Lambert W.E. Bilingual interdependencies in auditory perception. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 11 (1972) 303-310
29. Han S., Yund E.W., and Woods D.L. An ERP study of the global precedence effect: the role of spatial frequency. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 1850-1865
30. Heil M., Osman A., Wiegelmann J., Rolke B., and Hennighausen E. N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive processes?. J. Psychophysiol. 14 (2000) 218-225
31. Hochstein S., and Ahissar M. View from the top. Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36 (2002) 791-804
32. Hillyard S.A., Teder-Salejarvi W.A., and Munte T.F. Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8 (1998) 202-210
33. Ilan A.B., and Polich J. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110 (1999) 367-373
34. Irtel H. Stroop-Interferenz. Experimentalpsychologisches Praktikum (1993), Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 83-92 [Stroop interference. In: Practical work in Experimental Psychology] (in German)
35. Kaganovich N., Francis A.L., and Melara R.D. Electrophysiological evidence for early interaction between talker and linguistic information during speech perception. Brain Res. 1114 (2006) 161-172
36. Kerns J.G., Cohen J.D., MacDonald III A.W., Cho R.Y., Stenger V.A., and Carter C.S. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303 (2004) 1023-1026
37. Klimesch W., Hanslmayr S., Sauseng P., Gruber W.R., and Doppelmayr M. P1 and traveling alpha waves: evidence for evoked oscillations. J. Neurophysiol. 97 (2007) 1311-1318
38. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 557-577
39. Lachmann T., and van Leeuwen C. Negative congruence effects in letter and pseudo-letter recognition: the role of similarity and response conflict. Cogn. Process. 5 (2004) 239-248
40. Lachmann T., and van Leeuwen C. Different letter-processing strategies in diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 25 (2008) 730-744
41. Lew L., Chmiel R., Jerger J., Pomerantz J.R., and Jerger S. Electrophysiological indices of Stroop and garner interference reveal linguistic influences on auditory and visual processing. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 8 (1997) 104-118
42. Liotti M., Woldorff M.G., Perez R., and Mayberg H.S. An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 701-711
43. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 388 p
44. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109 (1991) 163-203
45. Mangun G.R. Neuronal mechanism of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 32 (1995) 4-18
46. Mangun G.R., and Hillyard S.A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17 (1991) 1057-1074
47. Marks L.E. Cross-modal interactions in speeded classification. In: Calvert G., Spence C., and Stein B.E. (Eds). The Handbook of Multisensory Processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 85-106
48. Mayr S., Niedeggen M., Buchner A., and Pietrowsky R. ERP correlates of auditory negative priming. Cognition 90 (2003) B11-B21
49. McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 203-208
50. McMahon M.J., and MacLeod D.I. The origin of the oblique effect examine with pattern adaptation and masking. J. Vis. 3 (2003) 230-239
51. Melara R.D., and Mounts J.R. Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Mem. Cognit. 21 (1993) 627-645
52. Melara R.D., and Algom D. Driven by information: a tectonic theory of stroop effects. Psychol. Rev. 110 (2003) 422-471
53. Mounts J.R.W., and Tomaselli R.G. Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 118 (2005) 261-275
54. Morein-Zamir S., Henik A., and Spitzer-Davidson I. The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 91 (2002) 119-125
55. Navon D. Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognit. Psychol. 9 (1977) 353-383
56. Nee D.E., Wager T.D., and Jonides J. Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7 (2007) 1-17
57. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., and Cohen J. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 157-160
58. Patching G.R., and Quinlan P.T. Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28 (2002) 755-775
59. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 (2007) 2128-2148
60. Pomerantz J.R. Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 112 (1983) 516-540
61. Pomerantz J.R., and Lockhead G.R. Perception of structure: an overview. In: Lockhead G.R., and Pomerantz J.R. (Eds). The Perception of Structure (1991), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1-20
62. Pomerantz J.R., Pristach E.A., and Carson C.E. Attention and object perception. In: Shepp B., and Ballesteros S. (Eds). Object Perception: Structure and Process (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 53-89
63. Proverbio A.M., Minniti A., and Zani A. Electrophysiological evidence of a perceptual precedence of global vs. local visual information. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 6 (1998) 321-334
64. Rebai M., Bernard C., and Lannou J. The Stroop's test evokes a negative brain potential, the N400. Int. J. Neurosci. 91 (1997) 85-94
65. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., and Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306 (2004) 443-447
66. Sekuler A.B., and Palmer S.E. Perception of partly occluded objects: a microgenetic analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 21 (1992) 95-111
67. Shalev L., and Algom D. Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 263 (2000) 997-1017
68. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 30 (1969) 276-315
69. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18 (1935) 643-662
70. Todd J.J., and Marois R. Capacity limit of visual-short term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 428 (2004) 751-754
71. Treisman A. Search, similarity and the integration of features between and within dimensions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (1991) 652-676
72. van Leeuwen C., and Bakker L. Stroop can occur without Garner interference: strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 57 (1995) 379-392
73. van Leeuwen C., and Lachmann T. Letters and shapes have opposite congruence characteristics. Percept. Psychophys. 66 (2004) 908-925
74. Van Orden G.C., Pennington B.F., and Stone G.O. What do double dissociations prove?. Cogn. Sci. 25 (2001) 111-172
75. Vogel E.K., and Luck S.J. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 190-203
76. West R., and Alain C. Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 8 (1999) 157-164
77. Wijers A.A., Mulder G., Okita T., and Mulder L.J.M. An ERP study on memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunctions of letter size and color. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 89-109