The role of achievement values in the regulation of achievement behaviors

Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 169-196

  Wigfield, Allan ^a   Hoa, Laurel W ^a   Klauda, Susan Lutz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849110691     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203831076     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational cli­mate. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.) Student perceptions in the class­room (pp. 327-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372.
3. Au, K. H. (1997). Ownership, literacy achievement, and students of diverse cultural backgrounds. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Read­ing engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 168-182). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise ofcontrol. New York: Freeman.
5. Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 56-75.
6. Battle, E. (1965). Motivational determinants of academic task persistence. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 2, 209-218.
7. Battle, E. (1966). Motivational determinants of academic competence. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 4, 534-642.
8. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Brophy, J. E. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation for education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34, 75-86.
10. Brophy, J. E. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
12. Byrnes, J. P. (1998). The nature and development ofdecision-making: A self­regulation perspective. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum.
13. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structural of behavioral self­regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 41-84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Davis, M. H., & Tonks, S. (2004). Diverse texts and technology for reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivat­ing reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 143-172). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analy­sis. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 98, 382-393.
16. Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. Sondereg- ger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 97-132). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17. Eccles, J. S. (1993). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choice. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1992: Developmentalperspectives on motivation (pp. 145-208). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
18. Eccles Parsons, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behav­iors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
19. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involve­ment: Applying the Eccles’ expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied SportPsychology, 3, 7-35.
20. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The struc­ture of adolescents’ academic achievement related-beliefs and self­perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
21. Fredricks, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519-533.
22. Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Classroom contexts for engaged reading: An over­view. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Moti­vating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Guthrie, J. T., & Taboada, A. (2004). Fostering the cognitive strategies of reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Per­encevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 87-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G. R., McCann, A., Anderson, E., & Alao, S. (1998). Does Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction increase strategy-use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educa­tional Psychology, 90, 261-278.
25. Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N., & Littles, E. (in press). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. ContemporaryEducational Psychology.
26. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in read­ing. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension, moti­vation, and strategy use through Concept Oriented Reading Instruc­tion. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 96, 403-423.
28. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. H., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232-247.
29. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. ScientificStudies ofReading, 3, 231-257.
30. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.). (2004a). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Mah­wah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004b). Scaffolding for motivation and engagement in reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept- Oriented Readinglnstruction (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Von Secker, C. (2000) Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331-341.
33. Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic ori­entation in the classroom: Motivational and informational compo­nents. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312.
34. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Motivating the academically unmo­tivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.
35. Jacobs, J., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Ontogeny of children’s self-beliefs: Gender and domain differences across grades 1 through 12. ChildDevelopment, 73, 509-527.
36. Lutz, S. L., Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2006). Scaffolding for engage­ment in elementary school reading instruction. Journal ofEducational Research, 100, 3-20.
37. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxi­ety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.
38. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learn­ing. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook ofself-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
40. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-reg­ulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wig- field & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, T., & Rollet, W. (2000). Motivation and action in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R., Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 503-529). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination theory research (pp. 3­33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
44. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279.
45. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learn­ing: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pin­trich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631-649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-effi­cacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development ofachievement motivation (pp. 15-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. Berliner & R. Cal- fee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85-113). New York: Macmillan.
48. Stipek, D. J. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309-351). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49. Swan, E. A. (2003). Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: Engaging class­rooms, lifelonglearners. New York: Guilford.
50. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psy­chology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
51. Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
52. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78.
53. Wigfield, A. (1997, April). Predicting children’s grades from their ability beliefs and subjective task values: Developmental and domain dif­ferences. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.
54. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task val­ues: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
55. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
56. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs and values from childhood through adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 92-120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-spe­cific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565.
58. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook ofchildpsychology (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 933-1002). New York: Wiley.
59. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., Freed- man-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3- year study. Journal ofEducational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
60. Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Chil­dren’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal ofEducational Research, 97, 299-309.
61. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy-value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning. Vol. 4: Big theories revisited (pp. 165-198). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
62. Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motiva­tional regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and class­room performance. Learningand Individual Differences, 11, 281-301.
63. Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underem­phasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 189-205.
64. Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
65. Wolters, C. A., & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students’ motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strate­gies. International Journal ofEducational Research, 33, 801-820.
66. Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learningand Individual Differences, 8, 211-239.
67. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press