Classroom contexts for engaged reading: An overview

Motivating Reading Comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-20

  Guthrie, John T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Maryland Literacy Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250159260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610126     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Baker, L., Dreher, M.J., & Guthrie, J.T. (2000). Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation, New York: Guilford.
2. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1992). The initiation and regulation of intrinsically motivated learning and achievement. In A.K.Boggiano & T.S.Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social developmental perspective (pp. 3-36). Toronto, Canada: Cambridge University Press.
3. Guthrie, J.T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. Elementary School Journal 99, 343-366.
4. Guthrie, J.T., & Cox, K.E. (2001). Classroom conditions for motivation and engagement in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 283-302.
5. Guthrie, J.T., Schafer, W.D., &. Huang, C (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 96(3), 145-162
6. Guthrie, J.T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G.R., Alao, S., Anderson, E., & McCann, A. (1998). Does Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 261-278.
7. Guthrie, J.T., Weber, S., & Kimmerly, N. (1993). Searching documents: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 186-221.
8. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L.Kamil, P.B.Mosenthal, P.D.Pearson, & R.Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook, 3, (pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & Von Secker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331-341.
10. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century, Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
11. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read-an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
12. Paris, S.G., Wasik, B.A., & Turner, J.C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M.L.Kamil, P.Mosenthal, & P.D.Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
13. Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32.
14. Stipek, D. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D.C.Berliner & R.C.Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85-113). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
15. Yolen, J. (1987). Owl moon. New York: Putnam & Grosset.