Real options and escalation of commitment: A behavioral analysis of capital investment decisions

Accounting Review

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 133-155

  Denison, Christine A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capital budgeting; Escalation of commitment; Real options; Sunk cost effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349188275     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.1.133     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adner, R., and D. A. Levinthal. 2004. What is not a real option: Considering boundaries for the application of real options to business strategy. Academy of Management Review 29 (January): 74-85.
2. Amram, M., and N. Kulatilaka. 1999. Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
3. Bargh, J. A., and R. D. Thein. 1985. Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (November): 1129-1146.
4. -, and M. J. Ferguson. 2000. Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin 126 (November): 925-945.
5. Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psycho-logical research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173-1182.
6. Beeler, J. D. 1988. Effects of counter-explanation on escalation of commitment: An experimental assessment of individual and collective decision. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 1: 85-99.
7. Bowman, E. H., and D. Hurry. 1993. Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review 18 (October): 760-782.
8. Bragger, J. D., D. Bragger, D. A. Hantula, and J. Kirnan. 1998. Hysteresis and uncertainty: The effect of uncertainty on delays to exit decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74 (June): 229-253.
9. Busby, J. S., and C. G. C. Pitts. 1997. Real options in practice: An exploratory study of how finance officers deal with flexibility in capital appraisal. Management Accounting Research 8 (June): 169-186.
10. Chartrand, T. L., and J. A. Bargh. 1996. Automatic activation of social information processing goals: Nonconscious priming reproduces effects of explicit conscious instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (September): 464-478.
11. Cheng, M. M., A. K. Schulz, P. F. Luckett, and P. Booth. 2003. The effects of hurdle rates on the level of escalation of commitment in capital budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15: 63-85.
12. Chow, C. W., P. Harrison, T. Lindquist, and A. Wu. 1997. Escalating commitment to unprofitable projects: Replication and cross-cultural extension. Management Accounting Research 8 (September): 347-362.
13. Conlon, E. J., and G. Wolf. 1980. The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26 (2): 172-192.
14. Copeland, T. E., and V. Antikarov. 2001. Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide. New York, NY: Texere. Coy, P. 1999. Exploiting uncertainty: The "real-options" revolution in decision-making. BusinessWeek Online (June 7).
15. Dixit, A., and R. Pindyck. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Drummond, H. 1996. Escalation in Decision-Making: The Tragedy of Taurus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Etcheverry, P. E., and B. Le. 2005. Thinking about commitment: Accessibility of commitment and willingness to sacrifice. Personal Relationships 12 (March): 103-123.
18. Fazio, R. H., D. M. Sanbonmatsu, M. L. Powell, and F. R. Kardes. 1986. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (February): 229-238.
19. -, and C. J. Williams. 1986. Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (September): 505-514.
20. -, and T. Towles-Schwen. 1999. The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, edited by S. Chaiken, and Y. Trope, 97-116. New York, NY: Guilford.
21. Fink, R. 2001. Reality check for real options: Applying Black-Scholes analysis to capital spending projects has one big flaw. CFO Magazine (September 1).
22. Ghosh, D. 1997. De-escalation strategies: Some experimental evidence. Behavioral Research in Accounting 9: 88-112.
23. Goltz, S. M. 1993. Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences 24 (September/October): 977-994.
24. Graham, J. R., and C. R. Harvey. 2001. The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics 60 (May): 187-243.
25. Harrell, A., and P. Harrison. 1994. An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers' project evaluation decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (October): 569-578.
26. Higgins, E., G. King, and G. Mavin. 1982. Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 35-47.
27. -. 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E. T. Higgins, and A. W. Kruglanski, 133-168. New York, NY: Guilford.
28. Howell, S., A. Stark, D. Newton, D. Paxson, M. Cavus, J. Pereira, and K. Patel. 2001. Real Options: Evaluating Corporate Investment Opportunities in a Dynamic World. London, U.K.: Prentice Hall.
29. Howell, S. D., and A. J. Jagle. 1997. Laboratory evidence on how managers intuitively value real growth options. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 24 (September): 915-935.
30. Jeffrey, c. 1992. relation of judgment, personal involvement, and experience in the audit of bank loans. the accounting review 67 (october): 802-819.
31. Kadous, K., and L. M. Sedor. 2004. The efficacy of third-party consultation in preventing managerial escalation of commitment: The role of mental representations. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (Spring): 55-82.
32. Kanodia, C, R. Bushman, and J. Dickhaut. 1989. Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Spring): 59-77.
33. Keil, M., R. Mixon, T. Saarinen, and V. Tuuainen. 1994. Understanding ruanway information technology projects: Results from an international research program based on escalation theory. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (Winter): 65-85.
34. -, and J. Flatto. 1999. Information systems project escalation: A reinterpretation based on options theory. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9 (2): 115-139.
35. Kogut, B., and N. Kulatilaka. 1994. Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Review 36 (Winter): 52-71.
36. Lander, D. M., and G. E. Pinches. 1998. Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options. Quarterly Review of Economics 38 (Special Issue): 537-567.
37. McGrath, R. G. 1999. Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review 24 (January): 13-20.
38. Miller, D., C. Droge, and S. Vickery. 1997. Celebrating the "essential": The impact of performance on the functional favoritism of CEOs in two contexts. Journal of Management 23 (2): 147-168.
39. Miller, K. D., and Z. Shapira. 2004. An empirical test of heuristics and biases affecting real option valuation. Strategic Management Journal 25 (March): 269-284.
40. Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5 (November): 147-176.
41. Newton, D. P., D. A. Paxson, and M. Widdicks. 2004. Real R&D options. International Journal of Management Reviews 5-6 (June): 113-130.
42. Posavac, S. S., D. M. Sanbonmatsu, and R. H. Fazio. 1997. Considering the best choice: Effects of the salience and accessibility of alternatives on attitude-decision consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (February): 253-261.
43. Ratneshwar, S., L. Warlop, D. G. Mick, and G. Seeger. 1997. Benefit salience and consumers' selective attention to product features. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14: 245-259.
44. Ross, S. 1995. Uses, abuses, and alternatives to the net-present-value rule. Financial Management 24 (Autumn): 96-102.
45. Rutledge, R. W., and K. E. Karim. 1999. The influence of self interest and ethical considerations on managers' evaluation judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (February): 173 184.
46. Schmidt, J. B., and R. J. Calantone. 2002. Escalation of commitment during new product development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (Spring): 103-118.
47. Schoorman, F. D., and P. J. Holahan. 1996. Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: Effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. The Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (December): 786-794.
48. Schulz, A. K., and M. M. Cheng. 2002. Persistence in capital budgeting reinvestment decisions Personal responsibility antecedent and information asymmetry moderator: A note. Accounting and Finance 42 (March): 73-86.
49. Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (June): 27-44.
50. -, and H. Hoang. 1995. Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (September): 474-494.
51. -. 1997. The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In Organizational Decision Making, edited by Z., Shapira, 191-215. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
52. Sudman, S., N. M. Bradburn, and N. Schwarz. 1996. Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes To Survey Methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
53. Teach, E. 2003. Will real options take root? Why companies have been slow to adopt the valuation technique. CFO Magazine (July 1).
54. Tiwana, A., M. Keil, and R. G. Fichman. 2006. Information systems project continuation in escalation situations: A real options model. Decision Sciences 37 (3): 357-391.
55. -, J. Wang, M. Keil, and P. Ahluwalia. 2007. The bounded rationality bias in managerial valuation of real options: Theory and evidence from IT projects. Decision Sciences 38 (1): 157-181.
56. Trigeorgis, L. 1997. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57. Yavas, A., and C. F. Sirmans. 2005. Real options: Experimental evidence. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 31 (1): 27-52.
58. Zardhooki, A. 2004. Do real options lead to escalation of commitment? Academy of Management Review 29 (January): 111-119.