The Efficacy of Third-Party Consultation in Preventing Managerial Escalation of Commitment: The Role of Mental Representations

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-82

  Kadous, Kathryn ^a   Sedor, Lisa M ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Escalation of commitment; Justification; Mental representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142760976     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1506/r0mh-w9h9-cqjd-1356     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anderson, C. A., M. R. Lepper, and L. Ross. 1980. Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1037-49.
2. Anderson, R. C., and J. W. Pichert. 1978. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17(1): 1-12.
3. Arkes, H. R., and C. Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35 (1): 124-40.
4. Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173-82.
5. Bazerman, M. H. 1994. Judgment in managerial decision making, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Bazerman, M. H., R. I. Beekun, and R D. Schoorman. 1982. Performance evaluation in a dynamic context: A laboratory study of the impact of a prior commitment to the ratee. Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (6): 873-76.
7. Bazerman, M. H., T. Giuliano, and A. Appelman. 1984. Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33 (2): 141-52.
8. Bobocel, D. R., and J. P. Meyer. 1994. Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (3): 360-63.
9. Brockner, J. 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review 17 (1): 39-61.
10. Cheng, M. M., A. K-D. Schulz, P. F. Luckett, and P. Booth. 2003. The effects of hurdle rates on the level of escalation of commitment in capital budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15: 63-85.
11. Chow, C. W., P. Harrison, T. Lindquist, and A. Wu. 1997. Escalating commitment to unprofitable projects: Replication and cross-cultural extension. Management Accounting Research 8 (3): 347-61.
12. Conlon, D. E., and H. Garland. 1993. The role of project completion information in resource allocation decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 402-13.
13. Conlon, E. J., and G. Wolf. 1980. The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26 (2): 172-92.
14. Gangestad, S. W., and M. Snyder. 2000. Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 126 (4): 530-55.
15. Garland, H., and D. E. Conlon. 1998. Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (22): 2025-48.
16. Garrison, R. H., and E. W. Noreen. 2000. Managerial accounting. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
17. Ghosh, D. 1997. De-escalation strategies: Some experimental evidence. Behavioral Research in Accounting 9: 88-112.
18. Gibbins, M. 1984. Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (1): 103-25.
19. Harrell, A., and P. Harrison. 1994. An incentive to shirk, privately held information, and managers' project evaluation decisions. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 19 (7): 569-77.
20. Harrison, P. D., and A. Harrell. 1993. Impact of "adverse selection" on managers' project evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36 (3): 635-43.
21. Hastie, R., and B. Park. 1986. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review 93 (3): 258-68.
22. Horngren, C. T., S. M. Datar, and G. Foster. 2003. Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23. Jeffrey, C. 1992. The relation of judgment, personal involvement, and experience in the audit of bank loans. The Accounting Review 67 (4): 802-19.
24. Johnson, V. E., and S. E. Kaplan. 1991. Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10 (Supplement): 96-107.
25. Kanodia, C., R. Bushman, and J. Dickhaut. 1989. Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: An explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (1): 59-77.
26. Kennedy, J. 1993. Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2): 231-45.
27. Koehler, D. J. 1991. Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin 110 (3): 499-519.
28. Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480-98.
29. Kunda, Z. 1999. Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Libby, R., R. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson. 2002. Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 27 (8): 775-810.
31. Markman, A. B., and D. Gentner. 2001. Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 223-47.
32. Northcraft, G. B., and M. A. Neale. 1986. Opportunity costs and the framing of resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (3): 348-56.
33. Peecher, M. E., and I. Solomon. 2001. Theory and experimentation in studies of audit judgments and decisions: Avoiding common research traps. International Journal of Auditing 5 (3): 193-203.
34. Pichert, J. W., and R. C. Anderson. 1977. Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology 69 (4): 309-15.
35. Rettinger, D. A., and R. Hastie. 2001. Content effects on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85 (2): 336-59.
36. Reyes, R. M., W. C. Thompson, and G. H. Bower. 1980. Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1): 2-12.
37. Ross, J., and B. M. Staw. 1993. Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant. Academy of Management Journal 36 (4): 701-32.
38. Samuelson, W., and R. Zeckhauser. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7-59.
39. Schlenker, B. R., and M. F. Weigold. 1992. Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 133-68.
40. Schoorman, F. D. 1988. The escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1): 58-62.
41. Schoorman, F. D., and P. J. Holahan. 1996. Psychological antecedents of escalation behavior: Effects of choice, responsibility, and decision consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (6): 786-94.
42. Schulz, A. K.-D., and M. M. Cheng. 2002. Persistence in capital budgeting reinvestment decisions -Personal responsibility antecedent and information asymmetry moderator: A note. Accounting and Finance 42 (1): 73-86.
43. Sherman, S. J., K. S. Zehner, J. Johnson, and E. R. Hirt. 1983. Social explanation: The role of timing, set, and recall on subjective likelihood estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (6): 1127-43.
44. Sniezek, J. A., and T. Buckley. 1995. Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 (2): 159-74.
45. Sniezek, J. A., and L. M. Van Swol. 2001. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 84 (2): 288-307.
46. Snyder, M. 1974. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30 (4): 526-37.
47. Snyder, M., and S. Gangestad. 1986. On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1): 125-39.
48. Srull, T. K., and R. S. Wyer Jr. 1989. Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review 96(1): 58-83.
49. Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 (1): 27-44.
50. Staw, B. M. 1981. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review 6 (4): 577-87.
51. Staw, B. M. 1997. The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In Organizational Decision Making, ed. Z. Shapira, 191-215. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Staw, D. M., S. G. Barsade, and K. W. Koput. 1997. Escalating at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives' recognition and write-off of problem loans. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1): 130-42.
53. Tetlock, P. E. 1985. Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior 7: 297-332.
54. Tetlock, P. E., and R. Boettger. 1994. Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7 (1): 1-23.
55. Turner, C. W. 2001. Accountability demands and the nature of the auditor's evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action). Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 683-706.
56. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207-32.
57. Whyte, G. 1986. Escalating commitment to a course of action: A reinterpretation. Academy of Management Review 11 (2): 311-21.
58. Wilks, T. J. 2002. Predecisional distortion of evidence as a consequence of real-time audit review. The Accounting Review 11 (1): 51-71.
59. Wyer, R. S., and S. E. Gordon. 1982. The recall of information about persons and groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18 (2): 128-64.
60. Wyer, R. S., and T. K. Srull. 1980. The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration. In Person Memory: Cognitive Basis for Social Perception, eds. R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, and D. E. Carlston, 227-300. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.