Experienced science teachers' learning in the context of educational innovation

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 184-199

  Henze, Ineke ^a   Van Driel, Jan H ^b   Verloop, Nico ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Educational innovation; Experienced science teachers; Informal learning; Storyline method; Workplace learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 60749086838     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487108329275     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Association for Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Aikenhead, G.S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science and technology. New York: John Wiley.
3. Aikenhead, G.S., & Ryan, A.G. (1992). The development of a new instrument. Views on science-technology-society (VOSTS). Science Education, 76, 477-491.
4. Bennett, J., & Holman, J. (2002). Context-based approaches to the teaching of chemistry: What are they and what are their effects? In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 165-184). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
5. Beijaard, D., Van Driel, J.H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Evaluation of story-line methodology in research on teachers' practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 47-62.
6. Boulton-Lewis, G.M., Wills, L., & Mutch, S. (1996). Teachers as adult learners: Their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching. Higher Education, 32, 89-106.
7. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
8. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
10. Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners. Narrative of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19, 2-14.
12. Conway, P.F. (2001). Anticipatory reflection while learning to teach: From a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 89-106.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports students learning. Educational Leadership, 55 (5). 6-11.
14. De Vos, W., & Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in the Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 711-719.
15. Fuller, F.F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
16. Gergen, K.J., & Gergen, M.M. (1986). Narrative form and the construction of psychological science. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.),. Narrative psychology: Storied nature of human conduct (pp. 22-44). New York: Praeger.
17. Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Simon & Shuster.
18. Hunt, A. (1990). SATIS 16-19. Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.
19. Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. New York: Croom Helm.
20. Kapteijn, M. (1997). De experimentele omscholingscursus Algemene Natuurwetenschappen [The experimental in-service training course on public understanding of science]. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der S-wetenschappen, 14, 157-176.
21. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lohman, M.C., & Woolf, N.H. (2001). Self-initiated learning activities of experienced public school teachers: Methods, sources, and relevant organizational influences. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7, 59-74.
25. McLaughlin, M.W. (1997). Rebuilding teacher professionalism in the United States. In A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.), Beyond educational reform (pp. 77-93). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
26. NEAB (Northern Examinations and Assessment Board) (1998). Science for Public Understanding (syllabus). Harrogate, UK: NEA B.
27. Oosterheert, J., & Vermunt, J.D. (2003). Knowledge construction in learning to teach: The role dynamic sources. Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 157-163.
28. Pigge, F.L., & Marso, R.N. (1997). A seven-year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 225-235.
29. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views on knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning ? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
30. Schwab, J.J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Schwab, J.J. (1963). Biology teachers' handbook. New York: John Wiley.
32. SLO Voorlichtingsbrochure ANW. (1996). Voorlichtingsbrochure havo/ vwo Algemene natuurwetenschappen [Information brochure on public understanding of science]. Enschede, the Netherlands: Author.
33. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 54 (3). 12-16.
34. Solomon, G., & Perkins, D.N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P. Pearson & A. Iran-Nejad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 1-24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
35. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (Eds.). (1994). STS education. International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Van der Sanden, J.M.M., & Teurlings, C.C.J. (2003). Developing competence during practice periods: The learner's perspective. In T. Tuomi-Grohn & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing (pp. 119-136). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
37. Van Eekelen, I.M., Boshuizen, H.P.A., & Vermunt, J.D. (2005). Self-regulation in higher education teacher learning. Higher Education, 50, 447-471.
38. Verloop, N. (1999). De leraar. Review studie in opdracht van de programmaraad voor het Onderwijsonderzoek [The teacher. Review study commissioned by the program council for educational research]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: NWO/PROO.
39. Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
40. Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
41. Westbroek, H. (2005). Characteristics of meaningful chemistry education: The case of water quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
42. Yager, R. (Ed.). (1996). Science/technology/science as reform in science education. New York: Sunny Press.