Adverse events with silicone hydrogel continuous wear

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 137-146

  Dumbleton, Kathy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CIPROFLOXACIN; LUBRICATING AGENT; MYDRIATIC AGENT; QUINOLINE DERIVED ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; SILICONE; STEROID;

ACCURACY; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT LENS INDUCED ACUTE RED EYE; CONTACT LENS INDUCED PERIPHERAL ULCER; CORNEA EROSION; CORNEA ULCER; CYST; EDEMA; EXTENDED WEAR CONTACT LENS; EYE DISEASE; EYE INFECTION; EYE INFLAMMATION; HUMAN; HYDROGEL; HYPEREMIA; HYPOXIA; INCIDENCE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SUPERINFECTION; SUPERIOR EPITHELIAL ARCUTAE LESION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 0036739269     PISSN: 13670484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1367-0484(02)00009-7     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Oxford Canadian dictionary, 1998.
2. Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, et al. Hypoxic effects on the anterior eye of high-Dk soft contact lens wearers are negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(2):95-9.
3. Dumbleton K, Fonn D, Jones L, et al. Severity and management of contact lens related complications with continuous wear of high-Dk silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77(12s):216.
4. Keay L, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, et al. Microcysts: clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Optometry 2001;72(7):452-60.
5. Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, et al. Microcyst response to high-Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77(11):582-5.
6. Dumbleton K, Jones L, Chalmers A, et al. Clinical characterization of spherical post-lens debris associated with lotrafilcon high-Dk silicone lenses. CLAO J 2000;26;4:186-92.
7. Willcox MDP, Stapleton F. Ocular bacteriology. Rev Med Microbiol 1996;7:123-31.
8. Jalbert I, Willcox MDP, Sweeney DE. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from a contact lens at the time of a contact lens-induced peripheral ulcer: case report. Cornea 2000;19(1):116-20.
9. Grant T, Chong MS, Vajdic C, et al. Contact lens induced peripheral ulcers during hydrogel contact lens wear. CLAO J 1998;24(3): 145-51.
10. Holden BA, La Hood D, Grant T, et al. Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. CLAO J 1996;22(1):47-52.
11. Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MDP, Sharma S, et al. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34(10):2426-31.
12. Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, et al. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet 1999;354(9174):181-5.
13. Ren DH, Petroll WM, Jester JV, Ho-Fan J, Cavanagh HD. The relationship between contact lens oxygen permeability and binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human corneal epithelial cells after overnight and extended wear. CLAO J 1999;25:80-100.
14. Sack RA, Nunes I, Beaton A, Morris C. Host-defence mechanism of the ocular surfaces. Biosci Rep 2001;21(4):463-80.
15. Willcox MDP, Sankaridurg PR, Lan J, et al. Inflammation and infection and the effects of the closed eye. In: Sweeney D, editor. Silicone hydrogels. The rebirth of continuous wear contact lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000. p. 45-75.
16. Weissman BA, Mondino BJ. Microbial keratitis. In: Efron N, editor. The cornea its examination in contact lens practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001. p. 50-85.
17. Stapleton E, Willcox MDP, Fleming CM, et al. Changes in the ocular biota with time in extended and daily wear disposable contact lens use. Infect Immun 1995;63:4501-5.
18. Larkin DFP, Leeming JP. Quantitative alterations of the commensal eye bacteria in contact lens wear. Eye 1991;5:70-4.
19. Hart DE, Reindel W, Proskin HM, Mowrey-McKee MF. Microbial contamination of hydrophilic contact lenses: quantitation and identification of micro-organisms associated with contact lenses while on the eye. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:185-91.
20. Willcox MDP, Power KN, Stapleton F. Potential sources of bacteria that are isolated from contact lenses during wear. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:1030-8.
21. Sack RA, Tan KO, Tan A. Diurnal tear cycle: evidence for a nocturnal inflammatory constitutive tear fluid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:626-40.
22. 2 transmissible contact lenses on bacterial binding and corneal epithelium: a 1-year clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2002;109(1):27-39.
23. Holden BA, Reddy MK, Sankaridurg PR, et al. Contact lens-induced peripheral ulcers with extended wear of disposable hydrogel lenses: histopathologic observations on the nature and type of corneal infiltrate. Cornea 1999;18(5):538-43.
24. Sweeney DF, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA, et al. Atypical presentation of contact lens induced peripheral ulcers-multiple focal infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77(12s):164.
25. Sweeney DF, Stern J, Naduvilath T, Holden BA. Inflammatory adverse event rates over 3 years with silicone hydrogel lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43(4):40.
26. Keay L, Willcox MDP, Sweeney DF, et al. Bacterial populations on 30-night extended wear silicone hydrogel lenses. CLAO J 2001;27:30-4.
27. Lim L, Loughnan LS, Sullivan LJ, et al. Microbial keratitis associated with extended wear of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:355-7.
28. Willcox MDP, Holden BA. Contact lens related corneal infections. Biosci Rep 2001;21(4):445-61.
29. Allan B, Dart J. Strategies for the management of microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:777-86.
30. Bennett H, Hay J, Kirkness C, et al. Antimicrobial management of presumed microbial keratitis: guidelines for treatment of central and peripheral ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:137-45.
31. Willcox MDP, Thakur A, Holden BA. Some potential pathogenic traits of Gram-negative bacteria isolated during ocular inflammation and infections. Clin Exp Optom 1998;81(2):56-62.
32. Willcox MDP, Hume EB. Differences in the pathogenesis of bacteria isolated from contact-lens-induced infiltrative conditions. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1999;27(3/4):231-3.
33. Sankaridurg PR, Vuppala N, Sreedharan A, et al. Gram-negative bacteria and contact lens induced acute red eye. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996;44(1):29-32.
34. Sankaridurg PR, Sharma S, Willcox MDP, et al. Bacterial colonization of disposable soft contact lenses is greater during corneal infiltrative events than during asymptomatic extended lens wear. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38(12):4420-4.
35. Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MDP, Sharma S, et al. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34(10):2426-31.
36. Young G, Mirejovsky D. A hypothesis for the aetiology of soft contact lens-induced superior arcuate keratopathy. Int Contact Lens Clin 1993;20(9/10):177-9.
37. Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, et al. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(1):9-12.
38. O'Hare N, Naduvilath T, Jalbert I, et al. Superior epithelial arcuate lesions (SEALs): a case control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41(4):s386.
39. O'Hare N, Naduvilath T, Sweeney D, et al. A clinical comparison of limbal and paralimbal superior epithelial arcuate lesions (SEALs) in high-Dk EW. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42(4):s595.
40. Stern J, Skotnitsky C, O'Hare N, et al. Comparison of the incidence of contact lens papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) between 6 and 30 nights high-Dk soft extended wear schedules. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42(4):s597.
41. Carnt NA, Sweeney DF, Stern J, et al. Factors associated with unusual cases of acute infiltrative keratitis in silicone hydrogel extended wear. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43(4):125.
42. Cutter G, Chalmers R, Roseman M. The clinical presentation, prevalance and risk factors of focal corneal infiltrates in soft contact lens wearers. CLAO J 1996;22(1):30-7.
43. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses: a case-control study (Microbial Keratitis Study Group). N Engl J Med 1989;321(12):773-8.
44. Brennan N, Mullen B. Increased susceptibility of younger people to adverse reactions with silicone hydrogel contact lens continuous wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(12s):229.
45. duToit R, Stern J, Tahhan N, et al. Non-compliance with contact lens care may increase the occurrence of adverse ocular responses. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78(12s):228.
46. McNally J, McKenney CD. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17(1):38-41.
47. Holden BA, Sankaridurg PR, Jalbert I. Adverse events and infections: which ones and how many? In: Sweeney D, editor. Silicone hydrogels. The rebirth of continuous wear contact lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000. p. 150-213.
48. Nilsson SE. Seven-day extended wear and 30-day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a randomized 1-year study of 504 patients. CLAO J 2001;27(3): 125-36.
49. Holden BA. Extended wear: past, present and future. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002;17(1):32-7.
50. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, et al. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989;321(12):779-83.
51. Nilsson SE, Montan PG. The annualized incidence of contact lens induced keratitis in Sweden and its relation to lens type and wear schedule: results of a 3-month prospective study. CLAO J 1994;20(4):225-30.