Mitotic crisis: The unmasking of a novel role for RPA

Cell Cycle

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 357-361

  Anantha, Rachel William ^a   Borowiec, James A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Centrosome; Mitotic DNA damage; Phosphorylation; Plk1; RPA; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; POLO LIKE KINASE 1;

CENTROSOME; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME; HUMAN; MITOSIS; REVIEW; STRESS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 59449109775     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.3.7496     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Reed JC. Dysregulation of apoptosis in cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:2941-53.
2. Anantha RW, Sokolova E, Borowiec JA. RPA phosphorylation facilitates mitotic exit in response to mitotic DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:12903-8.
3. Binz SK, Sheehan AM, Wold MS. Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:1015-24.
4. Anantha RW, Vassin VM, Borowiec JA. Sequential and synergistic modification of human RPA stimulates chromosomal DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:35910-23.
5. Olson E, Nievera CJ, Klimovich V, Fanning E, Wu X. RPA2 Is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:39517-33.
6. Vassin VM, Wold MS, Borowiec JA. Replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:1930-43.
7. Binz SK, Lao Y, Lowry DF, Wold MS. The phosphorylation domain of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions. Evidence for an intersubunit interaction. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:35584-91.
8. Oakley GG, Patrick SM, Yao J, Carty MP, Turchi JJ, Dixon K. RPA phosphorylation in mitosis alters DNA binding and protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry 2003; 42:3255-64.
9. Smits VA, Klompmaker R, Arnaud L, Rijksen G, Nigg EA, Medema RH. Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:672-6.
10. Huang X, Tran T, Zhang L, Hatcher R, Zhang P. DNA damage-induced mitotic catastrophe is mediated by the Chk1-dependent mitotic exit DNA damage checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:1065-70.
11. 2 arrest after DNA damage. Science 1998; 282:1497-501.
12. 1 arrest in resulting tetraploid cells. Cancer Res 2001; 61:7660-8.
13. Petronczki M, Lenart P, Peters JM. Polo on the rise-from mitotic entry to cytokinesis with Plk1. Dev Cell 2008; 14:646-59.
14. Cheng L, Hunke L, Hardy CF. Cell cycle regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae polo-like kinase cdc5p. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:7360-70.
15. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999; 286:1166-71.
16. van Vugt MA, Smits VA, Klompmaker R, Medema RH. Inhibition of Polo-like kinase-1 by DNA damage occurs in an ATM- or ATR-dependent fashion. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:41656-60.
17. Tang J, Erikson RL, Liu X. Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is required for mitotic progression through negative regulation of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:11964-9.
18. Tsvetkov LM, Tsekova RT, Xu X, Stern DF. The Plk1 Polo box domain mediates a cell cycle and DNA damage regulated interaction with Chk2. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:609-17.
19. Yuan JH, Feng Y, Fisher RH, Maloid S, Longo DL, Ferris DK. Polo-like kinase 1 inactivation following mitotic DNA damaging treatments is independent of ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase. Mol Cancer Res 2004; 2:417-26.
20. Brito DA, Rieder CL. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1194-200.
21. Leng M, Chan DW, Luo H, Zhu C, Qin J, Wang Y. MPS1-dependent mitotic BLM phosphorylation is important for chromosome stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:11485-90.
22. Fisk HA, Mattison CP, Winey M. A field guide to the Mps1 family of protein kinases. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:439-42.
23. Elia AE, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Proteomic screen finds pSer/pThr-binding domain localizing Plk1 to mitotic substrates. Science 2003; 299:1228-31.
24. Nakajima H, Toyoshima-Morimoto F, Taniguchi E, Nishida E. Identification of a consensus motif for Plk (Polo-like kinase) phosphorylation reveals Myt1 as a Plk1 substrate. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:25277-80.
25. Lowery DM, Clauser KR, Hjerrild M, Lim D, Alexander J, Kishi K, et al. Proteomic screen defines the Polo-box domain interactome and identifies Rock2 as a Plk1 substrate. EMBO J 2007; 26:2262-73.
26. Sillje HH, Takahashi K, Tanaka K, Van Houwe G, Nigg EA. Mammalian homologues of the plant Tousled gene code for cell cycle-regulated kinases with maximal activities linked to ongoing DNA replication. EMBO J 1999; 18:5691-702.
27. Groth A, Lukas J, Nigg EA, Sillje HH, Wernstedt C, Bartek J, et al. Human Tousled like kinases are targeted by an ATM- and Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO J 2003; 22:1676-87.
28. Krause DR, Jonnalagadda JC, Gatei MH, Sillje HH, Zhou BB, Nigg EA, et al. Suppression of Tousled-like kinase activity after DNA damage or replication block requires ATM, NBS1 and Chk1. Oncogene 2003; 22:5927-37.
29. Sillje HH, Nigg EA. Identification of human Asf1 chromatin assembly factors as substrates of Tousled-like kinases. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1068-73.
30. Carrera P, Moshkin YM, Gronke S, Sillje HH, Nigg EA, Jackle H, et al. Tousled-like kinase functions with the chromatin assembly pathway regulating nuclear divisions. Genes Dev 2003; 17:2578-90.
31. Sunavala-Dossabhoy G, Balakrishnan SK, Sen S, Nuthalapaty S, De Benedetti A. The radioresistance kinase TLK1B protects the cells by promoting repair of double strand breaks. BMC Mol Biol 2005; 6:19.
32. Sen SP, De Benedetti A. TLK1B promotes repair of UV-damaged DNA through chromatin remodeling by Asf1. BMC Mol Biol 2006; 7:37.
33. Sunavala-Dossabhoy G, De Benedetti A. Tousled homolog, TLK1, binds and phosphorylates Rad9-TLK1 acts as a molecular chaperone in DNA repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2008.
34. Han Z, Riefler GM, Saam JR, Mango SE, Schumacher JM. The C. elegans Tousled-like kinase contributes to chromosome segregation as a substrate and regulator of the Aurora B kinase. Curr Biol 2005; 15:894-904.
35. Li Z, Gourguechon S, Wang CC. Tousled-like kinase in a microbial eukaryote regulates spindle assembly and S-phase progression by interacting with Aurora kinase and chromatin assembly factors. J Cell Sci 2007; 120:3883-94.
36. Hashimoto M, Matsui T, Iwabuchi K, Date T. PKU-beta/TLK1 regulates myosin II activities, and is required for accurate equaled chromosome segregation. Mutat Res 2008.
37. Trenz K, Errico A, Costanzo V. Plx1 is required for chromosomal DNA replication under stressful conditions. EMBO J 2008; 27:876-85.
38. Doxsey S, Zimmerman W, Mikule K. Centrosome control of the cell cycle. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:303-11.
39. Jackman M, Lindon C, Nigg EA, Pines J. Active cyclin B1-Cdk1 first appears on centrosomes in prophase. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:143-8.
40. Huang J, Raff JW. The disappearance of cyclin B at the end of mitosis is regulated spatially in Drosophila cells. EMBO J 1999; 18:2184-95.
41. Wakefield JG, Huang JY, Raff JW. Centrosomes have a role in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in early Drosophila embryos. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1367-70.
42. Loffler H, Lukas J, Bartek J, Kramer A. Structure meets function - centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:2633-40.
43. Takada S, Kelkar A, Theurkauf WE. Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 couples centrosome function and spindle assembly to genomic integrity. Cell 2003; 113:87-99.
44. Tsvetkov L, Xu X, Li J, Stern DF. Polo-like kinase 1 and Chk2 interact and co-localize to centrosomes and the midbody. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:8468-75.
45. Loffler H, Bochtler T, Fritz B, Tews B, Ho AD, Lukas J, et al. DNA damage-induced accumulation of centrosomal Chk1 contributes to its checkpoint function. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:2541-8.
46. Griffin CS, Simpson PJ, Wilson CR, Thacker J. Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:757-61.
47. Daboussi F, Thacker J, Lopez BS. Genetic interactions between RAD51 and its paralogues for centrosome fragmentation and ploidy control, independently of the sensitivity to genotoxic stresses. Oncogene 2005; 24:3691-6.
48. Lindh AR, Rafii S, Schultz N, Cox A, Helleday T. Mitotic defects in XRCC3 variants T241M and D213N and their relation to cancer susceptibility. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15:1217-24.
49. Lesca C, Germanier M, Raynaud-Messina B, Pichereaux C, Etievant C, Emond S, et al. DNA damage induce gamma-tubulin-RAD51 nuclear complexes in mammalian cells. Oncogene 2005; 24:5165-72.
50. Tutt A, Gabriel A, Bertwistle D, Connor F, Paterson H, Peacock J, et al. Absence of Brca2 causes genome instability by chromosome breakage and loss associated with centrosome amplification. Curr Biol 1999; 9:1107-10.
51. Han X, Saito H, Miki Y, Nakanishi A. A CRM1-mediated nuclear export signal governs cytoplasmic localization of BRCA2 and is essential for centrosomal localization of BRCA2. Oncogene 2008; 27:2969-77.
52. Andersen JS, Wilkinson CJ, Mayor T, Mortensen P, Nigg EA, Mann M. Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profiling. Nature 2003; 426:570-4.